Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Plan for Budget Would Shift Burden to Rich
NY Times ^ | February 25, 2009 | By JACKIE CALMES

Posted on 02/25/2009 2:57:21 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

WASHINGTON – President Obama will propose further tax increases on the affluent to help pay for his promise to make health care more accessible and affordable, administration officials said on Wednesday. [snip]

Mr. Obama will also propose in the budget outline he releases on Thursday to use revenues from the centerpiece of his environmental policy — a plan under which companies will have to purchase permits to exceed pollution emission caps — to pay for an extension of a two-year tax credit that benefits low and middle-income people.

The combined effect of the two proposals, on top of Mr. Obama’s existing plan to roll back the Bush-era income tax reductions on upper-income households, would be a pronounced move to redistribute wealth and reimpose a substantially larger share of the tax burden on the most affluent taxpayers.

Administration officials said the president would seek in the budget he releases on Thursday to cap itemized tax deductions for high-income people, such as couples earning more than about $250,000 a year.

The officials said the resulting revenues would account for about half of a $634 billion “reserve fund” that Mr. Obama will set aside in his budget to begin addressing health care. The other half would come from Medicare savings, including an end to billions of dollars in subsidies to insurance companies under the Medicare Advantage program, and other possible tax-law changes.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amerika; bho44; bhobudget; classwarfare; communism; marxism; obamarx; redistribution; serfdom; socialism; spreadthewealth; taxincrease; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Redistribution of wealth/income on steroids.
1 posted on 02/25/2009 2:57:22 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Start shrugging.


2 posted on 02/25/2009 2:57:59 PM PST by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

High income earners are not “the rich”. We need to abolish the tax code and the IRS and tax spending in order to tax the cash economy, criminals, and the really rich.


3 posted on 02/25/2009 2:58:58 PM PST by austingirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

What happens when there are no more rich people?


4 posted on 02/25/2009 2:59:26 PM PST by Continental Soldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I’m just screwed. Time to retire.


5 posted on 02/25/2009 2:59:36 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Obama’s Plan for Budget Would Shift Burden to Rich"

Who else to rob?

6 posted on 02/25/2009 3:00:49 PM PST by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Don’t worry...the rich have always found ways around burdensome tax policies. They will continue to do so (and I suspect the Obamas will be at the head of the charge). All this will prove to do is reduce revenues to the Treasury, because the vast majority of workers will stay under that $250,000 mark to avoid the bump in tax.

IOW, it won’t work.


7 posted on 02/25/2009 3:01:09 PM PST by erkyl (The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If you outlaw the rich, only outlaws will be rich!


8 posted on 02/25/2009 3:02:50 PM PST by rfp1234 (Phodopus campbelli: household ruler since July 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Hmmm... Let’s say I’m rich... The government is going to tax me up to 90% (Might as well listen to Biden - stupid but loves taxes). Just what should I do...hmmm..

Moving, or just moving money, or quit working, or quit hiring, so many choices... I just may wait until next month to make my decision.


9 posted on 02/25/2009 3:03:14 PM PST by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Sorry, 0’s plan will not touch the Kennedy’s, Kerry, Goldman Sachs execs, etc., and likewise old money tucked away in trusts and offshore accounts.


10 posted on 02/25/2009 3:03:48 PM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

So, umm, who is it that shoulders the majority me the budget now? The poor? Nope. But Obama is bringing change. Today’s change is that rich is now defined as a couple earning 250k. The next change will be even lower.


11 posted on 02/25/2009 3:05:03 PM PST by kingu (Party for rent - conservative opinions not required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Shift?

SHIFT???

The structure of the US tax code has been SHIFTED against the "rich" for a very long time. Generations of Americans have grown up believing that progressive taxation is the way it should be.

Just imagine what the US would be like if wealth and achievement weren't punished!

12 posted on 02/25/2009 3:05:18 PM PST by TChris (So many useful idiots...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Shift?

You can’t “Shift” the burden to the wealthy when the non-wealthy pay nothing or get net checks already.


13 posted on 02/25/2009 3:05:35 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you are talking about Zimbabwe money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
The burden was shifted to the rich most proficient wealth creators a long time ago.
14 posted on 02/25/2009 3:05:46 PM PST by Hoodat (For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

what a dumb headline. the poor pay nothing, much of the middle pays nothing in income taxes


15 posted on 02/25/2009 3:05:55 PM PST by GeronL (Hey, won't you be my Face Book friend??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Income couples making $250,000.00 this means if you are single and make $125,000.00 your taxes will go up as well


16 posted on 02/25/2009 3:06:06 PM PST by bzybee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Can someone explain to me how ANY progressive income tax is not un-fair discrimination/violation of the 14th Amendment, whereas different income earners are not "treated equally"?

True; we've had a progressive tax code for decades, but it's now runaway open season on success. There is NO WAY earning more should equate to higher tax bites (percentage-wise) and be "equal treatment under the law" in my book.

Worse yet is the handing out of this rapeage of high earners to the low-life that recieve 4th generation government assistane from it, and, even are "rebated" tax dollars they never paid!

17 posted on 02/25/2009 3:06:12 PM PST by traditional1 ("The American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If he taxes these people he calls rich, then who the heck does he think is going to have money to spend to stimulate the economy? Create Jobs?
Obama is just a typical socialist. Tax and spend and tax and spend and the nation and the people suffer....


18 posted on 02/25/2009 3:06:26 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Coming to You From the Front Lines of Occupied America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Pretty sure that the taxes collected will be less with this plan. It’s pretty easy to hide money and defer profits. (Just a guess)


19 posted on 02/25/2009 3:06:53 PM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The “Rich” will soon be defined as anyone whose income doesn’t already come from the government...


20 posted on 02/25/2009 3:07:23 PM PST by philled ("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson