Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The universe’s birth certificate
CMI ^ | Alexander Williams

Posted on 02/08/2009 3:10:04 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
To: LonePalm
Too bad we can't see 0bama's birth certificate.

Argh beat me to it!!! Blast you!

21 posted on 02/08/2009 3:39:40 PM PST by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Atheists exist all alone in a limited Newtonian universe...everyone else lives in a Quantum universe of limitless possibility.


22 posted on 02/08/2009 3:40:06 PM PST by Bobalu (McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Romans 1:20 For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

Observe and believe, or not. It's your choice, but you are without excuse.

23 posted on 02/08/2009 3:40:07 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

So you can do all of that in a lab?


24 posted on 02/08/2009 3:45:16 PM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

Have you invented a time machine that allows you to go back and observe and repeat your timeline? I think not.


25 posted on 02/08/2009 3:46:47 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone

You are right. His imagination cannot conceive of the reward he will get for staying faithful to God’s word in the face of rapidly growing materialist hostility.


26 posted on 02/08/2009 3:48:34 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“No scientist has any alternative or better ‘birth certificate’ for the earth or the universe. All scientific estimates of earth and universe age require a whole lot of assumptions. The key assumption is uniformitarianism, which is atheism disguised as science, because it assumes no miraculous interventions in history.4 Christians have no reason to accept, and every reason to reject, atheistic assumptions about the universe. “
Using a written record that was transcribed from oral traditions is a dubious ‘birth certificate’. But that is beside the point. The age of the universe and the earth itself and all life on earth are determined by theories backed up by observable and repeatable evidence. Relying on stories written in colorful prose based off of old stories does not prove or disprove anything, it only puts question on those who rely upon it to deny scientific information put before them.
Denying science is a bigger folly than denying god. Saying gravity doesn’t exist doesn’t mean you won’t fall off the cliff.


27 posted on 02/08/2009 3:48:41 PM PST by Nipplemancer (Abolish the DEA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nipplemancer
Denying science is a bigger folly than denying god.

You'd better watch what you're saying there, pal.

28 posted on 02/08/2009 3:55:35 PM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
==The age of the Universe is +/- 13 billion years.

Is your contention observable and repeatable?

Dude, believe your lying eyes.
Go outside tonight and if the sky is clear look up at the sky with a telescope or pair of binoculars. The light of many distant stars and galaxies take 100's of millions of light years to get here, so by definition, these have to be 100's of millions of years old.
The Hubble telescope can see stars being formed billions of years ago because it can see much farther into space and can see light billions of light years away and which take billions of years to reach its lens.
When we look at distant stars we are seeing them the way they looked when the light left them not as they are right now.

29 posted on 02/08/2009 3:59:41 PM PST by Riodacat (Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nipplemancer

Because science has gotten it right SO many times ... /sarc

The universe is shrinking. No, wait a second, no, no the universe is expanding ... yeah, that’s it.


30 posted on 02/08/2009 4:00:01 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
The Scriptures are quite clearly inspired of God, truthful in history, theology, and prophecy.

And the Bible is likewise clear on matters of life, faith, morality, and devotion to God:

The only REAL question is whether a man or a culture accept the Living Word as authoritative -- revealing the Law of Holy God ---
Likewise promising -- in Christ alone -- the purchase of mercy, and forgiveness for all of man's transgressions against that extraordinary revelation of law--

Finally the provision of daily grace that imparts the Holy Spirit into the hearts of all who accept His terms of life -- enabling us to enjoy the coommunal relationship --

And enjoy the blessed promise of eternal life.

It's really a simple clear choice we all make -- in favor of against -- proactively or by default.

Who is on the Lord's side?

31 posted on 02/08/2009 4:00:02 PM PST by Wings-n-Wind (The main things are the plain things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I like to point out that people today assume that all the people in ancient times were dullards. While many people were, many people today are just as simple. But then and now, it is not the simpletons that make history.

For example, it is now known that the Pentateuch was created as a poem or song. Poetry evolved in preliterate times as a mnemonic device for the accurate retention of information. But illiterate does not mean ignorant or stupid.

For example, some of the most complex philosophical questions ever devised were integrated into the Pentateuch. In his brief conversation between Moses and JHVH, Moses cut to the chase and asked the question whose answer has dominated philosophy ever since.

“I Am that I Am” (Ehyeh asher Ehyeh).

Volumes have been written about the consequences of that single statement. Martin Buber, perhaps the most influential Jewish philosopher of the 20th Century wrote his masterwork “I and Thou” to explain some of the significance of this statement. It is an easy read, and devastatingly hard to fully understand.

When published in 1923, it made a huge splash in the theological community, then was promptly forgotten by the vast majority who just didn’t get it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_and_thou

With that statement, JHVH identifies as a singularity. This means that JHVH can’t have a name, because there is nothing to compare to JHVH. Not with size, shape, color, smell, sound. Anything that can be labeled cannot be JHVH. There cannot be two JHVH.

In turn, according to Kabbalah, this explains the origins of the universe. JHVH wanted to see if there was anything that isn’t JHVH, so JHVH created the universe as a mirror.


32 posted on 02/08/2009 4:01:35 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I don’t claim that science has all the answers, nor do I claim it to always be right. The saving grace of science is the ability and willingness to question orthodoxy, sometimes proving it wrong, others proving it right. Religion leaves no room for admitting error or findings of new evidence. Science and religion are mutually incompatible. Leave the creation of the universe to people way smarter than you or I.


33 posted on 02/08/2009 4:06:42 PM PST by Nipplemancer (Abolish the DEA !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: shekkian
See my post 29 for age of universe. While it doesn`t establish that the universe is 13.5 billion years old, it does prove that it is at least several billion years old - and that is only because our Hubble telescope cannot pick up light farther away than several billion light years.
A better telescope in the future will undoubtedly peer even farther into space - perhaps 10 billion years.
As for the age of earth and life, fossils have been found in rock dating back 3 billion years. This is undisputed. Someone could make a huge name for themselves if they could prove that the thousands of fossils found were either fakes or that the dating methodology is flawed.
34 posted on 02/08/2009 4:08:16 PM PST by Riodacat (Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Amusing debate.

Note how it’s always the God of Christianity they blast when attacking creation.

You never hear of them slamming the Muslim theory, whatever the heck it is.

Try the Native American theories about foxes and eagles and crawling out of the ground creation stories. Attack those why don’t you, weenies.

You know, diversity.


35 posted on 02/08/2009 4:16:09 PM PST by StAntKnee (It's a show about NOTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

“Once you let go of the Bible as history, all Christian doctrine begins to disintegrate.”

If you read the bible as history I think you miss the point. When Jesus fed several thousand people with fish from a basket he wasn’t trying to tell us about himself. It is beside the point whether he actually did it or not, the point of the story is about faith, not about the ability of Jesus to perform miracles.


36 posted on 02/08/2009 4:16:59 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat

Yes, yes, yes. I know all that. My question was can you create your own Big Bang?


37 posted on 02/08/2009 4:18:10 PM PST by shekkian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: yazoo

One point of the miracles is that faith doesn’t come from them. Saving faith is a gift of God.


38 posted on 02/08/2009 4:26:27 PM PST by Phillipian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Riodacat
Two independent teams of scientists have found a way to reduce the speed of light to zero. Although light in a vacuum moves at a neck-breaking 186,000 miles a second, materials with a high refractive index can slow it down.

So if Newton is correct, there must also be a way to speed up light, which would imply that there is something faster than the speed of light. We just haven't discovered it yet. That's the problem with scientific "fact." It's based only on what is known/seen/observed. It leaves no room for what is unknown/not seen/not observed. Science revises its opinion when new observable data becomes available - which is the only intelligent position to take.

That's why faith is so important to Christians. We believe by faith because we know that what is currently unseen will one day provide the answers that unite science and faith. Science and religion are at odds only when those who follow one believe that the other is impossible.

Malachi 3:6 I the Lord do not change.

39 posted on 02/08/2009 4:30:22 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nipplemancer

Ping to #39


40 posted on 02/08/2009 4:31:06 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson