Oh then it must be true. It's on snopes and factcheck./s
11/12/2008 Fox news reports that Cameron was not the victim of a hoax but that MSNBC and NY Times were. Fox stands by the story to this day as far as I can find.
Sure... because they are too cowardly to admit they were also victims of the hoax. "Standing by the story" is worthless if Cameron won't disclose his source. If the source is valid, Cameron has to disclose it. Otherwise it's just amateurish grandstanding. Again you seem to take every word by Cameron and Fox for gospel.
The liberal media flew with it and made Cameron look bad.
There is one MSM and Cameron is part of it. He is not the "victim" of the liberal media you paint him to be. What made him look bad was his own reckless and amateurish reporting.
Anything retracting the story by Fox? Not that I can find. Cameron and Fox stand by it.
The Obama camp also stand by their lies. Yet they won't disclose dozens of documents on Obama. I guess their word is good enough for you. Only because they stand by a lie, doesn't make it true. Palin and McCain's staff called it absurd and offered counter evidence (Palin's knowledge about Darfur i.e.). Yet Cameron standing by his claim, while not disclosing his "source" is good enough for you.
Figures. You believe it, because you want it to be true. Meh.
Just answer me one question: Why hasn't Cameron disclosed his source?
“Oh then it must be true. It’s on snopes and factcheck./s”
Google the story and pick any other source you may agree with other than your own opinion.
I don’t know of any reporter who would disclose a confidential source. I accept that. That in itself does not prove the story wrong. We have to go by our opinion of the integrity of the reporter which is why I’ve asked you repeatedly to provide any proof of the claim that Cameron is a liberal as you originally stated but then changed that he’s a moderate. Other than it being your opinion slamming him, I have listened to his reports for years and I think he’s been pretty fair. He’s no CNN, MSNBC or other network useful idiot.
If I thought you’d read one thing I wrote in strong oppostion to Obama’s scam candidacy, I’d take the time to provide you my previous FR posts on that.
If a troll is anyone shilling for their candidate, does that make you a troll?