[mlo]

"It’s all plausible. What’s more, is anyone in Hawaii in 1961 could have registered a birth. Regardless of where the baby was actually born, he could easily have been born in Kenya and brought to Hawaii and then registered as having been born at a STREET ADDRESS as opposed to a hospital. He would then have a Hawaii Certificate of birth, but still have been born in Kenya. All it would take would be for his mom and a witness to lie. No one would have asked for any proof whats so ever."

What is your proof for this claim?

[Danae]

I was born there and lived there. I know how they work. I lived it. And yes I DO have a long form Birth Certificate and a Certificate of live birth. Its EASY to see the spaces where you can list a Hospital OR a street address where the birth took place. If you went into the right office with a witness to sign no one would have asked any questions at all.

[calex59]

Danae commented:"It’s all plausible. What’s more, is anyone in Hawaii in 1961 could have registered a birth. Regardless of where the baby was actually born, he could easily have been born in Kenya and brought to Hawaii and then registered as having been born at a STREET ADDRESS as opposed to a hospital. He would then have a Hawaii Certificate of birth, but still have been born in Kenya. All it would take would be for his mom and a witness to lie. No one would have asked for any proof whats so ever."

Mlo responded: What is your proof for this claim?

Mlo, you might want to take a reading comprehension course so you would be able to understand the difference between a claim and a supposition. There is one claim in Danae's remarks and that is that you can have a birth certified in Hawaii without being born there. It is done all the time, and in fact Bozo's sister has a certification of live birth from Hawaii but was born in Indonesia. This is known.

The rest of Danae's comment was supposition and no claims were made so no proof required.