Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Global Television for Our Future Global Leader
Right Side News ^ | February 9, 2009 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 02/09/2009 8:32:32 PM PST by ForGod'sSake

Surprise and even shock were among the reactions to my recent column about how elite members of the World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, were considering a proposal for a new global television network to usher in a state of "global governance." It sounded authoritarian, even totalitarian, to some.

Here are more of the troubling details.

The media proposal, which was included in "The Global Agenda 2009" report, is to create "a new global network" with "the capacity to connect the world, bridging cultures and peoples, and telling us who we are and what we mean to each other." Several prominent U.S. media figures signed on to the alarming and controversial proposal.

Isn't it nice that we might have a TV network telling us "who we are?" And "what we mean to each other?" Perhaps we will learn that we are global citizens. Perhaps a global leader of some sort will tell us that. Who might that be?

This outlandish and frightening proposal doesn't come from a fringe organization. The WEF is an exclusive club of very rich and powerful people from around the world. It describes itself as "an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging leaders in partnerships to shape global, regional and industry agendas."

This year's conference featured speeches by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and Chinese Premier We Jiabao. Many U.S. corporations, including some getting Wall Street bailout money, were sponsors. News Corporation, the parent of Fox News, was a "strategic partner" of the event. 

Valerie Jarrett, Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Relations and Public Liaison, represented the Obama Administration at this year's event and called leaders from all nations to "seize gladly" the duties of collaborating and boldly embrace "a new era of global financial responsibility."

But the WEF also envisions cooperation and collaboration in global media ventures. It asks, "How can we save journalism to help it save the world?" Clearly, this is advocacy journalism on a global scale.

Indeed, the list of "Recommendations" says it is imperative to start "Communicating a global agenda, and motivating and mobilizing people to support it..."

Is this journalism? Or is it brainwashing and propaganda?

It says that "a genuine, global voice" is needed that shares a "fundamental commitment" to being an international media voice, and makes mention of "the media voices we think of as international" coming from London (the BBC), Qatar (Al-Jazeera) or Atlanta (CNN).

BBC is known for its anti-American programming, Al-Jazeera for its pro-terrorist slant, and CNN for its left-wing and pro-Democratic bias.

It will take "innovative public-private funding" to bring this new network into being, apparently meaning that the taxpayers in the U.S. will have to be soaked in order to help bring this about. But no price tag is put on the venture and no objection was apparently raised to government funding of such a network on a global basis. An "overview" statement does, however, decry "censorship and self-censorship." 

Elsewhere in the report (page 31) the idea of "international taxation" is proposed for "global action" of various kinds. Perhaps this is a vehicle for raising revenue for the new "global voice."  

The media proposal was developed by one of several "Global Agenda Councils" under the auspices of the WEF. The new TV network proposal was issued under the supervision of Pat Mitchell, the president of the Paley Center for Media and former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Public Broadcasting Service. She was the chair of the Global Agenda Council on the Future of Media.

Other members of the Council on the Future of Media were Betsy Morgan of the left-wing Huffington Post (former general manager of; Rui Chenggang of China Central Television, an official political propaganda arm of the communist regime; and Zafar Siddiqi of CNBC Arabiya, a subsidiary of General Electric which is described as a 24-hour Arabic language financial and business information channel.

There is no indication in the published report that the Huffington Post executive raised any objection to working hand-in-glove with the communist propaganda channel. Is the Chinese media model a precedent for the new "global network?"

The conference was covered by media organizations such as CNBC, CNN, Bloomberg, Forbes and Fox, but no coverage that we could find was devoted to the proposal for a government-financed global media network. Talk about self-censorship!

John J. DeGioia, President of Georgetown University and the "Rapporteur of the Global Agenda Councils focusing on Society and Values," summarized the work of Mitchell's panel. He says (page 46) that, "We believe that this new moment also calls for a new media platform, across all media channels, a global non-profit ‘CNN' providing a new form of independent journalism to inform, illuminate and deepen knowledge about issues that improve the state of the world."

According to DeGioia's biography, he walks the walk and is dedicated to helping "prepare young people for leadership roles in the global community." His bio adds, "He is a member of the U.S. National Commission for UNESCO and Chair of its Education Committee and he represents Georgetown at the World Economic Forum and on the Council on Foreign Relations."

The media council took advantage of what a description of its work said was an "enormous opportunity" to "redefine the media and its roles in a global, interconnected society."

Under the title of "Recommendations" (page 182), the Council on the Future of Media declares that "The Council is championing a new global, independent news and information service whose role is to inform, educate and improve the state of the world-one that would take advantage of all platforms of content delivery from mobile to satellite and online to create a new global network."

It goes on, "In a world where there are calls for global governance as a response to a global financial crisis, where scientific research, capital flows and production chains are globalized, the media and the communities in which we imagine ourselves remain fiercely localized." Hence, a global network will work against "localized" or national-based systems and convince people to go "global" with their outlook and solutions. In other words, the new network will help undermine old-fashioned notions of national sovereignty and patriotism.

There are 22 members (page 183) of the Council on the Future of Media. In addition to Mitchell and Morgan, American members include:

There doesn't appear to be one identifiable conservative member on the list. Of course, this is probably the way it was designed. 

            Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of Accuracy in Media, and can be contacted at cliff.kincaid@aim.orgThis e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it .

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; alexjones; aljazeera; americans; authoritarian; barackobama; bbc; borders; brainwashing; business; carnegiecorporation; centeronuschina; china; chinese; cnn; columbiauniversity; commission; communism; communists; corporations; corruption; cultures; davidnordfors; davos; democrats; fox; fraud; freedom; global; globalgovernance; glowbull; government; harvarduniversity; influence; international; johnlavine; journalism; kumbaya; liberty; media; medill; money; nations; news; nicholaslemann; northwestern; obama; of; oneworld; oneworldorder; orvillehschell; pennsylvania; people; politics; power; propaganda; relations; secret; susanking; switzerland; television; totalitarian; trilateral; tv; un; unitednations; unitedstates; university; valeriejarrett; wallstreet; wef; worldeconomicforum
Ran across this item while looking for something entirely different. Timley...
1 posted on 02/09/2009 8:32:32 PM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Heh, Timely...

2 posted on 02/09/2009 8:35:10 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its shoes on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

What will those wacky libs think up next? (I’m only laughing on the outside).

3 posted on 02/09/2009 8:36:18 PM PST by eclecticEel (Wall Street isn't a charity ... so why are we giving them money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Several prominent U.S. media figures

Names of the traitors.
4 posted on 02/09/2009 8:46:55 PM PST by randomhero97 ("First you want to kill me, now you want to kiss me. Blow!" - Ash)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Remember that movie in the future of people having to race home to hear the Dear Leader on their big screen tvs?

5 posted on 02/09/2009 8:51:19 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

Maybe a little more to that analog to digital change than we thought, eh?

ETA: Not the type to wear a tinfoil hat, either.

6 posted on 02/09/2009 8:51:43 PM PST by kozanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kozanne

When you equalize all nations, the wealthier ones become poorer as the poorer ones become wealthier. These people mean to take away what America has built for herself instead of building their own.

7 posted on 02/09/2009 9:26:31 PM PST by johnnycap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: randomhero97
Names of the traitors.

News Corporation, the parent of Fox News, was a "strategic partner" of the event.

Keeping their enemies close, or part of the cabal?

8 posted on 02/09/2009 9:37:39 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its shoes on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
Keeping their enemies close, or part of the cabal?

Best in it's class for herding right wingers off the enslavement cliff.

9 posted on 02/09/2009 10:35:26 PM PST by Earthdweller (Socialism makes you feel better about oppressing people.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller
Best in it's class for herding right wingers off the enslavement cliff.

I suppose the good news is, we get to watch a circus more to our liking.

10 posted on 02/09/2009 10:39:21 PM PST by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth can get its shoes on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson