Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shelby discusses stimulus bill, other issues (Questions Obama's Citizenship* (Uh-Oh))
The Cullman Times ^ | February 21, 2009 | Patrick McCreless

Posted on 02/22/2009 12:25:31 PM PST by Cyropaedia

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last
To: erkyl

Sure sounds like it!


81 posted on 02/23/2009 12:11:54 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (What happened to my IRAs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Chief Engineer; Polarik; LucyT
Fact Check is part of the Democrat machine.

Chief Engineer deserves the credit on this one:

Here's the "qualifications" on Joe Miller and Jess Henig of FactCheck. It's on the FactCheck “About Us” page (http://www.factcheck.org/about/ ):

Joe Miller
Staff Writer, Annenberg Political Fact Check

Joe Miller earned his B.A. in philosophy from Hampden-Sydney College, his M.A. in philosophy from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in political philosophy from the University of Virginia. He joined the Annenberg Public Policy Center in April 2007 after working as a writer with the Mack/Crounse Group. Previously he was an assistant professor of philosophy at the United States Military Academy and at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke and a visiting fellow at the Callaghan Centre for Conflict Studies at the University of Wales at Swansea

and

Jessica Henig
Staff Writer, Annenberg Political Fact Check

Jessica Henig earned her B.A. in history of science from Smith College and her M.A. in English from the University of Maryland. While at Maryland, she taught digital literature and rhetorical writing. Prior to joining the Annenberg Public Policy Center in May 2007, she worked for the National Academies Press. She has also worked for the National Institutes of Health and as a freelance researcher and editor.

Note there's NO qualifications for either of them in document examination, document forensics or any field remotely similar, and yet the word of these two has been taken as absolute fact!


82 posted on 02/23/2009 12:23:23 PM PST by BP2 (I think, therefore I'm a conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

When both parents are U.S. citizens, and one is active duty personnel, and the spouse is a military dependent, then the UCMJ considers their child to be a natural born citizen regardless of where the birth takes place. So, McCain has some kind of leg to stand on.


83 posted on 02/23/2009 12:53:09 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
When both parents are U.S. citizens, and one is active duty personnel, and the spouse is a military dependent, then the UCMJ considers their child to be a natural born citizen regardless of where the birth takes place. So, McCain has some kind of leg to stand on.

But not according to Donofrio.

84 posted on 02/23/2009 12:55:52 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Then, I guess, Donofrio's wrong on that particular point.

Look, if the Supreme wants to declare someone in McCain's situation ineligible, I'm OK with that. I would rather have them err on the side of prudence, than to create a new loophole.

85 posted on 02/23/2009 1:02:54 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
Then, I guess, Donofrio's wrong on that particular point.

Which begs the question then what other points is Donofrio wrong on? His whole arguement is that he concedes Obama was born in Hawaii but claims he is still ineligible because a natural born citizen is one born in the U.S. of two U.S. citizen parents. That doesn't leave any wiggle room for McCain.

86 posted on 02/23/2009 1:08:04 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Again, McCain could argue the case from the standpoint of the UCMJ.


87 posted on 02/23/2009 1:12:24 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
When both parents are U.S. citizens, and one is active duty personnel, and the spouse is a military dependent, then the UCMJ considers their child to be a natural born citizen regardless of where the birth takes place.

How does the UCMJ manage to trump the Constitution?


88 posted on 02/23/2009 1:24:22 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
Here's the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ):

Uniform Code of Military Justice

I see nothing in it regarding citizenship.


89 posted on 02/23/2009 1:31:38 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

Because the military operates under its own official jurisdiction via the UCMJ. Military personnel do not have the same rights as civilians. But it works both ways with regards to exemptions.


90 posted on 02/23/2009 1:35:03 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

There’s really no need to argue anything. Based on U.S. law and Supreme Court precedent McCain is a natural born U.S. citizen. And if Obama was born in Hawaii then so is he.


91 posted on 02/23/2009 1:40:45 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
And here's 8 USC 1403 which covers those born in the Canal Zone or the Republic of Panama on or after 1904:

§ 1403. Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904

(a) Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.

(b) Any person born in the Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States employed by the Government of the United States or by the Panama Railroad Company, or its successor in title, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.


Doesn't say anything about "natural born." Just says they're a citizen of the United States. A person who is naturalized is also a "citizen of the United States."


92 posted on 02/23/2009 1:41:35 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

Well, was McCain a citizen at birth, or wasn’t he...? You’ve repeatedly stated that there were only two ways to become a citizen : by birth or by naturalization.


93 posted on 02/23/2009 1:46:22 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
Because the military operates under its own official jurisdiction via the UCMJ.

I'm sorry, but the military operates under the Constitution of the United States. As does Congress. And the UCMJ is an act of Congress. And Congress cannot amend the Constitution by way of simple legislation.

Try again.


94 posted on 02/23/2009 1:47:41 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

Get off it. You don’t have the same rights in the military as you do in the civilian world. You operate under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ. Any soldier that tried to argue to his superiors about his “rights” under the Constitution would be assigned to KP.


95 posted on 02/23/2009 1:51:39 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia; BP2; Calpernia; Red Steel; ckilmer; STARWISE; SunkenCiv; LucyT; potlatch; Kevmo; ...
Notice that this “staff writer” took it upon himself to rebut Shelby's remark about the lack of birth certificate with the Obama camp's usual, obfuscating talking points: AP said this, FactCheck.org said that, Hawaii state officials did that. Did the ‘Rats send him a little gift for that insertion into the article?
96 posted on 02/23/2009 1:55:56 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia
Well, was McCain a citizen at birth, or wasn’t he...?

He became a US citizen by way of legislation passed after his birth. But it only made him a citizen by way if collective naturalization. To be a natural born citizen, you have to be born in the United States or its territories. And the Canal Zone was neither at the time of McCain's birth. Which is why 8 USC 1403 was passed, in 1937. To collectively naturalize those born in the Canal Zone to US citizens.


97 posted on 02/23/2009 1:58:47 PM PST by Michael Michael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia; All

If Shelby had those same doubts back in January, he could have raised an objection to Obama at the counting of the electoral votes in January before a joint session of Congress.


98 posted on 02/23/2009 1:58:53 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Michael

Constitutional scholars on the Right and Left agree that he was born a U.S. citizen. Both Ted Olson (former Solicitor General) and Harvard’s Lawrence Tribe have studied the case and agree at the very least that he is a citizen by birth.


99 posted on 02/23/2009 2:07:13 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; BP2

Maybe he just recently became aware of the loopholes in Hawaii’s laws and possible problems with the CoLB in the pictures.


100 posted on 02/23/2009 2:08:58 PM PST by Cyropaedia ("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson