Skip to comments.
Coal in Your Car’s Tank
the new american ^
| 06.09.09
| Ed Hiserodt
Posted on 02/23/2009 8:18:10 PM PST by Coleus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Coleus
Great links!
Bankrupt coal, bankrupt the US
21
posted on
02/23/2009 9:59:52 PM PST
by
Syncro
(Ti Ming -- Use Librally)
To: Petronski
Leftists will smear this as a right wing plan to bring radioactive Nazi gasoline to American pumps.What a plan! I've been waiting all of my life for this and so has my truck. It takes me back to the sixth grade when we put Maltese crosses on the sissy bars of our Stingrays. Bring on the radioactive Nazi gasoline!!!
22
posted on
02/23/2009 11:03:32 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
To: Syncro
The communistic enviromentals want artificial scargity in order to justify controlling people.
23
posted on
02/23/2009 11:05:24 PM PST
by
hoosierham
(Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
To: Coleus; All
24
posted on
02/24/2009 1:44:46 AM PST
by
backhoe
(All across America, the Lights are going out...)
To: org.whodat
Sasol has patented some process but does not control the only coal-to-liquid processes in use. Sasol in Africa is probably the biggest commercial operation.
Germany also did this during WWII to suplement fuel supply.
25
posted on
02/24/2009 5:08:00 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: Coleus
pro-energy bump.
double pro-nuclear bump.
To: Iris7; All
This stuff is utterly mundane, no pie in the sky thing, and ready to go right now.
I'm in 100% agreement with your post.
Yes I know these things and so do you and a few others but what about the idiots in Washington, D.C. ?
27
posted on
02/24/2009 8:40:54 AM PST
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: hinckley buzzard
He’s for the green diseconomy.
To: thackney
Your opinion would be much appreciated by all.
To: Mr. Lucky
Proved process both technologically and economically.
Not as cheap certainly as traditional oil fields but I doubt fuel prices will stay low enough to completely rule out coal-to-liquids.
Politics and Regulations are the biggest factor for use in the US, in my opinion.
30
posted on
02/24/2009 9:23:31 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: thackney
Are btu content and octane ratings comparable to gasoline (or that even better fuel, ethanol)?
To: Mr. Lucky
My understanding is that it produces essentially the same fuel, not a comparable fuel. Octane and Cetane and other fuel components are produced by a different process in the Coal-to-Liquid but the end results are still gasoline and diesel blending components.
Octane produce by distillation, a catalytic cracker, a coker or a coal-to-liquids unit is still Octane.
Just as we have added new units to modern refineries process to create more lighter stock like gasoline (when compared to simple distillation), coal-to-liquids is another process creating the same products.
32
posted on
02/24/2009 10:04:05 AM PST
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: conservative cat
Hitler was a better leader than Obambi (minus the racial hygiene and invading other countries, of course.)
"He certainly was, Ollie"
Esp. energy policy, but now we can just lease patent rights from Sasol and get going easy.
I esp. like their little units that make gasoline right at the well in the mountains where so many little natural gas pockets go unused.
33
posted on
02/24/2009 12:29:51 PM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson