Have you seen Obamah's certified birth certificate? Do you think that thing we've seen is actually a birth certificate?
Posted on 01/22/2009 7:01:08 AM PST by dascallie
How is this possible? Orly Taitz has a scheduled conference hearing for Jan23, by Justice Roberts...it has disappeared from the docket.
posted by Shestheone
IP: 72.224.141.133
Jan 22nd, 2009 - 7:38 AM Re: America's finest ! Dr Orly Taitz- Just sent lots of subpeona 's out _ I hope she sees my future
Ah, but her cases are no longer on the docket - bo has struck. All elgibility cases have disappeared. Please call and write to our Supreme Court and demand that they put the elgibility cases back on the docket. Visit scotusblog.feedback@gmail.com too and leave feedback.
Philippians 4:6
Be anxious for nothing, but in everything by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known to God;
God is in control.
Does Alan Keyes have any means of judicial relief at this point?
It was filed under Lightfoot vs Bowen I think
see below:
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21, 2009
Obama has been in power only one day and they are already playing games with the Supreme Court
Obama has been in power only one day. Suddenly today my case has disappeared from the docket. The case was not dismissed. It is supposed to be heard on the 23rd of January. Each and every American Citizen needs to call the Supreme court and demand decency from these Justices. They have violated all principles of judicial integrity and ethics by inviting Obama and Biden to the closed door meeting only a few days before the hearing. They have inaugurated him in from of millions of people, when 3 days after the inauguration they are supposed to hear my case, where I state that Obama is not eligible for presidency and never was eligible. They were supposed to recuse themselves from the inauguration. What is going on? Is Chicago mafia influencing the Supreme Court? If we don’t have integrity with our elected officials and the whole system is corrupt, then it is time to revolt and change the system.
POSTED BY ORLY TAITZ, DDS ESQ. AT 3:09 PM
http://drorly.blogspot.com/2009/01/obama-has-been-in-power-only-one-day.html
It is factual in that the cases aren’t listed anymore. It is still speculation as to what exactly happened.
Copy:
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/01/lightfoot-v-bowen-set-for-123.html
Update, 1/21, 6:52pm: Just received this via email form a trusted source.
All the cases on Obama’s eligibility, even the pending ones, have been removed from the SCOTUS website.
One remains only to say that Berg v. Obama was dismissed today.
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm
Donofrio, Wrotnowski, Schneller, Berg applications and Lightfoot all removed. I checked the other 2008 cases having nothing to do with Obama and those are still there.
Have you seen Obamah's certified birth certificate? Do you think that thing we've seen is actually a birth certificate?
The bar association that keeps all these filing records separate from SCOTUS also doesn’t have anything for Taitz (record from results isn’t related).
Is this her real name or is this like Polarik using a ‘pen’ name?
Don't bet on it.
The president can’t take cases off the USSC docket, but if he had a mole serving as a clerk with the Court it is possible.
“…while watching ABC News coverage of the inauguration with my wife over lunch, hosts Charles Gibson and Diane Sawyer were joined by Donna Brazile, a Democratic African-American author, educator and political activist, who gave a humorous account of her snatching the complementary fleece blanket she found abandoned in Barack Obama’s chair after the swearing-in ceremony. Apparently she wanted a souvenir of the momentous occasion and when the opportunity arose, she took it. “As they all laughed about it, Gibson responded playfully to her candid admission by saying: “We’re going to check with the legal staff and find out if that’s a felony or a misdemeanor.” Brazile then gave a stern look into the camera and said: “We have a black president – it’s neither.”
well, yes, you are right. If you read my post I did not challenge the court on this. I just stated MY opinion. If this is indeed what the court has decided, so be it, but they are wrong here.
Interesting, they don’t even have January 23rd scheduled as a briefing day.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/casedistribution/casedistributionschedule2008.pdf
Orly Taitz - #223433
Current Status: Active
This member is active and may practice law in California.
See below for more details.
Profile Information
Bar Number 223433
Address 26302 La Paz #211
Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Phone Number (949) 683-5411
Fax Number (949) 586-2082
e-mail Not Available
District District 8 Undergraduate School Hebrew Univ; Jerusalem Israel
County Orange Law School William Howard Taft Univ; Santa Ana CA
Sections None
Status History
Effective Date Status Change
Present Active
12/3/2002 Admitted to The State Bar of California
Explanation of member status
oops, never mind, ignore that, I was looking at distribution date, not conference date.
Google’s cache of http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a524.htm. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jan 17, 2009 23:15:20 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Full version
These search terms are highlighted: lightfoot bowen These terms only appear in links pointing to this page: docket
No. 08A524
Title:
Gail Lightfoot, et al., Applicants
v.
Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S168690)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 12 2008 Application (08A524) for a stay pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 17 2008 Application (08A524) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 29 2008 Application (08A524) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 7 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 23, 2009.
Jan 7 2009 Application (08A524) referred to the Court.
Jan 13 2009 Suggestion for recusal received from applicant.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioners:
Orly Taitz 26302 La Paz (949) 683-5411
Counsel of Record Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Party name: Gail Lightfoot, et al.
Who did she request be recused from the case on the 13th?
Orly Taitz is her real name.
You both missed the salient point. It’s silly for the blog poster to have suggested Obama deleted the cases from the docket. And silly for anyone on FR to support some a silly suggestion.
I am all for the NBC cases going forward, and the Court requiring the evidence be presented by Obama to settle the matter one way or the other.
But suggesting Obama or any President could have cases removed from the USSC Docket is silly.
It was a cut and paste post from plains radio, pay attention.
Here is a better link for 35:
http://74.125.47.132/search?hl=en&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.supremecourtus.gov%2Fdocket%2F08a524.htm&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
Interesting.. even closed cases are kept on record..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.