1 posted on
03/07/2009 10:42:06 PM PST by
neverdem
To: Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; Battle Axe; null and void; ...
2 posted on
03/07/2009 10:43:30 PM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
.............zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.............
Although, I’m sure it’s a great article.
Bookmark for, whenever.
3 posted on
03/07/2009 10:47:38 PM PST by
period end of story
(Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
To: neverdem
More research is needed before buckyballs can be used in water treatment plants. “The main drawback is that we don’t know the effect of nanoparticles in the environment,” Gunsch says.The voters didn't know the effect of Democrats and RINOs in the environment but elected them anyway.
To: neverdem
Interesting article, thanks.
6 posted on
03/07/2009 11:31:34 PM PST by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: neverdem
Maybe they can make some buckyballs for cleaning catheters and other hospital equipment that gets contaminated with biofilm too.
9 posted on
03/07/2009 11:46:12 PM PST by
Yaelle
To: neverdem
In such trying times, it’s always reassuring to see what the human mind is still managing to accomplish. Fascinating article, thanks!
10 posted on
03/07/2009 11:49:28 PM PST by
tanuki
(Summum ius summa injuria. (The more law, the less justice))
To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
11 posted on
03/08/2009 12:34:42 AM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
Fascinating, thanks for posting.
12 posted on
03/08/2009 12:55:20 AM PST by
agere_contra
(So ... where's the birth certificate?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson