Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Westbrook
Yes, of course. Creationists must be tragically ignorant, simply uneducated, or just plain stupid if we don’t ascribe to your materialistic story of origins.

Evolutionists have nothing if they don’t have condescending invective.

Just like your pet theory, your narrative against your intellectual opponents has no basis in fact.

Many Creationists are college educated. Many Creationists hold advanced degrees. Many Creationists are successful in business, science, and engineering.

They are not the buck-toothed, google-eyed, mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, drooling caricature you so much like to convey.

Science is inherently materialistic. That's why Crevos are so funny(and laughably ignorant) they keep trying to bang a big square peg(monotheism) into a little round hole(natural science or "materialism" as you like to call it).

It's inherently paradoxical for a true scientist to be a creationist. Science *necessitates* materialism. Anybody that has actually studied reasoning should know that.

So *yes* Crevos are "tragically ignorant, simply uneducated or just plain stupid" as you so aptly put it.

46 posted on 02/23/2009 3:18:13 AM PST by ketsu (It’s not a campaign. It’s a taxpayer-funded farewell tour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: ketsu

> Science *necessitates* materialism.

That was not the opinion of Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Washington, and many, many others whose accomplishments dwarf those of Darwin.


56 posted on 02/23/2009 3:27:29 AM PST by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: ketsu
It's inherently paradoxical for a true scientist to be a creationist.

I think you mean "young earth" creationists. God could have created the universe through the Big Bang and man through evolution. That's not inconsistent with Genesis, unless you take the literal "day" thing seriously.

98 posted on 02/23/2009 7:58:42 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: ketsu; Westbrook; GodGunsGuts; tpanther; YHAOS; Fichori; valkyry1; Mr. Silverback; ...
It's inherently paradoxical for a true scientist to be a creationist. Science *necessitates* materialism. Anybody that has actually studied reasoning should know that.

So much for the the Bible and evolution being compatible fairy tale that the evos like to foist off an everyone.

106 posted on 02/23/2009 8:11:40 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: ketsu; metmom
Science is inherently materialistic

Ah, you are back. You said "*everything* in science is false", with emphasis on "everything". According to you then, evolution is false, among other things.

449 posted on 02/24/2009 2:35:30 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson