Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clayton Cramer: Obama told Idahoans he wouldn't take away their guns. He lied.
Idaho Statesman ^ | 2/23/09 | Clayton Cramer

Posted on 02/23/2009 12:13:37 PM PST by pissant

Remember back in February 2008 when President Obama came to Boise and spoke at a big rally? He made a big point of saying, "I won't take away your guns," because those nasty, dishonest Republicans were saying that Obama was going to do that.

It sure didn't take long for Obama to reveal his intentions. The afternoon of the inauguration, the White House Web site's Urban Policy page admitted that he is indeed going to try and do exactly that. "Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent."

I will give Obama the benefit of the doubt about whether closing the "gun show loophole" violates the Second Amendment. (There really isn't any "gun show loophole" - gun dealers have to do the same paperwork at a gun show as they do at their shop; this is really the private party sale loophole.). There are ways to fix this that aren't necessarily a violation of our rights.

(Excerpt) Read more at idahostatesman.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 111th; banglist; bho2009; democratcongress; democrats; guns; larrysinclairslover; marxistquisling; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
It's coming.
1 posted on 02/23/2009 12:13:37 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
It's coming.

The Revolution, you mean?

Maybe.

2 posted on 02/23/2009 12:16:35 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Oh, it’s here.


3 posted on 02/23/2009 12:17:25 PM PST by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I will give Obama the benefit of the doubt

..first mistake

4 posted on 02/23/2009 12:18:10 PM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
We know he's a pathological liar. That's no surprise. The Democrats in Boise are a minority of the state's residents. Obama didn't carry the state.
5 posted on 02/23/2009 12:18:11 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Ammo will soon be the new currency.


6 posted on 02/23/2009 12:20:49 PM PST by kennyboy509 (Ha! I kill me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I am especially angry at those who say they are evangelicals or gun owners, or other self-professed “conservatives,” who voted for Obama. I expected the left to fall for his nonsense but not people with conservative principles.
7 posted on 02/23/2009 12:23:20 PM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennyboy509
Ammo will soon be the new currency.

If it gets to be that bad, the last thing I'm going to do is trade it away.

8 posted on 02/23/2009 12:24:42 PM PST by AngryJawa (Obama's Success is America's Failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kennyboy509

Ammo is what they’ll be coming after. No, we won’t take away your guns....we’ll just make your bullets and shells so expensive that you won’t be able to LOAD them.


9 posted on 02/23/2009 12:27:03 PM PST by Right Cal Gal (Abraham Lincoln would have let Berkeley leave the Union without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
"If it gets to be that bad, the last thing I'm going to do is trade it away. "

If it's a currency, you wonn't have to trade it away, you can just spend it.

Why do they call it a "shot glass"?

10 posted on 02/23/2009 12:27:04 PM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

“Keeping guns out of the hands of criminals...”

Just have to rant a bit about one of these “genius” gun laws of theirs.

You know, if a person gets drunk, drives and they kill someone, they get their voting rights and their gun rights taken away. They can still drive a car, and they can still buy booze and go in bars....this doesn’t make sense to me. Why not take away the weapon they used to kill someone; the booze and the car?


11 posted on 02/23/2009 12:27:49 PM PST by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal

Oh, you are smart!


12 posted on 02/23/2009 12:28:50 PM PST by tuckrdout (~ 'Daily example is the most subtle of poisons.' ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Go, Clayton, go! He’s the most articulate pro-2nd Amendment person we have out there right now.


13 posted on 02/23/2009 12:29:56 PM PST by ssaftler (Barack Obama-lini: First "American Idol" elected President of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

We need to answer the lie “gun show loophole” wherever we see it.

What they want to do is ban the private sale of property from one individual to another. That’s what it comes down to.


14 posted on 02/23/2009 12:33:14 PM PST by MrB (The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
...the last thing I'm going to do is trade it away.

You will be forced to give it away. (at about 2,200 fps.)

15 posted on 02/23/2009 12:34:24 PM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tuckrdout

Well, I’ll advocate once again that when you get a driver’s license, the state should do the background check and stamp on your driver’s license, “This individual is NOT authorized to purchase a firearm,” if the person is not legally authorized to buy one. Problem solved; long waits in gunshops over, no one buying weapons at gunshows, and so on and so forth.


16 posted on 02/23/2009 12:35:17 PM PST by Hootowl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I can't read this crap anymore. It is freaking me out on a daily basis.

It just gets worse every damned day.

17 posted on 02/23/2009 12:41:41 PM PST by teenyelliott (Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kennyboy509

Semper Fi!

Be Ever Vigilant!

Molon Labe!


18 posted on 02/23/2009 12:47:28 PM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal

Buy now stock up with whatever you can find.

Even if its a caliber you don’t have.

Don’t forget some beans and rice.


19 posted on 02/23/2009 12:47:44 PM PST by kennyboy509 (Ha! I kill me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl
I’ll advocate once again that when you get a driver’s license, the state should do the background check and stamp on your driver’s license, “This individual is NOT authorized to purchase a firearm,” if the person is not legally authorized to buy one.

An interesting idea, one I've not heard before. Are you not afraid it would make gun rights extinct within a few years? Sounds to me like the easiest way to disarm America.

20 posted on 02/23/2009 12:52:33 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (American Revolution II -- overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson