Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/07/2009 10:05:08 AM PST by TaraP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: TaraP

75 posted on 01/07/2009 11:35:26 AM PST by Bobalu (McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP

There is a saying in the Navy:

‘Not in my Navy!’

Never so true as with this.


97 posted on 01/07/2009 12:54:38 PM PST by edge10 (Obama lied, babies died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP

“Approximately 58 percent of the respondents indicated that they were in favor of continuing the ban.”

If its really that LOW its all over.


102 posted on 01/07/2009 1:45:11 PM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP

“She believes those who might consider leaving have legitimate concerns if the law is repealed. “The new policy would be forced co-habitation with homosexuals 24-7 in all military communities,” Donnelly adds. “Corollary programs to make the program work would include professional diversity training to enforce acceptance and zero tolerance of anyone who disagrees.”

- and soon to be an all gay armed forces with the same military readiness as the Netherlands army.


105 posted on 01/07/2009 2:01:12 PM PST by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP
I've posted this before - if homosexuals ever get the “right” to serve openly in the military, they will be untouchable by anyone with a complaint or accusation against them. Political correctness will have come full circle, leaving corpses in its wake.
109 posted on 01/07/2009 4:45:09 PM PST by fwdude ("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP

Pingout tonight.


112 posted on 01/07/2009 6:00:04 PM PST by little jeremiah (Leave illusion, come to the truth. Leave the darkness, come to the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP

Newsmax.com

Obama Expected to End Don’t Ask Don’t Tell
Thursday, January 8, 2009 9:04 AM

WASHINGTON – Sixteen years after Bill Clinton tried to end restrictions on gays in the military, the US armed forces under Barack Obama may be forced to give homosexuals the same welcome as non-gays.

Under president Clinton, the policy that once saw homosexuals discharged from US military service evolved to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” allowing gays to remain in the military so long as they did not reveal their sexual orientation.

Obama has pledged to overhaul current law.

“The key test for military service should be patriotism, a sense of duty, and a willingness to serve. Discrimination should be prohibited,” reads an entry on the president-elect’s transition website.

Shortly after taking the oath of office in 1993, Clinton originally moved for an outright ban on discrimination based on sexual orientation in the military. excerpt


127 posted on 01/09/2009 5:28:37 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TaraP

Unbelievable!
Once upon a time, whites feared allowing blacks in the service, and once they did, would not give them guns out of fear of retaliation for the way whites treated blacks. Many of our service people are black, and fight with more bravery than any white man. Not only did they have to fight and kill the enemy, they had to fight bigotry within the ranks. And with their head held high. These men were maimed, and killed by the enemy the same as any white man. Once upon a time, those of German and Japanese ancestry were eyed suspiciously when it came to fighting in WWII. The fear was they would turn their guns on Americans because of the war. This did not happen, aany served, and died defending a country that saw them as less than human or not as American. Once upon a time women were seen as weak, and should not be in the service except in support capacity (nurses, secretaries, etc) It was feared they would run from battle, and could not physically handle the job. These women fought, been maimed and died for this country. Not many in the ranks believed any of these groups would have their back in combat. They were proven WRONG! Of course some did leave the military when blacks, Germans, Japanese, and women were allowed to fully serve. Didn’t exactly kill the military, did it? In short, it’s all a non-issue these days, isn’t it?
Gays have and always will serve and die in the armed forces with pride. Whether you know about it or not. It should also be noted the 1st American soldier injured (lost a leg, many other serious injuries) and one of the 1st to die in the current war was... GAY! and Prez Bush acknowledge the injured one at the 2004 Republican convention. So, you all see, it REALLY does not matter what race, sex, national origin or sexual orientation is. The hard truth, not published in the article, whether you like it or not, is the overwhelming majority who took the survey, 71 %, basically said repealing DADT would not affect their decision to serve. These are ACTIVE Duty personnel! Maybe the 10% and 14% are cowards and are looking for an out? I wonder why there is no outrage expressed here about that!
We’re all American, and those who want to serve proudly and as who they are, should! Unless there is some sophomoric reason. Leave the fear, name calling, and ignorance on the playground where it belongs!
The only thing you have to fear, is fear it’s self.


128 posted on 01/11/2009 11:45:56 PM PST by mikescorpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson