[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

Inbred Science. Your one-stop shop for light reading about demonic biologists and crazed evolutionary mad scientists.

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

"Nomad! Sterilize! Sterilize!" ping.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

[P.O.E.]

Another way to improve the stock: Grafting:

[Niuhuru]

Of course these idiots don’t think that once they get too old they won’t be turned into Soylent Green.

[Question_Assumptions]

It's clear from the very opening sentences that the author is attributing cultural differences to race, which is clearly wrong. See Thomas Sowell's book Race and Culture for the fairly clear and consistent effects produced by certain cultural characteristics around the world, regardless of which races are in play. Success comes from valuing and practicing forward planning, thrift, and education.

[1000 silverlings]

It never ends, and then one day “unfit” can mean whatever the bullies want it to mean, for instance “they” don’t think properly, like “we” do.

[razorback-bert]

We would sure be better off if Stephen Hawkins had been offed.

[Bhoy]

Did you get this on the Club of Rome website or was it in the Green Agenda? [hahhahahah]

[Zionist Conspirator]

Thank you for the ping!

[metmom]

Science is a pretty poor thing to base morals on.

[dan1123]

Mistaken regard for what are believed to be divine laws and a sentimental belief in the sanctity of human life tend to prevent both the elimination of defective infants and the sterilization of such adults as are themselves of no value to the community. The laws of nature require the obliteration of the unfit and human life is valuable only when it is of use to the community or race.

Just wow. To look into his logic, there is are "divine laws" commonly believed but "mistaken", and "laws of nature" which he believes wholeheartedly. What makes the "laws of nature" any better than the "divine laws" apparently amount to convenience of the species (or himself?). It can be easily argued that there are no "laws of nature" since introducing a species into a new environment can wreck the ecosystem and cause the death of many species including the one introduced in the first place--not to mention the many mass-extinction events throughout natural history. If these things can be argued to have anything with respect to law it would be "lawlessness", and so arguing from the basis of "natural law", especially imputed to humanity which can possibly uniquely restrain itself for noble causes, is to argue not for better law, but for no law at all.

[baa39]

“...men of physical and intellectual vigor.”

How many of those do you know? Right from the first sentence, we’re in deep trouble. Let’s see, we need to eliminate men in blue states, those who use the NYT as their Bible, 98% of university professors, vegans....well, heck, I can see where this is headed. Men on FR are the only ones worthy to live.