Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama budget director: We'll cut pork after '09 spending bill(Bush's fault on this one, though)
cnn ^ | 3/11/09

Posted on 03/11/2009 5:52:31 AM PDT by bestintxas

Facing mounting criticism of a spending package packed with billions of dollars in earmarks, the Obama administration made a vow Sunday: This president will bring a halt to pork-laden bills.

Peter Orszag says it is too late to cut earmarks from the spending bill inherited from the Bush administration.

"[Such bills] will not happen when the president has the full legislative and appropriations process in place," Peter Orszag, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, told CNN's "State of the Union with John King."

He argued that the White House had little choice but to support the $410 billion omnibus spending bill, which it inherited from the previous administration. The bill would keep the government running through 2009.

"This is like your relief pitcher coming into the ninth inning and wanting to redo the whole game," Orszag said. "Next year we're going to be the starting pitcher, and the game's going to be completely different." Watch Orszag say it's too late to fight earmarks in this spending bill »

But House Minority Whip Eric Cantor rejected the argument and noted that President Obama had vowed to take action against earmarks during the presidential campaign.

"If you make a promise, people expect that you live up to it. And that's why this administration's refusal to go in and change this bill, I think, is a false position," Cantor told "State of the Union."

"There is no way anyone could take what Mr. Orszag has said with any credibility," Cantor said. Watch Cantor criticize White House's stance »

Don't Miss Senate Democrats to consider GOP changes on spending bill Critics question Obama's pledge to end 'pork'

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhobudget; bhoomb; orszag; pork
Next time of course we will cut earmarks.
1 posted on 03/11/2009 5:52:31 AM PDT by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
...they keep forgetting about the newly elected 2006 democratic Congress.....
2 posted on 03/11/2009 5:53:46 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Charlie Brown, Lucy, and the football.


3 posted on 03/11/2009 5:55:15 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Damn. I knew it was Bush’s fault. HE’s the one who inserted all those earmarks... /sarc


4 posted on 03/11/2009 6:02:05 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear - not absence of fear. -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

“Jush wan more bottel of scotch, and then I SWEAR I’m going on the wagon honey.”


5 posted on 03/11/2009 6:05:03 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Oh okay. Now comes the massive Stimulus 2.

I am just speechless. When does it end? These people are insane.


6 posted on 03/11/2009 6:08:36 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
Peter Orszag says it is too late to cut earmarks from the spending bill inherited from the Bush administration.

Orszag is supposed to be smart, but this statement is plainly stupid. The last Congress was the 110th. Its composition was different than the current (111th) Congress. The legislation just passed was never offered during the 110th. The legislation just passed was never presented to President Bush. This budget-busting bloatstrosity may be left over work, but it is entirely the responsibility of the current (111th) Congress and the current (Zero) presidency.

7 posted on 03/11/2009 6:17:07 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (Government employment exists to provide a middle class lifestyle to otherwise, unemployable people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Of course there will be no earmarks!

Zero will, henceforth, only sign spending bills that contain Congressionally Resolved Appropriations for Procurement.


8 posted on 03/11/2009 6:24:16 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

“Orszag is supposed to be smart, but this statement is plainly stupid. “

Its a little white lie.


9 posted on 03/11/2009 7:01:46 AM PDT by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
What a pack of assholes to lie directly to the American public with a straight face and only expect a few percent to catch on.

Good heavens no wonder the economy is tanking. TRUST is breaking down everywhere.

10 posted on 03/11/2009 7:07:33 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (01-20-2009 : The end of the PAX AMERICANA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

I think that the American oublic are the assholes for believing their lies.


11 posted on 03/11/2009 7:12:55 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

Everything is Bush’s fault according to them and the idiots that call themselves the American public eat it up like a hungry man on a steak.


12 posted on 03/11/2009 7:15:28 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
Peter Orszag says it is too late to cut earmarks from the spending bill inherited from the Bush administration.

Riiight. Since Bela Pelosi has been Speaker of the House for the last two budget intervals, I'm thinking this budget bears more of HER mark and that of the Democrat party, than that of President Bush.

13 posted on 03/11/2009 11:50:45 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

Heh, vey good!


14 posted on 03/11/2009 11:51:38 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Cool, someone got it!! I thought it would be more obvious .....


15 posted on 03/11/2009 12:46:25 PM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson