Posted on 02/07/2009 9:15:43 AM PST by CARepublicans
What a completely irrelevant requirement for a leader. Regan was on his second marriage when he was elected, Clinton is still married to his first wife. Might as well point out that he can't be smart enough to be president because he didn't go to an Ivy league school.
Our Founding Fathers...And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Yeah, and they are not winning. She is beloved by too many people.
Watch and see, she’ll emerge from this Judd and the big bad wolf thing even more popular than ever. She’s the only politician in years who has stood up to the environmentalist whacko’s, the animal rights whacko’s, the gun control fanatics, and the Global Warming Alarmists, all of which most people are tired of being lectured by.
People need to make a choice.
They are either with the 2010s new conservative movement, (Sarah Palin) or they are a part of the Old Republican party from the 2000s.
and they need to accepted or rejected on that basis.
It is not irrelevant to me. It is important to me that people take family values seriously. I was very young when Reagan became president (sixth grade). Today I think that a leader should lead from home. Just my opinion and we may not ever agree. Obviously I made an exception with McCain so it is not an absolute thing for me but just important.
*********************
S&S, not just the lefties, but the Republican Establishment also. This guy "Ramras" is the Alaskan REPUBLICAN Bush/Murkowski Judiciary Chairman, who tried to bring her down in Troopergate.
Here's his latest attack:
Hope she's speaks at CPAC, wouldn't be surprised if she passes, though.
If Republicans are going to continue to say that they support “family values”, then it seems like having a candidate who actually walks the walk so to speak would be important. To his credit, Limbaugh has not been hypocritical in this regard. I don’t recall him criticizing people for having many marriages and divorces.
If I were Rush, I would run. If I were he, I would also have major security as the Left would like to have him accidentally be eliminated, Clinton-style.
Savage would give a good run for governor against Newsom and/or Feinstein.
They are trying to tie her up and trap her. She needs to tell him where to go.
She is popular enough in Alaska among the voters to go “Harry Truman” on them and give them a piece of her mind.
The leftie media and bloggers FEAR Palin but they will fail with their child like actions to stop her.
Washington is the boat and Rush is the anchor.
We can’t throw the anchor in the boat.
They are trying to tie her up and trap her. She needs to tell them where to go.
*********************
Think you’re right.
“Rush wont EVER run for President.”
He doesn’t appear to be someone who could put up with the BS.
Maybe the neo-cons and pseudo cons (Willardites) will stay home this year.
Vin, I like your site and all you have done in support of Sarah.
But I think you are under estimating the Governor and over estimating Ramras, Ashley Judd and others. The Alaskan and American people know that there are people out to destroy Sarah. Until she really screws up in governing somehow, going to a well off dinner or to CPAC is not going to hurt her very much.
I hope Palin and Rush and the hanful of Southern and Mountain and Midwest conservatives are talking.
Palin and Rush in communication is a very good thing.
I agree. BTW, that's a great family photo on your home page!
I wish I could go...Palin and Rush! Just Damn!!! (in a good way)
I hope there will be some coverage of it on O-Span, so I can tape it.
The pay cut........
what the heck, he could still do his daily noon to 3 from the oval office and Snerdley could be his chief of staff.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.