Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I did a search on this and didn't find it posted. This is weird, especially since I also read a Bret Baier report that said:

Mr. Obama also said Tuesday that the U.S. will no longer hide the price of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Today, a senior U.S. official confirmed that the president will seek $75.5 billion in additional funding for combat operations for the current fiscal year and $130 billion for the fiscal year 2010, on top of the $534 billion in the defense budget.

First of all, supplemental budgets aren't "hiding" anything (as the report indicated), they are just separate from normal DoD appropriations to help them pass through congress faster. They still end up as public record once passed.

Any DoD budget is internal to DoD until signed by the President. So why go to this length? What are they trying to hide in their new transparent government? National security my shiny metal a...

1 posted on 02/26/2009 4:35:02 AM PST by meowmeow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: meowmeow
watch what he does, not what he says
2 posted on 02/26/2009 4:37:53 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow
I'm sure the NY Times will be reporting on all the Top Secret info like they did during Bush's time in office.
3 posted on 02/26/2009 4:38:49 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow
Also in the Baier report it said, "And congressional Democrats have never liked war supplementals."

...Because money in a supplemental war appropriation must be used for its intended purpose: the troops. Can't divert it or tack on 1 million for the perverted arts. Of course they don't like it - they can't steal it as easily!

4 posted on 02/26/2009 4:39:15 AM PST by meowmeow (In Loving Memory of Our Dear Viking Kitty (1987-2006))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow

Hiding money for their new Shining Path People’s National Defense Force.

That, and they don’t want people to se the gigantic cuts into our defense and intelligence budgets.


5 posted on 02/26/2009 4:40:20 AM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

http://www.militaryfamiliesunited.org/

#

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Security/Default.aspx?id=428292

“Obama putting military in harm’s way?”
Chad Groening - OneNewsNow - 2/26/2009 5:00:00 AM

SNIPPET: “A military advocacy organization is not happy with President Barack Obama’s plans to drastically cut defense spending by $53 billion.”


8 posted on 02/26/2009 4:44:32 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow

Why? Simple: they are going to eviserate the Defense budget and don’t want anyone complaining about it till its too late.


9 posted on 02/26/2009 4:44:40 AM PST by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow

Transparency, Ha. They always have one more excuse why they have to hide what they are up to.

People ought to see this as truely frightening. You know they are up to no good and something that is not Constitutional in nature.


10 posted on 02/26/2009 4:45:06 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow
IF this would have been an action HELPING America
this would have been leaked by the New York Times.

Instead, therefore, one ought reasonably consider that
this might be another of Pres.Obama's plans, which on examination are more than favorable to
the enemies of the people of the United States of America.


11 posted on 02/26/2009 4:49:52 AM PST by Diogenesis (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Related Link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2193441/posts


13 posted on 02/26/2009 4:54:18 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow

...The DoD budget has been reduces to a packet of old food-stamps and a couple of jars of [contaminated] peanut-butter.


14 posted on 02/26/2009 5:07:54 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow

More suppresion of free speech!

This a$$hat is shutting down public debate on the subject of tearing down our national security infrastructure.

This tactic allows Obama to cut programs without anybody knowing about it until it’s a done deal.

They call it a DICTATORSHIP!!!!!!!!


15 posted on 02/26/2009 5:22:35 AM PST by G Larry (Obama's plan = "STEALING FROM THOSE WHO CREATE THE JOBS!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meowmeow
Defense Department press secretary Geoff Morrell told reporters that Secretary Robert Gates made the unusual request out of concern for national security.

We know that the DoD is coming under Obama's axe. We also know that when Defense budgets (or any other budgets) are formulated that there is a lot of in-fighting and the leaks tend to come from the program managers who are facing the cuts. Neither Obama nor Gates want to be answering a lot of tough questions about specific program cuts before the budget gets rammed through. That is what this is all about.

16 posted on 02/26/2009 8:12:44 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson