Nope! Big government has no business telling the mother what to do with her body if the fetus can only survive because of her body.
By your argument it should be illegal for a woman to undergo hysterectomy because she is killing potential life. By your argument it would be illegal for a man to masturbate since he is killing live sperms capable of producing life.
Sorry, I do not want big government to have that much power.
Now when the fetus has progressed to the point when it can be saved by any means including hospital intensive care, then I am 100% against aborting that life.
Who determines when the boundary is reached? That is a question which can be debated. I would guess no abortion should be legal after first trimester.
However I fully respect your decision not to have abortions in your own situation. Just don’t force your beliefs on all others using big government as the big stick.
That, my FRiend, is the very heart of the pro-abortion philosophy. Viability is a straw-man. No baby can live without it's mother or a surrogate. That does not mean they are not live humans. There is nothing "potential" about the life of an unborn baby. Take a look at a 4G sonogram, even of a first trimester baby. That is innocent human life.
I will pray for your eyes to be open.