Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN

Sorry I bothered to post. The pleading that was required was a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to the motion to dismiss by the Defendants. The judge in this matter interpreted the pleading that was filed as being filed by a paralegal. The judge then gave the Plaintiff’s until tomorrow at 5 pm to file the the correct responsive pleading or show cause why the case should not be dismissed.


71 posted on 02/25/2009 6:53:35 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: montanajoe

You are right. One of the other posters said she signed it and I overlooked that.


74 posted on 02/25/2009 6:55:55 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe

Don’t be sorry. Everyone’s post is really a contribution and we can all learn.


75 posted on 02/25/2009 6:57:22 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe

It is all very confusing, isn’t it! And I think that was the intent of this judge and his servants. But, who can tell, he fabricated an ingenious plausible deniability.


77 posted on 02/25/2009 7:00:37 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: montanajoe
Thanks for the clarification.

I actually understood that.

78 posted on 02/25/2009 7:00:46 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson