Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Insurance Options for Workers Laid Off
New York Times ^ | 28 JAN 2009 | Robert Pear

Posted on 01/27/2009 7:42:55 PM PST by Libertarian444

WASHINGTON — The stimulus bill working its way through Congress is not just a package of spending increases and tax cuts intended to jolt the nation out of recession. For Democrats, it is also a tool for rewriting the social contract with the poor, the uninsured and the unemployed, in ways they have long yearned to do.

With little notice and no public hearings, House Democrats would create a temporary new entitlement allowing workers getting unemployment checks to qualify for Medicaid, the health program for low-income people. Spouses and children could also receive benefits, no matter how much money the family had.

“It’s raining money,” said Representative Michael C. Burgess, Republican of Texas.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cobra; healthcare; insurance; jobs; obama
With little notice and no public hearings, House Democrats would create a temporary new entitlement..

Temporary....snort, yeah good one, riiiight......

1 posted on 01/27/2009 7:42:55 PM PST by Libertarian444
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

Pretty soon it will pay more to be unemployed than employed.


2 posted on 01/27/2009 7:47:51 PM PST by Col. Bob (To give in is to commit national suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

Then they need a ‘temporary’ tax to fund it, rinse, repeat.


3 posted on 01/27/2009 7:48:41 PM PST by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
“Democrats said the current economic crisis did not allow time for public hearings on the legislation.

“This is as urgent as it gets,” said Representative Anna G. Eshoo, Democrat of California.”

Yet another “crisis” to ram through bad legislation and hook the public and states on the Federal drug of money.

4 posted on 01/27/2009 7:51:59 PM PST by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
Under the bill, the federal government would pay 65 percent of the premiums for a year. That subsidy would almost surely increase the number of laid-off workers choosing to continue coverage.

Republicans wanted to deny the premium subsidies to people who had annual incomes of more than $100,000 or assets of more than $1 million. They also wanted to prevent people with more than $1 million of family income from taking advantage of the Medicaid option for the unemployed.

Democrats voted down those proposals in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Representative Nathan Deal, Republican of Georgia, said “the poorest of the poor” had long been subject to income and asset tests when applying for Medicaid. But, Mr. Deal argued, under the new option, a millionaire could get Medicaid benefits, financed entirely by the federal government, without being asked about such matters.

Unbelievable!!!!

5 posted on 01/27/2009 7:55:24 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

How about cable TV and broadband internet for workers laid off ?


6 posted on 01/27/2009 8:05:38 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob
Pretty soon it will pay more to be unemployed than employed.

A variation on the old healthcare quote. If you think your jobs pays you a lot now, just wait till you are unemployed !

7 posted on 01/27/2009 8:07:25 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: libh8er

I may very well be out of work on April 1st-new cuts. No way I can afford insurance...I have a pre-existing condition so that’s that. What is wrong with temporarily letting the unemployed keep some form of insurance during this economic tsunami?


8 posted on 01/27/2009 8:09:35 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Under the bill, the federal government would pay 65 percent of the premiums for a year.

Man, that's a relief! I thought us taxpayers would have to pay for it.

Good thing the federal government has got its own money to pay for this sort of thing...

9 posted on 01/27/2009 8:11:09 PM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: The man who created The Sock-Puppet Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444
Atlas Puked...
10 posted on 01/27/2009 8:13:41 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Yeah, that’s the ticket, the federal government will pay! /sarc

The cost of this program will be huge. COBRA runs at least a thousand a month, 65% will be around $650 per month that the government will pay. There has to be influence by the insurance lobby in there somewhere.

Another thing is with expanding Medicaid, it will make the list of doctors who don’t take Medicaid grow, IMHO. Seeing an occasional Medicaid patient is one thing, being inundated with Medicaid patients would force a doctor to shut down his practice (not enough money in Medicaid alone to run a practice.)


11 posted on 01/27/2009 8:16:13 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob
Pretty soon it will pay more to be unemployed than employed.

And have an unbroken chain of straight-party voters for
The Democratic Party for multiple generations.

Which was the Prime Objective of FDR.
And of BHO.

At least in the latter case...
I blame RETARDS like the Democrats of Wall Street.
The appointed Republicans like Chris Cox.
And the Invisible-In-The-Last-Year President George W. Bush.
(W passed the moral courage test when attacking after 9-11.
And flunked the moral courage test when he didn't fire Chris Cox
in the fall of 2008. IMHO.)
12 posted on 01/27/2009 8:20:15 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob

Wow, if I got really sick and needed expensive medical treatment, it might be better for my boss to lay me off and just pay the unemployment.

Does anyone in our government actually have any activity between their brain cells that might fire off a real thought? This road show gets more stupid by the day.

Just wow.


13 posted on 01/27/2009 8:21:37 PM PST by auntyfemenist (If only FDR could come on TV again to encourage us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob
"Pretty soon it will pay more to be unemployed than employed."

Only if you're not white.

14 posted on 01/27/2009 8:23:13 PM PST by XenaLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Col. Bob

You know, there is nothing wrong with a lifeline when you need it. I had a nice, growing business for almost 10 years providing advertiwsing photography to the RV and Marine industry. Both of those industries crashed in the blink of an eye takng my business and many others with it. That crash cost me dearly and while Im not proud of th3e fact, unemployment for both the wife and I are all thats keeping us afloat. Health insurance is a big issue, its cost us 60o bucks a month for $2500 deductable insureance, insurance I MUST retain due to the fact my medical history will preclude me from ever getting another policy.

I’ve never needed nor ask for govermental help in my 56 years but things are nearly out of control.

So cut good, conservative people some slack....


15 posted on 01/27/2009 8:41:46 PM PST by photoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: photoguy

That is exactly what the programs were created for. If that is what they were used for, I cannot think of one conservative who would say a word. If they would make it temporary, lifetime maximums, and disallow any children conceived AFTER benefits began to discourage lifetime appoinntments to welfare(workfare would be a better description) this country would not be in the mess it is in. I feel your pain, hubby out of work 3.5 months now, no unemployment, my job and Gods good grace keeping us going. No health insurance, but he is supposedly starting a job w/the fed govt next week. Did not yet get the call for the start date, either the 2nd or the 17th, hoping for the former. Good luck to you in this downturn. Hubby was out of work b/c we had to close hvac company we started 3 yrs ago.


16 posted on 01/27/2009 8:52:23 PM PST by wombtotomb (since its "above his paygrade", why can't we err on the side of caution about when life begins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libertarian444

Most “regular” people will be fairly appalled by the state of public healthcare. The lines and waits for care are amazing in most facilities. The poor folks there have learned to live with it, and often brag of the “free” medicines, etc.

However, regular, unemployed folks may take the wrong lessons their peek at the inside of the public system.

The reason the lines are long are NOT because of a lack of funding. It’s because “free” public care is ALWAYS this way, everywhere in the world.


17 posted on 01/27/2009 9:20:07 PM PST by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson