Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican Official: Bishops Have no Choice But to Refuse Communion to Pro-Abort Politicians
LifeSiteNews ^ | 2/4/09 | Hilary White

Posted on 02/04/2009 11:59:01 AM PST by wagglebee

ROME, January 30, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Archbishop Raymond Burke, in an exclusive interview last week, told LifeSiteNews.com that the issue of pro-abortion politicians continuing to receive Holy Communion is still one of major concern and that it is the duty of bishops to ensure that they are refused.

He told LifeSiteNews.com, "I don't understand the continual debate that goes on about it. There's not a question that a Catholic who publicly, and after admonition, supports pro-abortion legislation is not to receive Holy Communion and is not to be given Holy Communion."

"The Church's law is very clear," said Archbishop Burke, who was appointed last year by Pope Benedict XVI as the head of the Church's highest court, the Apostolic Signatura. "The person who persists publicly in grave sin is to be denied Holy Communion, and it [Canon Law] doesn't say that the bishop shall decide this. It's an absolute."

Among the US bishops directly to address the issue, Archbishop Burke was one of around a dozen who vigorously supported a directive of the Vatican that said pro-abortion Catholic politicians "must be refused" Holy Communion if they attempt to receive at Mass. Others have refused to abide by the Vatican instruction and the Church's own Code of Canon Law, saying they would rather focus on "education" of such politicians.

Archbishop Burke called "nonsense" the accusation, regularly made by some bishops, that refusing Holy Communion "makes the Communion rail a [political] battle ground". In fact, he said, the precise opposite is true. The politician who insists on being seen receiving Holy Communion, despite his opposition to the Church's central teachings, is using that reception for political leverage.

In 2004, when self-proclaimed Catholic and candidate for the Democrat party, Sen. John Kerry, was frequently photographed receiving Holy Communion despite his vigorous support of abortion, the US Bishops Conference issued a document which said only that it is up to individual bishops whether to implement the Church's code of Canon Law and refuse Communion. The issue has remained prominent with the appointment of Joe Biden, another pro-abortion Catholic politician, as Vice President of the United States of America.

Archbishop Burke recalled previous experiences with Kerry, pointing to the several occasions when the senator was pictured in Time magazine receiving Communion from Papal representatives at various public events. Burke said that it is clear that Kerry was using his reception of Holy Communion to send a message.

"He wants to not only receive Holy Communion from a bishop but from the papal representative. I think that's what his point was. Get it in Time magazine, so people read it and say to themselves, 'He must be in good standing'."

"What are they doing? They're using the Eucharist as a political tool."

In refusing, far from politicising the Eucharist, the Church is returning the matter to its religious reality. The most important reasons to refuse, he said, are pastoral and religious in nature.

"The Holy Eucharist, the most sacred reality of our life in the Church, has to be protected against sacrilege. At the same time, individuals have to be protected for the sake of their own salvation from committing one of the gravest sins, namely to receive Holy Communion unworthily."

Archbishop Burke also dismissed the commonly proffered excuse that such politicians need more "education". Speaking from his own direct experience, he said that Catholic politicians who are informed by their pastors or bishops that their positions in support of pro-abortion legislation makes it impossible for them to receive Holy Communion, "I've always found that they don't come forward."

"When you talk to these people, they know," he said. "They know what they're doing is very wrong. They have to answer to God for that, but why through our pastoral negligence add on to that, that they have to answer to God for who knows how many unworthy receptions of Holy Communion?"

Archbishop Burke said that the issue had been debated enough. He rejected the idea that the matter should be left to the US Conference of Catholic Bishops, saying the Conference has no authority in the matter. "This is a law of the universal Church and it should be applied."

"I think this argument too is being used by people who don't want to confront the issue, this whole 'wait 'til the Conference decides'...well the Conference has been discussing this since at least 2004. And nothing happens."

When asked what the solution was, he responded, "Individual bishops and priests simply have to do their duty. They have to confront politicians, Catholic politicians, who are sinning gravely and publicly in this regard. And that's their duty.

"And if they carry it out, not only can they not be reproached for that, but they should be praised for confronting this situation."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholic; communion; moralabsolutes; proabortpoliticians; prolife; raymondburke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
"The Church's law is very clear," said Archbishop Burke, who was appointed last year by Pope Benedict XVI as the head of the Church's highest court, the Apostolic Signatura. "The person who persists publicly in grave sin is to be denied Holy Communion, and it [Canon Law] doesn't say that the bishop shall decide this. It's an absolute."

Then this needs to start IMMEDIATELY!

1 posted on 02/04/2009 11:59:02 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser; NYer; Pyro7480

Pro-Life/Catholic ping for you lists


2 posted on 02/04/2009 11:59:52 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’d like to hear the pope say this.


3 posted on 02/04/2009 12:00:00 PM PST by RexBeach ("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 02/04/2009 12:00:27 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Excellent! I hope this does begin, starting with Biden, Pelosi, and De Lauro (the woman who was behind that offensive letter just sent to the Pope by a bunch of our congress creeps).

If you thought they were upset about the SSPX, wait till this happens.


5 posted on 02/04/2009 12:02:19 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

And if they don’t, they are actively encouraging others to sin, thus risking their own chance at salvation. Nobody said it was supposed to be easy to beethe bishop.


6 posted on 02/04/2009 12:03:51 PM PST by ichabod1 (Change is not a destination, Hope is not a strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
"I’d like to hear the pope say this."

You just did. You just didn't see his lips move.

7 posted on 02/04/2009 12:04:47 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law; RexBeach
You just did. You just didn't see his lips move.

Exactly, Archbishop Burke would not be saying this without the full support of the Pope.

8 posted on 02/04/2009 12:06:15 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

>>Archbishop Burke called “nonsense” the accusation, regularly made by some bishops, that refusing Holy Communion “makes the Communion rail a [political] battle ground”. In fact, he said, the precise opposite is true. The politician who insists on being seen receiving Holy Communion, despite his opposition to the Church’s central teachings, is using that reception for political leverage. <<

Please forward to Bishop of Wilmington, DE. He refuses to use the Eucharist as a political tool. So Biden is welcome, abortion and all.


9 posted on 02/04/2009 12:06:18 PM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What about all the non-politician Catholics who voted for Obama? What about them?


10 posted on 02/04/2009 12:06:47 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

They need to have a very public press conference, read all the names of the scum-bag politicians that believe in killing unborns and newly born babies, and EXCOMMUNICATE THEM in the most vocal way possible.

And THEN deny them the sacraments . . . PUBLICLY AND WITH FANFARE!


11 posted on 02/04/2009 12:08:23 PM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

I think that’s more of a gray area because the voters are not voting on abortion per se.


12 posted on 02/04/2009 12:08:27 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey

I agree.


13 posted on 02/04/2009 12:09:16 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Mr. Kerry! Mr. John Kerry to the white courtesy phone!
14 posted on 02/04/2009 12:11:48 PM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Quite right. I know.

However, it would carry much more weight if the Holy Father said it himself.

That would be a stunner.


15 posted on 02/04/2009 12:11:49 PM PST by RexBeach ("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
However, it would carry much more weight if the Holy Father said it himself.

It wouldn't surprise me if he did in the near future.

16 posted on 02/04/2009 12:12:38 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yeah, all the voting democrats who are Catholic and approach for communion, what about them? They put all these pro-death politicians in power. Since the dem voting Catholics obviously separate politics from religion, they will continue to take communion and continue to vote in pro-death candidates. Of course they see nothing wrong with voting for abortionists while parading around as Catholics. Not to pick on Catholics though, plenty of other denominations that are supposedly Christian have lots of dem voters taking communion too. sigh. They don’t get it. They won’t until they meet their Maker.


17 posted on 02/04/2009 12:13:57 PM PST by TheConservativeParty (That's Mrs.Chief Master Sgt. to you sonny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Excatly, Dennis. Amen.


18 posted on 02/04/2009 12:14:54 PM PST by muglywump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DennisR

Well, I hear what you’re saying but how could you realisticly deny communion to BHO voters and pro-abortion Catholics who are private citizens? During communion have the priest say, “Those of you who voted for John McCain please come foward and receive holy communion. Those of you who voted for BHO please remain seated.”

I have nothing but contempt for practicing Catholics who vote Democrat and are pro-abortion. But I don’t see how you could deny private citizens communion. It would mean they would have to publicly declare what they did in the privacy of a voting booth and it would violate the concept of a secret ballot.


19 posted on 02/04/2009 12:17:32 PM PST by Welcome2thejungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
And any Bishop that fails to follow though with this Papal edict should be forced to step down.
20 posted on 02/04/2009 12:19:37 PM PST by 2001convSVT ("Only Property Owners that pay taxes should have the right to Vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson