Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Filibuster FOCA!
Men for Palin Blog ^ | January 4, 2008 | W. T. Howes

Posted on 01/04/2009 7:34:45 AM PST by Charlie Fairbanks

The Republicans in Washington can stop the hideous liberal agenda. The Legislative abomination that is FOCA needs to be stopped. With 41 Republicans in the Senate and with the chaos in the Democratic Caucus, a Republican should be able to mount a filibuster, and there should be enough Republicans to oppose a cloture motion. A filibuster would support the efforts of millions to pass significant abortion reform legislation nationwide.

(Excerpt) Read more at menforpalin.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; abortion; agenda; bhoabortion; foca; gop; moralabsolutes; palin; prolife
There is chaos in the Democratic caucus in the United States Senate. There are controversies surrounding vacancies in the Dem-held seats in New York and Illinois. There is a controversy over the seat from Minnesota currently held by Senator Norm Coleman. On paper, there are 58 Democrats in the Senate. However, there are currently only 56 live Democrat bodies prepared to walk the halls of the United States Senate.

There are 41 Republicans in the United State Senate. Only 40 votes are required to sustain a filibuster. A successful filibuster can stop bad legislation dead in its tracks. There are a lot of awful proposals out there - Corporate bailouts, State government bailouts, economic “stimulus”, for example. There is an additional high-priority proposal that tops the list of Obama Administration priorities. That proposal is the Freedom of Choice Act, known commonly by its acronym “FOCA”. FOCA is a worthy target for a filibuster.

FOCA would obliterate nearly four decades of reform efforts in state legislatures, the Congress and in state referenda. Political choices have been made to pass legislation reforming abortion practice and procedure nationwide. At least 27 states and the federal government have passed Partial Birth Abortion Bans. At least 35 states have legislative requirements that parents of minors be informed and give consent before a teen can undergo an abortion. FOCA would wipe out all of those laws, and more.

FOCA’s name is an Orwellian deception because each of those laws represents a choice made by tens of millions of Americans. Each one of those laws was passed because of courageous legislative sponsors and co-sponsors, because of legislative leaders who posted the bills and because of legislators who voted for those bills. Each one of those laws passed because of pro-life advocacy groups that mounted effective public information and public relation campaigns nationwide. Each one of those laws passed because millions of voters support pro-life advocacy groups and tens of millions of Americans support pro-life candidates for public office.

The choices made by legislators, pro-life lobbyists and politicians across the land are supported by an American public that is pro-life. According to the most recent polling data, over seventy percent of Americans support significant limitations on abortion. Indeed, seventy per cent of Americans support a ban on abortion except in cases of rape or incest. Only three percent of abortions are for pregnancies that result from rape or incest. Therefore, seventy per cent of Americans support banning ninety-seven per cent of abortions.

The Obama Administration wants to pass and sign FOCA as soon as possible. FOCA would wipe out the choices made by tens of millions of Americans. We need a courageous Republican to stand up for the tens of millions of Americans who made the choice to ban partial-birth abortion and to require parental notification in cases where teens are subject to abortion.

1 posted on 01/04/2009 7:34:45 AM PST by Charlie Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Charlie Fairbanks

We need to pray really hard that some of the Dem Senators still have consciences.


2 posted on 01/04/2009 7:36:53 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlie Fairbanks

I am not sure any of the Dems have a conscience but they do have auto plants in states (mostly southern) where so-called Blue Dogs are exposed. Hammer them and I believe that some will take a walk or decide that maybe a secret ballot is the more American way of voting than at the dictates of a union thug.


3 posted on 01/04/2009 7:44:11 AM PST by MarkT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

consciences, backbones, intestinal fortatude, and.. and.. well you know.


4 posted on 01/04/2009 7:45:40 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Charlie Fairbanks

While there doesn’t appear to be much evil that isn’t on the table, and most any of it can find a Democrat sponsor, at this moment, is the FOCA ball in the air?


5 posted on 01/04/2009 8:02:27 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The Freedom of Choice Act (making Roe vs. Wade Federal law) can be stopped. Does the GOP have the gonads to do whatever it takes to stop it?


6 posted on 01/04/2009 8:05:50 AM PST by Clintonfatigued (If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
The Freedom of Choice Act (making Roe vs. Wade Federal law) can be stopped. Does the GOP have the gonads to do whatever it takes to stop it?

Sorry to say, I don't see it being filibustered. I can think of one pro-life Dem (Casey). How many pro-abort pubbies are there? Snowe, Collins, Specter...

7 posted on 01/04/2009 8:07:27 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
On paper, there are three pro-life Democrat senators: Casey (PA), Pryor (AR), and Nelson (NE). Byrd (WV) has a mixed record on abortion but sometimes opposes federalizing social issues best left to the states. I think Nelson is truly independent and pro-life and would filibuster. Pryor is iffy, and subject to arm twisting by the leadership. Casey has the family heritage but he's been disappointing and has often capitulated on pro-life issues when pressured by the party bosses.

The bill might be stopped in the House. There are quite a few pro-life Dems there, and also a lot of Dems from marginal districts with mixed records on abortion.

8 posted on 01/04/2009 8:18:05 AM PST by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Charlie Fairbanks

Bookmark for later pingout.


9 posted on 01/04/2009 9:25:44 AM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charlie Fairbanks

We need to get the largest crowd that ever attended the PRO_LIFE MARCH ON WASHINGTON.Fortunately it is January 22nd.We are already expecting many thousands to attend.It is also one of the most ecumenical events you will ever attend.


10 posted on 01/04/2009 9:31:48 AM PST by ardara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkT

FOCA is about abortion, not card-check. But you’re right, it’s hard to tell, with the Democrats being so thorough in their “Deception-in-Labeling” drive.


11 posted on 01/04/2009 9:31:50 AM PST by cookcounty ("A ship in harbor is safe, but that's not why the ship is built." ---Governor Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson