Posted on 12/29/2008 4:09:11 PM PST by wagglebee
LifeNews.com Note: Paul M. Weyrich is the late chairman of the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation. He was an early pro-life advocate starting in the 1970s and this is likely his last column on the subject of abortion prior to his recent death.
The President-elect appears to have stepped back from some of his campaign promises. That merely is speculation. We shall see. The President-elect did make a dogmatic statement regarding the so-called "Freedom of Choice" Act (FOCA).
He said he will propose FOCA, which would eliminate all State and Federal restrictions upon abortion. It would purport to force Christian hospitals to perform abortions or close. It would demand that physicians perform abortions or give up their practice.
Whatever happened to freedom of conscience?
A hallmark of professionalism in the United States has been that we never force anyone to violate his or her conscience in the performance of a duty. That is the first line of defense of the pro-life movement.
Even more than the Hyde Amendment, which has prohibited funding by the Federal Government of many abortions, the idea of freedom of conscience unites all parties in the pro-life movement, which has made progress since the passage of the Hyde Amendment.
There hardly has been a Congress which made no progress on the right-to-life issue. And when progress was stymied at the Federal level, many restrictions were enacted at the State level. Most were tested in the Federal courts and were held to be constitutional.
It is inconceivable to me that a majority in Congress can't agree upon freedom of conscience.
Counting the votes, I doubt that there are enough pro-lifers in Congress to maintain the restrictions previously passed by Congress. However, even honest liberals would favor allowing a physician to practice medicine consistent with his or her life-saving principles of conscience.
Most Republicans, as well as many Democrats, ran as pro-lifers in the 2008 election. This fundamental issue may become the first test of their commitment to life. If we force hospitals and physicians to perform abortions against their beliefs, in other words in violation of their conscience, then we will be on a downward spiral from which there may be no return.
This will be a test, America. God help all of us.
But Obama and Pelosi will NEVER let them vote this way.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Plus you can be “honest” or you can be a “liberal” but you can’t be both. Just isn’t possible.
******************
God help us indeed. We need a miracle.
religious — specifically Judeo-Christian — institutions have put the “civil” in civilization. Force them out of the equation, and we slide back into the dark ages.
Now, tell me what other cultures refuse to allow Judeo-Christian institutions. I’m thinking, Sharia-dominated ones, and communist ones.
So that’s where FOCA and similar propositions will take us.
How can Obamanation have a conscience when he says that he would not punish his daughters with a pregnancy?
Ugodly, in my estimation.
Oops
Ungodly, in my estimation.
Sure, there are those who pay lipservice to the idea that we can get along with their crowd and maintain a country we can both live in, but that's just BS.
FOCA may well take this country across a line many don't wish to go, but I daresay the pro-abortion crowd will not survive that journey.
I agree with you “honest” and “liberal” are not compatible
but I’ve said many times (perhaps not on FR) that finding
a good substitute for “liberal” is a big part of the battle.
“This will be a test, America.”
In electing the anti-Christ Obama, the United States has already failed the test.
Badly.
We are left with nothing but pleading God for mercy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.