Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meeting Justice Scalia
DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION ^ | 3/10/2009 | Dr. Orly Taitz

Posted on 03/10/2009 2:45:03 PM PDT by SBD1

Meeting Justice Scalia

At any rate I got to this meeting with Scalia. I stood there the whole time right by the mic, just to make sure I have an opportunity to ask a question. Only four lawyers out of about 300 in the audience got to ask their questions and I was lucky to be one of them. I told Scalia, that I was an attorney who filed Lightfoot v Bowen that Chief Justice Roberts distributed for conference on Jan 23 and now i represent 9 State reps and 120 military officers, many of them high ranked and I want to know if they will hear Quo Warranto and if they would hear it on Original Jurisdiction, if I bring Hawaii as an additional defendant to unseal the records and ascertain Obama's legitimacy for presidency.

I have to say that I prepared myself to a lot of boo-ing, knowing that Los Angeles trial lawyers and entertainment elite are Obama's stronghold, however there was no boo-ing, no negative remarks, I actually could see a lot of approving nods, smiles, many gasped and listened intensely. I could tell, that even Obama's strongest supporters wanted to know the answer.

Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get 4 people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument. I got a feeling that he was saying that one of these 4 that call themselves Constitutionalists, went to the other side. He did not say that it is a political question, he did not say that it is for the legislature to decide. For example, right after me another attorney has asked him about his case of taxing some Internet commerce and right away Scalia told him that he should address it with the legislature. He did not say it to me. He did not say that quo warranto is antiquated or not appropriate, no, just get 4. Right after that he went into the issue of the 17th amendment. He stated that today the Congress and the Senate are not accountable to the states and can do whatever they please. He stated, that when the rules of the game were changed in 1913, when the senators were no longer chosen by the state legislature, but rather elected, therefor they are not accountable to the states, cannot be recalled by the state and that is why there is such an overreaching power by the federal government. The way I understood it, is that maybe the 17th amendment needs to be repealed or maybe we should check our voting machines, since the Sequoia software in our voting machines is owned by the communist Hugo Chavez. of Venezuela.

Right after the presentation there was a book signing. I bought two books-regular and limited edition of his "Making the Case, the Art of Persuading Judges" (the limited edition alone was $150) . I stood at the end of the line and let everyone else go ahead of me. I figured while he is signing two books, me being the last and he is not rushed, he might have a minute to ask another question. So, after another hour on my feet (after I stood for a couple of hours at the presentation), I gave him the books to sign and asked "Tell me what to do, what can I do, those soldiers can be court martialed for asking a legitimate question, who is the president, is he legitimate". He said, bring the case, I'll hear it, I don't know about others. I asked, tell me what happened before, why Lightfoot v Bowen was not heard, what about Berg, Wrotnownski, Donofrio- he had a bewildered look on his face, he kept saying- I don't know, I don't remember, I don't know, I don't remember. Scalia seems to be one of the most decent judges on this court. I think he was telling the truth. Could it be that the cases, were handled by those nefarious clerks, those "mahers", that work for who knows who and the judges are clueless? I don't know. At the end I gave him my 164 page dossier, that I've sent to Holder about all the suspected criminal activity, intimidation harrassment, cyber crime surrounding me and officer Easterling. Scalia seemed to be interested and started reading the first page, he put it next to him, but then the secret service agent grabbed it. What could I do at theis point? Wrestle with the secret service? Clearly that wasn't the time and the place to show of my black belt Tae kwon Do skills. I just shut up and left. There was nothing else I could do at that meeting.

As I was driving home and getting phone calls from people around the country, that were reporting my blog down, I was thinking, Who is the Praetorian guard running this country? I remembered that I submitted quo Warranto as a supplemental brief to Roberts and the clerk Danny Bickle refused to docket it, saying "it is not what we do". I asked for an explanation, I asked for him to call me and offered my number. He just laughed and said that he definitely knows my number, the whole Supreme Court does. He promised to send the brief back with an explanation, as to why he didn't docket it. I never got it back and I never got an explanation, I have no clue if Roberts ever saw the brief and of course it was never distributed to the rest of the judges.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; eligibilitydrorly; obama; obamatruthfile; orlytaitz; taitz
How could Justice Scalia claim that he didn't know or couldn't remember any of the several lawsuits supposedly distributed to the entire court!!
1 posted on 03/10/2009 2:45:04 PM PDT by SBD1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SBD1

BTTT

This was posted already

But thanks.


2 posted on 03/10/2009 2:48:25 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Skeletons in the closet.


3 posted on 03/10/2009 2:48:41 PM PDT by wastedyears (April 21st, 2009 - International Iron Maiden Day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

How could he not have heard of it? Even if he never surfs the internet, how could he not?


4 posted on 03/10/2009 2:49:01 PM PDT by TheThinker (Shame and guilt mongering is the Left's favorite tool of control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

"I was not here. We did not meet. This ex parte meeting never happened."

5 posted on 03/10/2009 2:50:40 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological personalities." - Dune)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

My guess is that he was just hoping you’d leave and was being as politely evasive as he could possibly be to further that end.


6 posted on 03/10/2009 2:52:20 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

bump


7 posted on 03/10/2009 2:54:26 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

I can see it all now....
You don’t look into O’bama’s past......
And he won’t look into Bush & Cheney & Rumsfeld’s.....

We’ve got to look “forward” .....


8 posted on 03/10/2009 2:54:27 PM PDT by Dixiekraut (( Rommell...you magnificent bastard . I READ YOUR BOOK !!! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

>Scalia stated that it would be heard if I can get 4 people to hear it. He repeated, you need four for the argument.

Maybe it’s a reference to common law Grand Jury.
http://www.riseupforamerica.com/
Search: “Confirmatio Cartarum, Article 1”
(Read Section 2 — PROCEDURE II: Enforcement)


9 posted on 03/10/2009 2:58:31 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
How could Justice Scalia claim that he didn't know or couldn't remember any of the several lawsuits supposedly distributed to the entire court!!

Because they get about 8000 cases asking for cert every year, divided by 27 conference days on a nine month court calendar. That's almost 300 cases per conference.

10 posted on 03/10/2009 3:07:54 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

it is not Scalia’s place to say what goes on behind the closed doors. Scalia should of reminded him that.


11 posted on 03/10/2009 3:12:46 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

[Quote]What could I do at theis point? Wrestle with the secret service? Clearly that wasn’t the time and the place to show of my black belt Tae kwon Do skills. I just shut up and left. There was nothing else I could do at that meeting.[UnQuote]

I heard there was this one gang in high school that wanted you to join because they heard you were pretty good with a bow staff.


12 posted on 03/10/2009 3:27:16 PM PDT by ThankGod4W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

When a judge on the USSC says “I would hear it” about the case deciding if Obama is qualified...then why are people pushing this still regarded as kooks?


13 posted on 03/11/2009 6:46:43 AM PDT by icwhatudo (The Dow is down nearly 6,000 points since democrats took back congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
excellent work, keep at it

but don't try to show Tao Kwon Do to Secret Service agents - their training is a wee bit more sophisticated than that ;-)
14 posted on 03/12/2009 2:48:50 PM PDT by CzarChasm (My opinion. No charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson