Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio chip coming soon to your driver's license?
http://wnd.com ^ | February 28, 2009 | By Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/01/2009 3:12:39 PM PST by Lucky9teen

Privacy advocates are issuing warnings about a new radio chip plan that ultimately could provide electronic identification for every adult in the U.S. and allow agents to compile attendance lists at anti-government rallies simply by walking through the assembly.

The proposal, which has earned the support of Janet Napolitano, the newly chosen chief of the Department of Homeland Security, would embed radio chips in driver's licenses, or "enhanced driver's licenses."

"Enhanced driver's licenses give confidence that the person holding the card is the person who is supposed to be holding the card, and it's less elaborate than REAL ID," Napolitano said in a Washington Times report.

REAL ID is a plan for a federal identification system standardized across the nation that so alarmed governors many states have adopted formal plans to oppose it. However, a privacy advocate today told WND that the EDLs are many times worse.

Radio talk show host and identity chip expert Katherine Albrecht said REAL ID earned the opposition of Christians because of its resemblance to the biblical "mark of the beast," civil libertarians opposed it for its "big brother" connotations and others worried about identity theft issues with the proposed databases.

"We got rid of the REAL ID program, but [this one] is way more insidious," she said.

Enhanced driver's licenses have built-in radio chips providing an identifying number or information that can be accessed by a remote reading unit while the license is inside a wallet or purse.

The technology already had been implemented in Washington state, where it is promoted as an alternative to a passport for traveling to Canada. So far, the program is optional.

But there are other agreements already approved with Michigan, Vermont, New York and Arizona, and plans are under way in other states, including Texas, she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; chip; driverslicense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Just wondering,if you put one of these licenses in a microwave oven for a few seconds,wouldn`t that fry the chips?That`d be a pity,any other ideas on how that could happen?
41 posted on 03/01/2009 4:56:02 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
Anybody know any ways to render them useless?

Don't get an enhanced license. The Washington enhanced license is offered as an alternative to using a passport for crossing into Canada via car or boat. It is intended for people that make frequent trips and want an appropriate ID to put in their wallet.

If you don't want/need an enhanced license for border crossing, don't get one. The regular Washington license is a run of the mill variety license.

42 posted on 03/01/2009 5:10:54 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Raybbr are you doing a Vulcan mind scan on me? I had the tinfoil idea at the same time.
Think I’ll carry one of those cattle eartag radios in my wallet along with tinfoil DL. “Uh, we have Mr. Moo in the third row waving the Join or Die flag”.


43 posted on 03/01/2009 5:12:02 PM PST by dusttoyou (HNIC Prime Minister Hitlery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

How does this interact with the 4A?

It has already been established that IR scans to detect pot growing operations are illegal.

Now there is the fine point of law that you already know about the RFID chip in the license or passport and it could turn out that a passport is legal and a license not, but those RFID scanners can work a distances greater than 33 feet.

I just plain don’t like the idea of being identified at a distance by the government.


44 posted on 03/01/2009 7:22:04 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

bttt


45 posted on 03/01/2009 7:39:33 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
How does this interact with the 4A?

Interesting question. I wouldn't be surprised if the government argument would be based on the license being property of the government.

Reasonable expectation of privacy and free movement would be the counter to that argument.

46 posted on 03/01/2009 9:16:59 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Anvil. Hammer. Solved.


47 posted on 03/02/2009 9:08:14 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alfie

Much better. LOL


48 posted on 03/02/2009 7:27:33 PM PST by libsmacker75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dan Middleton

History has been unfair to Franco. He has been pigeon-holed as a fascist by the tenured Marxists who dominate “higher education.”

Franco stopped a Communist revolution. Lamentably, given the unique circumstances of the 1930s, he also had no choice but to make an accommodation with Hitler. This was a pragmatic decision to protect a modicum of independence for Spain.

In the end, Franco stamped out Communism. Was he, at times, brutal? Undoubtedly. But sometimes you have to be brutal when stamping out an inhuman internal enemy—precisely what we’re facing in this country.


49 posted on 03/02/2009 7:35:23 PM PST by libsmacker75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

Give me a ticket for “No License In Possession”!


50 posted on 03/02/2009 7:38:03 PM PST by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson