Skip to comments.
Chuck Todd: The White House Bubble (MSM waking up?)
MSNBC ^
| February 13, 2009
| Chuck Todd
Posted on 02/13/2009 3:11:58 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: skeeter
The MSM cant expose BO. They expose BO, they expose themselves Very, very true.
If it gets out that O-Liar said, for example he would take public funds for his campaign but ended up with $750 M instead the public will say to the MSM, "Didn't you know?" (of couse they did) and "Why didn't you tell us."
The MSM doesn't like the Liar, but if they expose him too much they risk a Repub juggernaut with a possible Palin in a leadership role and they don't want that.
To: KansasGirl
and the 911 families
Rush told a story today about an Aunt of one of the 9/11 victims that was invited to attend the briefing about closing Gitmo....she happen to be “in favor” of closing it because of torture.....meanwhile the man's two brothers were not invited...they just happen to want Gitmo to remain open and the prosecutions to move forward. The Aunt according to Rush was a distant relative...
There is absolutely no end to what this group will do to use others to achieve their results
22
posted on
02/13/2009 3:27:02 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Chuck Todd is on his knees for Obama, now he’s pouting because Obama forced him to swallow.
23
posted on
02/13/2009 3:27:03 PM PST
by
FTJM
To: 2ndDivisionVet
*** UPDATE, RESPONSE TO COMMENTORS: "This isn't about us not having access, this is about ANYONE having access... if it's NOT us, it's the public!...Beat us up all you want, but this isn't about us whining, it's about us not even being able to do the job you want us to do and that is be the people's questioner here. But, of course, having a respectable debate on this issue with some is impossible. The irony, of course, is that many of you would be just as upset about the lack of access as I am if the occupant of the White House were someone else. Are you (the writer) fricken kidding me? What unmitigated bull stuff! This guy thinks I'm upset because he won't get access to ask the questions I wish he could? No, I'm angry that he wouldn't ask the quetions I would like to see asked, if he did get access.
He and his buds in the press corp can cry crocodile tears until hell freezes over for all I care.
Obama's staff is too stupid to know that these folks would grovel at their feet to have access. They aren't going to out themselves for backing him in the first place.
24
posted on
02/13/2009 3:28:39 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Resolved: McCain 2010, Gregg 2010, Snowe 2010, Spectre 2012, Collins 2014)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
You can leave a comment at the article. Mine won’t be published.
25
posted on
02/13/2009 3:29:26 PM PST
by
dynachrome
(Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But...but...this can’t be... (Cue gay man crying)
To: MGMSwordsman
You’re correct. I say that the media is a wing of the rat (marxist) party. There is no liberal party anymore such as it is historically defined in American politics. There is a marxist party.
27
posted on
02/13/2009 3:30:35 PM PST
by
mrsmel
(Put the Gitmo terrorists near Capitol Hill.)
To: MGMSwordsman
"First of all, the phrase finally waking up"Chuck Fraudd is making excuses for his failure to report on the meeting.
yitbos
28
posted on
02/13/2009 3:34:51 PM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds.")
To: anniegetyourgun
Actually, in the days since these scribes saw Helen Thomas, the Huffington Post, and that blowhard Ed Schultz in the front row at the Obama presser, I’ve detected a change in their formerly-fawning attitude.
29
posted on
02/13/2009 3:41:29 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(Internet Powerhouse)
To: JennysCool
“Ive detected a change in their formerly-fawning attitude.”
Too late, you obama leg humpers. The messiah will just not invite you next time. Michael Moore-on in the front row, next?
30
posted on
02/13/2009 3:46:57 PM PST
by
dynachrome
(Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Cry me a river, chuckster, eh?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Chuck has been in the tank for Obozo from the get go.
Looks like brown ring on Chuck’s nose might be wearing off.
32
posted on
02/13/2009 3:51:02 PM PST
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin - Jindal 2012)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Message control is something every White House wants but sometimes when a White House attempts to control a message too much, they can irritate the press to the point that we all stop even paying attention to their message of the day. Just ask the previous occupant. I call bull=h^t Chuck!
33
posted on
02/13/2009 3:51:52 PM PST
by
rocksblues
(Sarah and Joe, Real Americans!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
OK, so this person is part of the White house Press corps, but nothing prevents him from tracking some of these people down and interviewing them on his own time, which any enterprising journalist would think of doing, but clearly he isn't one. He has his cushy job at the White House and if the victims don't come to him for interrogation then he certainly isn't going to go chasing them.
Stagecraft and management of the press will certainly be hallmarks of the Obama regime. They know it, and mild complaints of this type are just for form.
Republicans should take careful note of how it's done in the unlikely event that we ever have a Republican president again.
To: MGMSwordsman
They are one of the organs of our destruction and are a fundamental part of the enemy within. Ab-so-tively. But, for the life of me, I can't figure what's in it for them. Will they become our Pravda and be alloted dachas along the shores of Lake Tahoe and other scenic resorts where they can sip their vodka and pound down caviar?
Every media enterprise must 'sell' advertising to someone. I suppose if they create a monopoly, advertisers will have no one else to buy advertising from except them? Is that it?
Baghdad Bob could probably sell a few used cars, but I'd rather spend my money on the Sham-Wow guy.
35
posted on
02/13/2009 3:54:27 PM PST
by
budwiesest
(We're getting low on bread, can we get some more circus?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Show your displeasure, Chuck. Throw a shoe...
36
posted on
02/13/2009 3:56:41 PM PST
by
OrangeHoof
(YES WE CAN have a Depression.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Chuck Todd and these press people are like puppies. Love their master, but beg for crumbs, hoping that the master will pay attention to them, turn them over and rub their belly.
37
posted on
02/13/2009 4:02:43 PM PST
by
loreldan
(Santorum, where are you?)
To: anniegetyourgun
I’m not interested in some butt kisser like Todd.
I want the journalist who has a line on bambis stool, sex life and a line on his bank accounts.
38
posted on
02/13/2009 4:02:57 PM PST
by
Joe Boucher
(An enemy of Islam)
To: relictele
When your candidate lip-syncs his way through 2 years of a campaign theyre certainly not going to start revealing the recording process.I always liked the epithet that claimed that Obama was "The Milli Vanilli of politics."
39
posted on
02/13/2009 4:13:32 PM PST
by
Oatka
("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
To: JennysCool
But then, you do have those rose-colored glasses on! ; )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson