Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero
Secession should have been handled diplomatically at first and in the mean time the CSA could have built up their military via European help in preparation for a possible future armed conflict. Striking first was just dumb.

War was inevitable, even if your approach were the way things had gone. And the South would still have lost, regardless, for the same reasons they lost in any case: they were not capable of sustaining a total, industrial war such as the Civil War became.

As for "striking first," it was dumb ... and also completely predictable.

15 posted on 02/07/2009 9:00:47 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb; Vaquero

The South ran it alone against an industrialized North. They were doomed to failure unless they had foreign alliances active in the war.

Did they really think that the secession would result in war; that a their brothers to the North would attack them? From what I’ve read in the past, some believed that they would secede and that would be that. They had threats from the Union, but dismissed them as saber rattling.


62 posted on 02/07/2009 10:04:35 AM PST by Loud Mime (Stop the Clown-Car Stimulus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson