Posted on 03/11/2009 4:15:30 AM PDT by AJMCQ
It’s Thomas. Just like Powell , color before country.
Fascinating. Maybe they’ll make a move about that someday.
Oh. Wait... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056218/
It would seem that if the Supreme Court wanted to see a document as part of an active case that they'd agreed to hear, they could (possibly, at least) subpoena that document.
Honestly, Id drop the whole matter if Scalia & Co looked at it in private and stated that Bammy was eligible under the Constitution.
I am unaware of anything in the US Constitution or in any body of law that gives the Supreme Court the right to act as an investigative body in the absence of an active case. If anyone is aware of such a law, I'd like to see it.
...... that would require the evidence to be presented in court. Yes, I probably would accept that if they reviewed the original vault copy of Obama’s birth certificate. I don’t believe they would approve Obama’s Presidency if the document proves he was NOT born a natural born American citizen. I firmly do not believe that he was.
What is Obama hiding?
Agreed!
I don’t understand why I’ve read numerous comments (all over, not just fr—pointing the finger at Justice Thomas???)
IF anything—I could understand some finger pointing in the general direction of roberts!
After all, he is the one w/his invite to visit the sc a week or so prior to swearing in (the first swearing in) and with a case then currently pending in his court—then...participated (again) in the second unrecorded swearing in after inauguration.....makes one wonder doesn’t it???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.