Extinct Ibex Clone Dies at Birth

ICR ^ | February 14, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

[bert]

I do not object to the science part of the article. My objection is cluttering it up with nonsense about divine design.

[CottShop]

[[I do not object to the science part of the article. My objection is cluttering it up with nonsense about divine design.]]

As opposed to macroevolutionists clutterign hteir science with ‘nature did it.... but we don’t know how”?

Just concnetrate on the science- scientists on both sides of hte isle are allowed their opinion

[CottShop]

thearticles make clear which 2%- knock yourself out reading them- As I said- I’m done with your assinine questions and insulting tone- You’ve proven you aren’t serious about any of the science presented and are only looking for any way you can find to insult Creationists and ID folks with petty accusaitons and comments- Have a nice day

[CottShop]

[[I do not object to the science part of the article. My objection is cluttering it up with nonsense about divine design.]]

And just for hte record- I too wish BOTH sides could just stick to the objective facts of science, as the evidences stand on their own merrits and present a ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ case for ID- but that’s never goign to happen- so we have to read subjective and objective together and simply strain through the rest. However, I do not begrudge a Christian site for teachign Christian messages, nor do I begrudge Macroevolutionists for opining on abotu hteir beleifs either.