Posted on 01/28/2009 1:19:08 AM PST by bruinbirdman
I know that World leaders are fully accustomed to conducting business with all manner of criminals, terrorists, dictators and other illegitimate leaders of Nations.
But Obama may be different, as no one knows his real name, his place of birth, who his true parents are or even his actual birth date.
Every relationship must contain an element of trust. Without trust, marriages, business relations, families and friendships are destroyed. At the least, constructive progress is stymied.
America is said repeatedly, to be a Nation of Laws. It is not. It is a Nation under the control of mob rule. When the American public understands that, America will be a Nation of Anarchy.
Obama not only refuses to show proof that he is eligible to become President of the United States of America, but he has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to prohibit any one from discovering his true identity or his history.
Because Obama is not eligible to be the President of the United States, any agreements he makes are subject to change or removal by the current American government of by future administrations, far into the future. Any and all agreements he makes gives foreign powers permission to deny them, rescind them or renege on them, far into the future.
Any orders he gives to the American military are subject to being refused. Orders that Obama gives to Americas Joint Chiefs of Staff of the military can be refused. If Obama doesnt like a particular Chief of Staff, or all of them, theoretically, he can fire them and replace them with new Staff. But even the order to fire a Chief or to demand his resignation can be lawfully refused by that Chief of Staff.
The security and abilities of NATO are being compromised as well as current agreements and Treaties around the World.
The only power Obama will have is that which is illegally permitted by a corrupt government.
The United States Congress is required, under the US Code of Federal Regulations to count the Electoral College votes for President and Vice President, ask if any member of Congress objects to the count and hear that Congressmans objection. This is under Title 3, Chapter 1, Section 15, Upon such reading of any such certificate of paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.
The US Code can be found by clicking here, or go to this URL: http://uscode.house.gov/
January 8, 2009, the President of the US Senate, Dick Cheney and the US Congress failed to abide by the US Code of Federal Regulations by not calling for objections. You will see this failure on this video below, at the 20 minute point. Stay watching the video and you will see that as Dick Cheney is reading, some commotion happens on the floor of Congress, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of The House, jumps up and starts clapping hysterically and then you will hear rambunctious applause by Congress, for no apparent reason. As the camera pans the Congress members you will see that some are not clapping and there is one man with his arm up in the air. Click here to see the video or go to this URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGt8hQZzg4&feature=related
It may appear that an objection was raised and that whoever was attempting to make that objection was shouted down by the mob.
By the inaction of the President of the Senate to call for objections, the certification of the Electoral votes was illegally obtained. This is another reason that makes Obama ineligible to be President, as well as neutering the US Congress.
By Congress illegally certifying an ineligible person for President they have violated their oath to defend the American Constitution. They have proven that the highest oath they can promise to, means nothing to them. Their word, their promises, their oaths, their agreements and the existence of their lives are totally worthless to an honest society.
A concern of all World leaders should be: Are these the kinds of people we can do business with? Where can trust be found amongst a group of people who do not respect and obey their own laws and rules? I accept that doing business with criminal organizations is a part of government function, but many World leaders have been embarrassed or removed for consorting with a liar.
There are oven one dozen lawsuits against Obama, asking for proof that he is eligible to become President. To see them got to: http://americamustknow.com/lawsuits.aspx
Phillip Berg has a case before the US Supreme Court. All documents can be found at Obamacrimes.com.
Dr. Orly Taitz has a case before the US Supreme Court and has any military people as plaintiffs. Her case can be seen here: http://drorly.blogspot.com/ Various well funded groups have vowed to continue suing him against every decision he makes.
No State or county or city in America has to obey his orders or his laws or any laws passed by an illegally operating Congress. In fact, it can be argued, and probably will, that any person arrested for any crime in America can use, as his defense, that no laws in America are valid because of Americas illegally operating Congress and an ineligible President.
The American Congress and the ineligible President have themselves proven, that they have no respect of rules, regulations or laws.
What Nation would be naïve enough to think that their agreements with America would be honored? What Nation can guarantee to its people that Treaties or agreements of any sort will be honored by future American administrations?
International gangster operations succeed because the members have a relationship of some degree of trust. Trust is an unknown and non-existent factor for Obama.
Every Nation on Earth that has taken the path of secrecy and refusal to obey the Rules of The Game such as Obama and his allies are taking America on, have failed. More importantly, they have left their gullible Partner Nations in misery and chaos.
Obama and his supporters are international con men. They have much money and power, but they are stupid and most likely insane. History has proven this to be a very dangerous combination.
This is what all World leaders must consider: You can protect yourself from a burglar or an armed robber, but the only protection from a liar, is to deny communications with him.
Monarchical laws, the right of divine kingship.
The EXACT thing we revolted from about 200+ years ago.
Pravda?
Pravda, the news thats not afraid of Obama.
Pretty soon all the major news outlets will be broadcasting the facts of the messiah, meanwhile the MSM will still be on its knees.
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
It might be Pravda, but it’s the same MARK McGREW:
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/2009/01/mark-s-mcgrew-obama-deceiver-cheat.html
Monday, January 5, 2009
Mark S. McGrew: ‘Obama: Deceiver, Cheat, Swindler, Liar, Fraudster, Con Artist’
There is still time, but the time is well past due, for treating Sovereign American Citizens with basic honesty and respect. This has also gotten to be a time for some venting — I.O.
By Mark S. McGrew
We know that Obama is a liar about so many things.
The question of whether or not he is in fact, a Natural Born Citizen and eligible to be President of The United States of America, has no importance anymore. The question of eligibility has evolved far beyond that simple question, with such a simple solution, that Obama refuses to provide. The government of Kenya has put a Gag Order on his family not to talk to reporters.
What we dont know, what there is absolutely no proof of, is his place of birth, his true father or his mother. Without a verifiable Birth Certificate, none of this, including his actual date of birth can be proven or believed...READ MORE...
U.S.Code Title 3, Chapter 1, Section 15 is here:
starting on the 20th line...
Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.
Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and
concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed
by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives
before the same shall be received.
............................................................
Since Cheney, the President of the Senate, did not call for “...objections, if any.”, that seems to indicate that there was not received any written objection signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives.
See video of Cheney here at 2min 40sec:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TngxeuRrfik&feature=related
“January 8, 2009, the President of the US Senate, Dick Cheney and the US Congress failed to abide by the US Code of Federal Regulations by not calling for objections. You will see this failure on this video below, at the 20 minute point. Stay watching the video and you will see that as Dick Cheney is reading, some commotion happens on the floor of Congress, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of The House, jumps up and starts clapping hysterically and then you will hear rambunctious applause by Congress, for no apparent reason. As the camera pans the Congress members you will see that some are not clapping and there is one man with his arm up in the air. Click here to see the video or go to this URL:”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGt8hQZzg4&feature=related
I had to watch it twice...Cheney was about to continue reading when he was interrupted, Nancy stands up, she’s clapping and encouraging others to clap with her...the man with his hand up, he keeps it there, but no one is taking any notice of him.
If Cheney was aware he left something of the proceedings out, like asking if there are any objections, it certainly doesn’t show on his smiling face.
Pravda is more concerned about the U.S. Constitution than any American mainstream media.
Fred, it seems that we both went to the video to check out the article’s claim of something left out, or some unseen objection (please see my post #8 about objections).
Cheney had just declared the election of a new President and Vice-President. I believe that is why Pelosi started the applause at that point, which is not “for no reason” (the wording in the Pravda article above).
It does appear that Cheney was interrupted, but what he might have been about to add we might never know...from appearances it would seem if he did have anything important to add, he would have been able to continue, but he did not.
Not much to disagree with. We are indeed being ruled by a criminal fascist syndicate.
And once the majority of citizens see that we no longer live under the rule of law, anarchy will follow.
“Because Obama is not eligible to be the President of the United States, any agreements he makes are subject to change or removal by the current American government of by future administrations, far into the future. Any and all agreements he makes gives foreign powers permission to deny them, rescind them or renege on them, far into the future. “
And this is why Obama is a joke to the world. They ALL KNOW THIS and are all smarter than over half of America (and a good portion of Freepers it seems who would rather let him sit then face ‘race riots’. Thank God they weren’t around during the Revolution). They understand that any agreement made with him could be overturned at ANY TIME so it is pointless to invest much time and energy into them.
This is the meme here folks. Whether you believe he was born in Hawaii or not, the question is there. And rather than PROVE it, he is continuing to fight to the Supreme Court for God sake for “privacy” and yet those same privacy advocates have no problem requiring fingerprinting of teachers, police officers, and others for background checks. Yet want to let go the person in charge of our nuclear codes.
I still haven’t figured out even if you believe he is a natural born citizen (which could still be argued even if born in Hawaii), why go to so much trouble to convince others to drop it.
Regardless, the other nations recognize what a powder keg this could be. Shame Americans can’t.
Yep, but tell me any MSM outlet anywhere in America that would print what he writes.
That’s because Russia doesn’t trust anything he has to say or do. They know at any time it can be ripped out as unconstitutional since an unconstitutional President signed it.
Indeed we are very close to mob rule. See Chicago politics.
We can restore it all with a simple policy: No representation without taxation. Not that I love taxes, just that governments should not be elected primarily by the recipients of government largesse (read "distributing confiscated money").
Oh nonsense!
I dont mind you knocking “B.O.” but please, divine right of kings was well dead by 1776.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.