Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oath Flub merits a do-over, scholars say
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 1/20/2009 | Carolyn Lochhead

Posted on 01/20/2009 10:45:44 PM PST by America2012

Several constitutional lawyers said President Barack Obama should, just to be safe, retake the oath of office that Chief Justice John Roberts flubbed.

The 35-word oath is explicitly prescribed in the Constitution, Article II, Section One, which says the president "shall" take the oath "before he enteron the execution of his office." It was discussed during the Constitutional Convention.

Roberts misplaced the word "faithfully," at which point Obama paused quizzically, and then Roberts corrected himself, but then Obama repeated the words as Roberts initially said them.

The oath reads: "I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

A do-over "would take him 30 seconds, he can do it in private, it's not a big deal, and he ought to do it just to be safe," said Boston University constitutional scholar and Supreme Court watcher Jack Beermann. "It's an open question whether he's president until he takes the proper oath."

The courts would probably never hear a challenge, and some might argue that Obama automatically took office at noon because that's when President Bush left the office. But because the procedure is so explicitly prescribed in the Constitution, Beermann said if he were Obama's lawyer, he would recommend retaking it, just as two previous presidents, Calvin Coolidge and Chester Arthur, did under similar circumstances.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhoinauguration; flub; flubbedoath; oamaoathtranscript; oath; oathofoffice; oathtranscript; obama; obamaoath; obamaoathtranscript; obamaswearingin; roberts; robertsflubbedoath; swearingin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: EternalVigilance

Actually, isn’t it the 20th amendment to the Constitution that makes the swearing-in a formality? The office changes hands at noon regardles of what the incoming president says or does. So calling the swearing-in a “formality” is actually a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

I don’t have a problem with that, but do wish that the Dem voters would show a little more class and respect for tradition.


61 posted on 01/21/2009 9:26:01 AM PST by Shigarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: visualops

she is the kind of person who is a know it all, and she was caught not knowing damn thing.


62 posted on 01/21/2009 9:29:20 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

yeah, it was.


63 posted on 01/21/2009 9:29:47 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Shigarian

No amendment can make an oath sworn before God into a mere formality.

God is watching and listening.


64 posted on 01/21/2009 9:36:10 AM PST by EternalVigilance (God is watching and listening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

My experience is that inductees hold up their hands and move their lips. Obama did that. In any case, the principle behind fixed terms that they expire, that the office is vacated at that point and that the duly elected person holds the office from that point in time unless he chooses to resign.


65 posted on 01/21/2009 10:37:37 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

The President does not necessarily give an oath. He can just affirm his intention.


66 posted on 01/21/2009 10:42:52 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: America2012
Does this mean Barry is still not the President and Biden is Acting-President?

He's president. But the legality of his actions could be challenged since the Constitution says he must take the oath before exercising the duties of President. What we need not is a lawsuit. Paging Mr. Berg, Mr. Philip Berg. Please call your office.

67 posted on 01/21/2009 10:45:35 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

I have no idea what that means. An oath is required, and an oath is binding before God and man.


68 posted on 01/21/2009 10:47:43 AM PST by EternalVigilance (God is watching and listening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I don’t think Hoover swore an oath, because he was a Quaker. Art VI forbids any religious test, and it would be pointless to ask an atheist to take an oath.
I think the constitution says,” I solemnly swear (or affirm)....”


69 posted on 01/21/2009 10:52:21 AM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Either way, he is bound to follow the Constitution.

We’re dealing with something here that is at the very heart of our form of republican self-government. The failure to keep the oath of office is at the core of why the country is going down. And practically our entire legal and political elite are the guilty parties in this regard.


70 posted on 01/21/2009 11:14:44 AM PST by EternalVigilance (God is watching and listening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
In any case, the principle behind fixed terms that they expire, that the office is vacated at that point and that the duly elected person holds the office from that point in time unless he chooses to resign.

I guess you onlly respect *parts* of the Constitution then. The Constitution commands that the oath be taken before entering into the office.

But the inductees also sign the oath, do they not? I know officers do, since I did, and I checked to see if they still do. Do we expect less of the President than of a new shavetail/butter bar?

71 posted on 01/21/2009 11:53:41 AM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson