Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States' Rights and Our Liberties
The American Thinker ^ | March 08, 2009 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 03/08/2009 1:47:36 AM PST by Scanian

The current American system of government, the one created by our Constitution, was formed out of thirteen sovereign states. Among all the myriad threats to our liberty, the disintegration of the independent rights of state governments is, in many ways, the most dangerous threat.

"States' rights" has gotten a bad name. This vital principle of American government has been linked to Dixiecrat racism and thug rule by local bosses. The reality is very different. States are the best agents for protecting the rights of minorities. The mashing of states into lifeless appendages of the federal government poses dangers for freedom and for the rights of the oppressed.

Mormons were hounded across our nation until they settled in Utah and the Rocky Mountain region. Once safe, Mormons became patriotic and productive Americans. Their faith was protected by a powerful local political influence. People who admired the values of Mormons could live happily in Utah; those who wanted a different lifestyle could live anywhere else.

Jews and Catholics left Europe to escape persecution. They found sanctuary in America, but more specifically Jews and Catholics found governments sympathetic to their culture, faith, and interests in the industrial, urbanized North. Jews, Irish, and Italians established their own version of America in those cities and states.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; constitution; federalism; liberty; lping; nullificationcontrov; statesrights

1 posted on 03/08/2009 1:47:36 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

Cue the Bocephus “If the South Woulda Won the War”


2 posted on 03/08/2009 4:13:46 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Private First Class - 1/16/09 - Parris Island, SC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

We have slept while the cancer called liberalsim now called socialism, festered and turned terminal in our states.


3 posted on 03/08/2009 6:10:50 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Government is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake

Ping!


4 posted on 03/08/2009 10:25:27 AM PDT by JSDude1 (R(epublicans) In Name Only SUCK; D(emocrats) In Name Only are worth their weight..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
5 posted on 03/08/2009 12:54:20 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1; Scanian
Thanks JSDude1. Thoughtful article that is being parked on our 10th Amendment/States Rights archive thread.
6 posted on 03/08/2009 1:15:58 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately. - B.Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scanian; SunkenCiv; BP2; GreatOne; AJFavish; holdonnow; bamahead; socialismisinsidious; ...
The term states' rights is not in the Constitution, nor is it appropriate in to use at all in reference to a society in which rights of private citizens are divinely endowed. Therefore, according to the founding documents, only humans and private entities have rights, and government at any level has no rights, but has only those powers ceded to it by the governed. The appropriate term is states' powers.

States' powers do not necessarily lead to benign results, and have been all too often abused, as have powers of all governments on all levels.

So, though state governments do have a definite role to play in the American federal system, let's not go overboard in lauding them from either an historical or contemporary perspective.

7 posted on 03/08/2009 2:13:27 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ..
only humans and private entities have rights, and government at any level has no rights, but has only those powers ceded to it by the governed. The appropriate term is states' powers.
well put, justiceseeker93.
8 posted on 03/08/2009 2:53:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

nullification controversy
Dogpile

9 posted on 03/08/2009 2:54:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; SunkenCiv

Well put - and I agree to a certain extent with your premise.

But in the eyes of the Federal Gov’t, a ‘state’ has traditionally been considered as a single sovereign entity among the many sovereign entities that make up the USA.

So in the sense of the relationship between the states and the Federal Gov’t....you could term it that the ‘states’ as an individual entities has certain rights, which cannot be trounced upon per Amendment X.

Now when it comes to the relationship between the individual and the state AND the federal in terms of the Citizen / Gov’t relationship, we’re on the same page, absolutely. Just using the words a bit differently.


10 posted on 03/09/2009 11:28:17 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bamahead
... you could term it that the 'states' as ... individual entities has [sic] certain rights, which cannot be trounced upon per Amendment X.

No, I think there is an important difference between the words "rights" and "powers." Amendment X reserves powers "to the States respectively, or to the people." It does not use the word "rights" in connection with the states. "State's Rights" is and has been pure political jargon, not a constitutional principle.

11 posted on 03/09/2009 2:30:49 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; bamahead
The term states' rights is not in the Constitution, nor is it appropriate in to use at all in reference to a society in which rights of private citizens are divinely endowed. Therefore, according to the founding documents, only humans and private entities have rights, and government at any level has no rights, but has only those powers ceded to it by the governed. The appropriate term is states' powers.

bamahead: --you could term it that the 'states' as ... individual entities has [sic] certain rights, which cannot be trounced upon per Amendment X.

No, I think there is an important difference between the words "rights" and "powers." Amendment X reserves powers "to the States respectively, or to the people." It does not use the word "rights" in connection with the states. "State's Rights" is and has been pure political jargon, not a constitutional principle.

Well, and precisely put, justiceseeker..
States cannot write laws, nor can their constitutions violate our individual rights to "life, liberty or property, without due process of law"..

Moreover, it makes no difference at all if we are 'divinely' endowed. -- Our rights are self evident and inalienable, regardless of who we see as our creator.

12 posted on 03/11/2009 12:57:29 PM PDT by jtom36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake; bamahead

Ping!


13 posted on 03/11/2009 4:14:59 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake; bamahead

Ah. See you’re both already here!


14 posted on 03/11/2009 4:15:44 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking

What the heck, BUMP anyway. I appreciate you keeping me in mind.


15 posted on 03/11/2009 4:25:25 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately. - B.Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson