Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Suggested FDR’s ‘New Deal’ Was Too Small, House Republicans Say
CNS News ^ | 1/29/2009 | Josiah Ryan

Posted on 01/29/2009 4:56:18 AM PST by markomalley



President Barack Obama (AP Photo)
(CNSNews.com) - In a closed-door meeting with House Republicans on Tuesday to discuss the $819-billion economic stimulus bill, President Obama suggested that Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal failed because it was too small, Reps. Steve King (R-Iowa) and Rob Bishop (R-Utah), who attended the meeting, told CNSNews.com.
 
“FDR’s initial steps did actually work,” Obama said at the meeting, according to King. Obama went on to say, “Then he [FDR] pulled back towards a balanced budget, and then what you had was a recession within a depression. Then World War II came along and was the biggest stimulus plan ever.”
 
The White House did not respond to requests for verification of Obama’s comments, and several Republicans who were in the meeting said they either did not remember the remarks or would not discuss the details of the conversation in public.
 
King said he interpreted Obama’s comment as an indicator of Democrats’ mindset on stimulus spending.
 

“I take it this way,” King told CNSNews.com on Wednesday. “If FDR had not essentially lost his nerve and pulled back towards a balanced budget, he would have spent more money, the New Deal would have been a bigger deal, and it would have then brought us out of the Depression. That mindset tells us what’s driving this stimulus approach.”


Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) (Photo courtesy of King's congressional Web site)
Bishop was also critical of Obama’s remarks.
 
“It was his [Obama’s] revisionist view of history which is inaccurate,” said Bishop. “I have heard that history from other people, and I think it’s inaccurate.”
 
In an interview with CNSNews.com on Jan. 8, House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) was asked about FDR’s spending in the Depression and the current economic stimulus proposals.
 
“Well, a lot of economists tell us that what President Roosevelt failed to do was to spend as much money as was needed to get people back to work and get the economy moving again,” said Waxman. “And it wasn’t until World War II, when we had major expenditures, that the Depression was finally resolved.”  Watch Video

 
The $819 billion stimulus package passed in the House of Representatives Wednesday evening, on a vote of 244 to 188 – no Republicans voted in favor of the package.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: bho2009; bho44; democrats; economy; fdr; federaslspending; newdeal; obamaregime; socialism; stimulus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last

1 posted on 01/29/2009 4:56:19 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“Then World War II came along and was the biggest stimulus plan ever.”

Hmmmm?


2 posted on 01/29/2009 4:59:08 AM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
OK, so zero will start ww3 with Iran and all Muslims, but not nefore he enables dangerous cels within the countries that will be the "Allies".

The "Axis" is zero's super bowl pick.

Anyone know the over and under?

3 posted on 01/29/2009 5:01:01 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Just some more BS from the retards now running this counrty...into the ground.

They speak thir native language..lie.


4 posted on 01/29/2009 5:01:02 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

***The $819 billion stimulus package passed in the House of Representatives Wednesday evening, on a vote of 244 to 188 – no Republicans voted in favor of the package.***

Let’s hope they continue to show some balls for the next 4 years.


5 posted on 01/29/2009 5:02:45 AM PST by djsherin (The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Obama is next Jimmy Carter...”one & done!”


6 posted on 01/29/2009 5:03:02 AM PST by kellynla (Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Obama’s brain is too small.

“You can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

But with a fully complicit media, you can fool most for long enough these days.


7 posted on 01/29/2009 5:05:15 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

He very may well be the next FDR (God forbid). If he can convince people the the cure is more government like FDR did during the Depression, he can always say, “Think about how bad things would be if we hadn’t done anything”. I think that would mark the final blow to what semblance of capitalism we still have in this country.


8 posted on 01/29/2009 5:06:08 AM PST by djsherin (The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
This proves conclusively Barack Obama has no clue as to how the real world works. He has never lived and worked in it.

I believe Margaret Thatcher said socialism works until you run out of other people's money.

I'd like to add the corollary "Productive people quickly figure out they are being robbed and stop producing fruit to be stolen by others."

If productivity only benefits the non-productive, why bother?

9 posted on 01/29/2009 5:06:10 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin

If 2 plus 2 is 4...still, and there still exists in the UNIVERSE the laws of sowing and reaping, I don’t know HOW we can pay the bill in 20 years, if we can’t pay them NOW. Borrowing money when you can’t pay what you OWE now never have seen it bring prosperity and financial strength and security to any home, any business, any school, any bank. So, do we just keep borrowing money to make it a bigger deal? Am I weird for saying that this doesn’t make sense?


10 posted on 01/29/2009 5:06:30 AM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Without real (ie, non-government) jobs, no stimulus can do much good.


11 posted on 01/29/2009 5:07:13 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
WWII was not a stimulus for anything sustainable, it was the biggest malinvestment of all time. What got the economy moving was savings and major sacrifice by civilians which turned into long term investments after the war.

The Democratic stimulus has lots of similarity to the war spending. They will dump tons of money into ratholes (e.g. alternative energy). A small portion of the spending will stimulate some sustainable growth. The rest will just suck energy (the real thing) and savings from the productive economy. Ultimately the deficits created will raise market interest rates and further stifle the economy (unless they monetize and inflate to keep rates low).

12 posted on 01/29/2009 5:10:33 AM PST by palmer (Some third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Let’s hope they continue to show some balls for the next 4 years.

Obamalamadingdong wanted at least a few Republicans to vote for it so he'd have cover and he'd be able to say that it was a "bipartisan" effort. It'd be great if the Senate would take a lesson from the House and do the same thing, although I doubt they will. If they did Obamalamadingdong and the 'Rats in Congress would own this one all by their lonesome. No doubt about it.

13 posted on 01/29/2009 5:11:50 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Government is not the solution to the problem. Government IS the problem - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

You’re not weird. We can only sell as much debt as people are willing to buy, and ultimately that can’t go on forever. If the government wants tot continue it’s insane deficit spending, it can always monetize, meaning the federal reserve buys the debt and prints money to pay for it. They’re probably doing some of that now anyway.

The only way I see out of this down the road is the ultimate destruction of the dollar through monetizing (massive inflation) or a default on government debt. That may be awhile down the way, but I just don’t see how we can ever pay this money back.


14 posted on 01/29/2009 5:12:39 AM PST by djsherin (The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

OMG, we are SO screwed.


15 posted on 01/29/2009 5:12:59 AM PST by thecabal (Keep The Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That is how liberalism always works. Whatever huge program they’ve instituted that hasn’t worked (and usually has proven counterproductive) has only failed in their minds because it wasn’t huge enough!

Another way to look at it, because as PJ O’Rourke says liberalism is communism sold by the drink, the liberals are never satisfied with a full glass when thinking of at all the courage they could get from the bottles behind the bar.


16 posted on 01/29/2009 5:14:24 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Let’s hope. Unfortunately, this is the Senate we’re talking about.


17 posted on 01/29/2009 5:14:45 AM PST by djsherin (The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All

Just one word. Delusional. Amen.


18 posted on 01/29/2009 5:16:33 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Sadly, defense spending wont bailus out this time

First, ALL the jet engine makers have more than 60% of their production doen overseas, and that means they employ less than 20% of their original work force here in the US, and any money sent there to build engines for new aircraft would actually create more jobs OVERSEAS than here!

Second, there ar no programs that are new that can be started within 3 years of today.

Ony those already in the pipeline would even work and most of them wont start for another year

Third, the environmental Nazis would fight any new project/plan/construction to keep themselves alive.

Fourth: DEMOCRATS HATE THE MILITARY, so they wont do any military spending stimulus anyways.


19 posted on 01/29/2009 5:19:40 AM PST by RaceBannon (We have sown the wind, but we will reap the whirlwind. NObama. Not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: palmer

***WWII was not a stimulus for anything sustainable, it was the biggest malinvestment of all time. What got the economy moving was savings and major sacrifice by civilians which turned into long term investments after the war.***

Yeah, just because we were producing a lot and had full employment didn’t mean the economy was fundamentally sound. And it’s not as if the production went towards goods that raised our standard of living.

***A small portion of the spending will stimulate some sustainable growth.***

IMO, at the expense of private sector growth.

***Ultimately the deficits created will raise market interest rates and further stifle the economy (unless they monetize and inflate to keep rates low).***

If interest rates go up, the amount of interest paid on the debt goes through the roof, further increasing the debt. But like you said, there’s always monetizing...


20 posted on 01/29/2009 5:20:57 AM PST by djsherin (The federal government:: Because someone has to f*** things up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson