[FreeAtlanta]

Go to link to read more. She is a good author and researcher.

[null and void]

ping

[autumnraine]

She makes very good points about the fraternizing of the SCOTUS and POTUS.

[Political Junkie Too]

Ah... the end game is in sight.

Because of appearances of impropriety, all nine justices will recuse themelves from this case.

-PJ

[mkjessup]

It’s a great article, although Lynn Stuter might want to be sure that her affairs are in order, as she’ll be one of the first to be rounded up and shipped off to whatever gulag opens up in her region of the USSPR (United States Socialist Peoples Republic).

[Aurorales]

Thanks for posting.

It is a good article.

This inappropriate behavior by the SCOTUS was and is wrong. No amount of excuses and explanations given by some FReepers are acceptable.

Right is right, and this wasn't.

And thanks for the Ping LucyT!

[CyberAnt]

Well .. what if the Chief Justice realized that taking the case before a court where the media would be listening might prove uncomfortable for the country and cause a Constitutional crisis.

What if the Chief Justice told the new President - either produce a birth certificate or you’re out of office.

Wouldn’t anybody want to avoid a Constitutional crisis - especially since 95% of all the blacks in this country would tear it apart if they thought for one moment - the white man - took away their black president.

I just wish a little more common sense would prevail in the world .. it would save a lot of hyperventilating.

[M-cubed]

Very good link!.....I'm involved in schools in a small way....puts a good handle on a bigger picture

Ill be using that as reference in the future.... Thanks!

[Danae]

The skinny in DC is that Barry’s Real Immigration status is going to be covered up. Official and unofficial DC considers having an unconstitutional President LESS dangerous than the civil unrest throwing his worthless ass out on to the curb where it belongs.

Yea it makes me sick.

[Lurking Libertarian]

The invitation of Chief Justice Roberts, the behind closed door meeting with a man who is the subject of lawsuits coming before the Supreme Court concerning his eligibility to the office of president, was not only inappropriate but leaves questionable the judicial conduct of the justices with whom AKA and Biden met.

Has everybody forgotten the time that Scalia and Cheney went hunting while the Supreme Court was deliberating a case against Cheney? What is illegal is for a judge to talk to a party about the case.

Seeing as-- unlike Bush v. Gore-- the Supreme Court has not agreed to hear any case against Obama, I'm sure whatever Obama and the Justices talked about, it wasn't the cases against Obama.

[Colonel_Flagg]

In December 2000, the court decided the case of Bush v. Gore by a 5-4 vote, ending the legal battle over the contested Florida election and effectively sealing the presidency for Bush."

The media fallacy is repeated. The vote was 7-2. The vote on remedy was 5-4. And, as they say, you could look it up. But why bother, when the media's purpose is to cook the books?