Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why freedom won't die in the 21st century
worldnetdaily.com/ ^ | January 03, 2009 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 01/03/2009 10:16:16 AM PST by shielagolden

Why freedom won't die in the 21st century When Bill Clinton assumed the presidency in 1993, few people had ever heard the term "sustainable development." When Barack Obama assumes the presidency on Jan. 20, sustainable development will guide the formulation of public policy in city councils, county commissions, state legislatures,

the U.S. Congress and the U.N. General Assembly. (Sustainable development) is the reorganization of society around a body of principles and recommendations set forth in a document called ("Agenda 21,)" endorsed by 179 nations in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. Sustainable development has permeated government at every level because its sponsors have executed a magnificent marketing campaign and provided extensive funding incentives for the agencies and governments that implement Agenda 21 recommendations. Sustainable development is government management of all development to achieve environmental protection and economic and social equity.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda21; development; freedom; henrylamb; sustainable

1 posted on 01/03/2009 10:16:17 AM PST by shielagolden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Agenda 21 and its’ communist promoters won’t go quietly, or easily. They have permeated all levels of the gov’t, and now have free reign.


2 posted on 01/03/2009 10:21:46 AM PST by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Agenda 21 and its’ communist promoters won’t go quietly, or easily. They have permeated all levels of the gov’t, and now have free reign.


3 posted on 01/03/2009 10:21:52 AM PST by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

Agenda 21 and its’ communist promoters won’t go quietly, or easily. They have permeated all levels of the gov’t, and now have free reign.


4 posted on 01/03/2009 10:21:52 AM PST by datura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

You can say that again.


5 posted on 01/03/2009 11:17:52 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
When Bill Clinton assumed the presidency in 1993, few people had ever heard the term "sustainable development." When Barack Obama assumes the presidency on Jan. 20, sustainable development will guide the formulation of public policy in city councils, county commissions, state legislatures, the U.S. Congress and the U.N. General Assembly.

6 posted on 01/03/2009 11:21:41 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile finally updated Saturday, December 6, 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

ping


7 posted on 01/03/2009 11:36:55 AM PST by VigilantAmerican (We will not waver, we will not tire; we will not falter, we will not fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
Hmmm! Sounds good....but is it realistic? The mid-to-late 90's was the time action should have been implemented in order to have a realistic chance to work.

Just think, if, somehow, we could have gained control of the house and senate, the appropriate actions to prevent the current freedom-holocaust could have been taken.

Opps! My bad!

8 posted on 01/03/2009 12:45:45 PM PST by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden

When the Berlin Wall fell, the socialists we taken aback. Shell-shocked, they needed to regroup and find a whole new way to advance their socialist engineering plans.

They found their answer in evinromentalism at the global level.


9 posted on 01/03/2009 1:54:26 PM PST by WOSG (Obama - a born in the USA socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
Sustainable development is government management of all development to achieve environmental protection and economic and social equity.
I thought sustainable development was development that people could afford.
10 posted on 01/03/2009 6:35:42 PM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden; WOSG; Clemenza; rmlew; Yehuda; nutmeg; firebrand

Ideas don’t die by themselves. Socialism was not proven a failure like fascism and Nazism. Communism needed to be defeated by burying it in radioactive rubble just like Japan and almost Germany. Instead it partially collapsed in Russia and transformed itself everywhere else. The left sees the failure of the USSR not in socialism itself but in it’s leadership. Thus they will incessantly promote the square wheel again. We see socialism as a failure because it fails to provide prosperity and technical progress. he left doesn’t give a fart for those things, all they want is the power, it’s all that matters to them.They are obsessed with equality, even if that means we all starve. The sooner we realize that the better. You can’t fight these zombies by pointing the misery in socialist countries, they could care less. Along with the Muslims we will have to kill them all. You can’t reason with a rabid dog, you have to put him to sleep. The only way to defeat a faulty idea is to show it’s total and utter uselessness and prove it’s a dead end.


11 posted on 01/03/2009 6:38:41 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

The American Dream

An obituary

The American Revolution was an extraordinary event. The idea that freedom was an inherent right, that tyranny could be successfully opposed, that government could serve the people, not the few, was truly revolutionary in 1776—as it is today.

The American Revolution, however, has run its course; and unless resuscitated and given new life, the American dream and the dreams of America’s founding fathers will soon be only a memory. Dreams rarely come to pass and those that do rarely last. The American dream is no exception.

What happened in 1776 has been subverted by the passage of time and the inconstancy of later generations. Those who rule America today have subverted the principles enumerated in the US Constitution; principles the Founding Father hoped would guide those who followed them through the crises yet to come.

The principles were not many, e.g. fiscal prudence, sound money, separation of church and state and a limited military and limited government. But even those few and clearly stated principles succumbed over the years to the imposition of policies that had given rise to the need to revolt in 1776.

Now, in 2008, tyranny and government excesses are again upon America, but this time it is by America’s own hand. The policies of King George III were no more egregious than the policies of President George Bush II.— taxation without real representation, e.g. TARP (80 % Americans opposed), the imposition of policies contrary to the will of the people, e.g. US presence in Iraq and Afghanistan (70 % opposed), and the loss of individual freedoms under the Patriot Act (60 % opposed).

The difference between 1776 and 2008 is that America is now tyrannized not by the King of England but by its own government. Today, the US government does not represent the will of the people. It represents instead the special interests that control the US government through the buying of votes—America is not for sale only because it has already been sold.

The difference between 1776 and 2008 is not only 232 years. It is the difference between the dream of the Founding Fathers and the shadow of that dream in whose increasing darkness Americans now exist.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IS THE REASON FOR AMERICA’S

FALL FROM POWER AND THE SOURCE OF ITS INCREASING PROBLEMS

Thomas Jefferson warned 200 hundred years ago that if private bankers were allowed to issue America’s money, indebtedness, foreclosure and suffering would follow. Yet, in 1913, private bankers gained control over America’s money by the passage of the Federal Reserve Act.

We are now suffering for ignoring Jefferson’s warnings. Jefferson was right in predicting our problems but his words were overridden by those who had other plans for America, plans that would increase their profits at the expense of the nation.

It is no accident America is now an empty shell of the great economic power it once was. Bled dry by debt imposed by those whose sole intent was to profit, the US is now bankrupt at a time it desperately needs the resources it no longer has.

The US Treasury is now empty except for IOUs and only if others continue to buy America’s debts can America continue to go forward. Once we were creditors, now we are debtors. America cannot escape the consequences of what has been done but we can limit our problems if we undo their cause.

The Federal Reserve Act was enacted by Congress and signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson who later bitterly regretted what he had done to America.

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.

Woodrow Wilson, US President

The power of the Federal Reserve System—a system controlled by a small group of dominant men—derives solely from is power to issue debt-based money in the form of US dollars and to charge interest on their issuance. We are paying our jailors for our enslavement and are fools for so doing. Who would have thought—except Jefferson.


12 posted on 01/04/2009 5:57:41 PM PST by shielagolden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shielagolden
"Thomas Jefferson warned 200 hundred years ago that if private bankers were allowed to issue America’s money, indebtedness, foreclosure and suffering would follow. Yet, in 1913, private bankers gained control over America’s money by the passage of the Federal Reserve Act."

.

How many people KNOW THIS ????? Most think THE FED is a gubmint organization...TOTALLY unaware it is PRIVATE !!!!

13 posted on 01/04/2009 6:01:29 PM PST by litehaus (A memory tooooo long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

we how have taxation without representation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1590858026591557284


14 posted on 01/04/2009 6:07:36 PM PST by shielagolden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

check out my video out


15 posted on 01/04/2009 6:08:53 PM PST by shielagolden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson