Posted on 02/13/2009 8:02:50 AM PST by dascallie
'Sanctions' sought in eligibility case
President's attorneys file motion demanding birth, college records be withheld from public
February 13, 2009
By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily
A high-powered team of Los Angeles attorneys representing President Obama in his effort to keep his birth certificate, college records and passport documents concealed from the public has suggested there should be "monetary sanctions" against a lawyer whose clients have brought a complaint alleging Obama doesn't qualify for the Oval Office under the Constitution's demand for a "natural born" citizen in that post.
The suggestion came in an exchange of e-mails and documents in a case brought by former presidential candidate Alan Keyes and others in California. The case originally sought to have the state's electors ordered to withhold their votes for Obama until his eligibility was established.
Since Obama's inauguration, it has been amended to seek a future requirement for a vetting process, in addition to the still-sought unveiling of his records.
In the case, handled largely by Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation, records were subpoenaed documenting Obama's attendance at Occidental College.
The lawyer for the college, Stuart W. Rudnick of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, urgently contacted Fredric D. Woocher of Strumwasser & Woocher.
"This firm is counsel to Occidental College. The College is in receipt of the enclosed subpoena that seeks certain information concerning President-Elect Barack Obama," he wrote via fax. "Inasmuch as the subpoena appears to be valid on its face, the College will have no alternative but to comply with the subpoena absent a court order instructing otherwise."
Within hours, Woocher contacted Kreep regarding the issue, telling him, "It will likely not surprise you to hear that President-elect Obama opposes the production of the requested records.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Ya know, this could come down to tossing lead. I’m just saying...
“President’s attorneys file motion demanding birth, college records be withheld from public”
This is about the strangest request made by any public figure. You think he has something to hide? OK you Congressmen, if you love your country and have any courage, pounce on it.
How dare anyone demand that Hussein prove he is constitutionally qualified to be the president! Fine the ba$tard$!
ping
The “tossing lead” days will come when Hussein decides to overturn the 2nd amendment. At least that had better be the case, or we can kiss the US and the rest of our freedom goodbye.
Why would it not surprise him? It should be surprising!
I couldn’t believe my ears a few minutes ago, when I heard a Texas radio host (who has avoided this topic like the plague until this morning) was talking about and reading something about this issue. Then after a big sigh, he said “what have we elected”.
This is an example of why I believe these cases won't go anywhere until Congress passes a law requiring candidates to submit proof during the election. Now Obama's lawyers are saying that no one has a legal requirement to check his paperwork.
See my post at #9. They’re no longer asking “How dare you?” Now they’re saying, “It’s not your job. In fact, it’s nobody’s job. So back off or we’ll recover our expenses.”
Len Wooley?
Yes. I haven't ever heard him address this issue, has he and I missed it?
Maybe not explicitly legally (no explicit law), but from Constitutional requirement and that Congress demanded to see McCain's, I'd say there is pretty good precedence.
Congress didn’t demand to see McCain’s. McCain volunteered his paperwork.
What did he elect!? I am not stupid enough to have voted for this obvious marxist fraud. I voted for the other obvious marxist fraud. This country and its ignorant populace are in for one Hell of a rude awakening. Maybe they will be smarter next time, provided that there is a next time.
This is harassment of the first order. Isn’t there a way to file an order against the group of the current President’s lawyers to cease and desist the harassment?
We WILL eventually obtain the true information. And when we do, All That Money that was given away by Congress will have to be returned because the current President could not legally sign any legislation into law.
ping
I just thought of something . . . if we advertise the fact that when (not if) it is proved that the current President does not meet the Natural Born Citizen clause, all the banks and corporations and businesses who have benefited from any bills this current President has signed into legislation will have received illegal funds and will be mandated to repay it at some point in time, right?
If the current President is removed from office and Biden lives to take the office or is removed by Pelosi so she can become a Queen, the bills would have to be signed a second time. The problem with that is, if Pelosi is President, she would have conflict of interest on any bill she voted for that she ‘re-signs’ into legislation . . . but even so, she could not pre-date the legislation to the original date the current President signed it. So monies spent from the initial reception to the date either Biden or Pelosi “re-signed” it would have to be returned, right?
I’m sounding like a lawyer, I need to go wash my mouth out with soap.
From my understanding anything he signs as President will be illegal if he is found not to be Constitutionally qualified? At first I thought this couldn’t be true but why is he fighting so hard to keep it private when it could be put to rest in minutues with sinple copies?
I’m SURE George W. Bush or John McCain could have gotten away with this, aren’t you? /s
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.