Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. attorney's office seeks 3 more months to indict Gov. Rod Blagojevich
Chicago Tribune ^ | January 1, 2009 | John Chase

Posted on 01/02/2009 6:39:53 AM PST by COUNTrecount

Federal authorities investigating Gov. Rod Blagojevich have intercepted thousands of phone calls, interviewed a number of new cooperating witnesses and targeted several potential defendants in the case, according to a court filing released Wednesday.

The motion was made in federal court by prosecutors who are seeking an extra three months to formally indict Blagojevich and his former chief of staff, John Harris.

The move was expected because the deadline for handing up an indictment had been set for Jan. 7. The extension would give U.S. Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald's office until April 7.

Fitzgerald's office cited the complexity of the case in seeking the extra time.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blago; blagojevich; bleepgate; fitgerald; fitzgerald; obama; obamatransitionfile
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 01/02/2009 6:39:53 AM PST by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Doesn't Blago have a right to a “speedy and public trial by jury?”
2 posted on 01/02/2009 6:41:53 AM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Fitz is looking for his pony and now needs more time to dig through the pile.


3 posted on 01/02/2009 6:42:31 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: pnh102

I think its called “moving the goal posts.”


5 posted on 01/02/2009 6:42:51 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pnh102

“Doesn’t Blago have a right to a “speedy and public trial by jury?” “He would, IF he were actually charged with something.


6 posted on 01/02/2009 6:43:39 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Actually it sounds like a reasonable plan.

Even if it is crystal clear that Blagojevich solicited prospective purchasers of the Senate seat, why would he think that the Jacksons or the SEIU would be interested buyers?

Blagojevich isn’t stupid, he didn’t make the offers just “hoping”. He had to have reasons to believe that the buyers were corrupt.

The charges against Blago definitely shouldn’t be the end of this investigation.


7 posted on 01/02/2009 6:47:00 AM PST by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Great graphic. This is good for Blago and bad for Oba Mao. It’ll keep a cloud over hime for three more months, despite the efforts of the enemedia to spin it and put the Sheeple back to sleep. Great graphic, by the way!


8 posted on 01/02/2009 6:48:12 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or, are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Pingaroo.


9 posted on 01/02/2009 6:48:18 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Geez, 3 more months of Blago posing and pouting in front of the cameras, with his faux, "who.....moi?" act.

He's the most shameless attention whore I've ever seen, including Clinton, and that's saying something.

10 posted on 01/02/2009 6:51:01 AM PST by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future"- Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: COUNTrecount

Love it.


12 posted on 01/02/2009 6:55:08 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Good one.


13 posted on 01/02/2009 6:55:33 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

There are some great posts on this thread.


14 posted on 01/02/2009 6:56:19 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

15 posted on 01/02/2009 6:59:46 AM PST by TonyStark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
This is crap. It's all for Obama. If Blago is indicted by Jan 7, some nasty stuff will come out about Rahm and the O=man. So it has to wait until some time after the swearing in. The ONE will be well entrenched as prez by April. No one will care what went on “so long ago pre-prez”
16 posted on 01/02/2009 7:03:08 AM PST by weston (As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
"Speedy trial, baby, the people of Illinois deserve no less."

Please pass the popcorn

17 posted on 01/02/2009 7:13:34 AM PST by NonValueAdded (once you get to really know people, there are always better reasons than [race] for despising them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Not to mention that it will force Obama to keep Fitzgerald (the Johnny Sutton of the North) in his job while he fires the rest of the federal prosecuters.


18 posted on 01/02/2009 7:15:44 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Fitz is covering for the new administration plain and simple. If they were worried about getting something that was going to stick, why didn’t they wait until money changed hands? They cut this investigation off because instead of stinking up Chicago/Illinois politics, it was going to stink up the new administration and Fitz didn’t want it to come to that. Personally, I think he doesn’t have much of a case and now he is trying to salvage something, which should look sickening to everyone involved. You pull the trigger prematurely, but now you need 3 months? For what?

Yet, if this were a Republican, we all know what would have happened...


19 posted on 01/02/2009 7:20:59 AM PST by lt.america (Looking for a bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

What do you think? The longer Fitzgerald takes, the worse it may be for Obama? Happy thoughts anyway.


20 posted on 01/02/2009 7:28:14 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson