President Obama recently lifted a Bush created ban against federally funding embryonic stem cell research. Is it a good idea?
Yes, embryonic stem cell research is important.
No, embryonic stem cell research is morally wrong.
Poll is about 1/3 of the way down on right side.
The correct answer is ~ “No. It’s wasting money on a failed technology”.
Yes, embryonic stem cell research is important. 149 | 55.6%
No, embryonic stem cell research is morally wrong.119 | 44.4%
The correct answer is ~ “No. It’s wasting money on a failed technology”.
54 Yes
45 No
Stupid people...
Yes, embryonic stem cell research is important. 150 | 54.55%
No, embryonic stem cell research is morally wrong.125 | 45.45%
Do you think the government should federally fund embryonic stem cell research.
President Obama recently lifted a Bush created ban against federally funding embryonic stem cell research. Is it a good idea?
Yes, embryonic stem cell research is important. 146 | 61.6%
No, embryonic stem cell research is morally wrong. 91 | 38.4%
No 46%
so the only No reason is moral? how biased.
ping
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
No, it is morally wrong AND scientifically stupid.
It’s not the business of government to distort research priorities with tax dollars.
This is money poured down the drain to satisfy the Planned Parenthood baby killers.
58% say NO now. This poll will disappear soon.
The two answers are a straw man argument. It isn't a choice between doing something important and doing something immoral. Given the consistent failure of ESCs to produce any viable therapies as opposed to ASCs and CBSCs which have done very well the poll choice is a logical fallacy.
The real choice is between funding an immoral course of research that holds no real promise and funding a morally neutral course of research that holds great promise. That makes the decision to pursue ESC research immoral on two grounds. One; it takes a human life. Two; it deprives successful research of needed funding.
Liberals can say nothing without lying.