Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boehner and McConnell: call Obama’s bluff on pork, offer him the Line Item Veto
The Collins Report ^ | March 12, 2009 | Kevin “Coach” Collins

Posted on 03/12/2009 6:26:51 AM PDT by jmaroneps37

Barack Obama’s smirk is wearing a bit thin. It’s tiresome to watch this man smile like the Cheshire Cat while lying to our face and treating us like children.

Monday he signed a spending bill so crammed with earmarks even ABC News labeled it a $410 billion pork-laden spending bill.” As he signed this monstrosity Obama said “behind closed doors and away from the glare of the cameras.”

The secrecy attached to Obama’s massive spending bills is something we have to live with. But if Congressional Republicans standup and fight for America’s future we might begin to slow this steamroller down.

Obama likes to talk about transparency of government even as he violates his own rules about allowing public comment about his financial strategies. Unfortunately talk is all we get. Remember we were supposed to get five days to read and review Porkulus?

This leaves calling Obama’s bluff on the earmarks he says he wants to eliminate. It’s time for John Boehner and Mitch McConnell to offer him a chance to do something about earmarks. It’s time for the GOP to offer him the Line Item Veto (LIV).

Getting a LIV conversation going will be win- win for slowing Obama down.

One of four things would come from this move.

1) The discussion could drive a wedge between the so-called “Blue Dogs” and the Pelosi Marxists.

2) This would force Pelosi and Reid to defense giving us some control of their agenda.

3) Putting the issue of LIV on the nation’s mind and lips will give the bungling Democrats something else to look inept over.

4) It could start the necessary chipping away of Obama’s approval numbers.

The Marxists have hit us with rapid fire assaults. For the past several months the daily fires have kept us busy playing defense..

(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; boehner; earmarks; lineitemveto
Watching the Democrats fight off the Line Item Veto will change some minds and move some people to us. They won't allow it, but they will look bad which is a good thing.
1 posted on 03/12/2009 6:26:51 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Nah, the DNC/Zero media will cover up for them.


2 posted on 03/12/2009 6:29:17 AM PDT by Strutt9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Why are we even discussing this moot point? We did the LIV once before and the courts struck it down as unconstitutional. Either the whole bill is signed or the whole bill is vetoed.


3 posted on 03/12/2009 6:29:39 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Socialism is the belief that most people are better off if everyone was equally poor and miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Thad Cochran 202/224-5054
Roger Wicker 202/224-6253
Chris Bond 202/224-5721
Richard Shelby 202/224-5744
Arlen Specter 202/224-4254
Lisa Murkowski 202/224-6665
Lamar Alexander 202/224-4944
Olympia Snowe 202/224-5344

These are the Republicans who grabbed earmarks with the gusto of Democrats.

Yes, it’s a tough issue considering that many voters vote based on “who brings home the bacon” but these Republicans got to be challenged.

Shelby, Alexandar, and a few others are decent ... but tough times call for tough leaders, and these guys are anything but leaders.

I’m working full time to oust Pennsylvania US Sen. Arlen Specter, and I hope other Republicans in other states do the same.


4 posted on 03/12/2009 6:40:44 AM PDT by Edit35 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
It’s time for the GOP to offer him the Line Item Veto (LIV).

The Supreme Court took a dim view of it the last time it was tried.

5 posted on 03/12/2009 6:41:47 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Exactly. The LIV has been ruled unconstitutional. I guess Congress could informally allow the WH to alter bills before passing them, but that would be ceding too much power.


6 posted on 03/12/2009 6:43:48 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Barack Obama’s smirk is wearing a bit thin. It’s tiresome to watch this man smile like the Cheshire Cat while lying to our face and treating us like children.
7 posted on 03/12/2009 6:45:36 AM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Obama dozed.....people froze.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Good play, let’s see if Bambi folds.


8 posted on 03/12/2009 6:45:41 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edit35

Alexander will not get my vote ever again PRECISELY because he does not have the wisdom and guts to do the hard thing necessary in these times.

(I doubt he’ll run again anyway.)


9 posted on 03/12/2009 6:46:16 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Edit35
Arlen Specter = Anal Sphincter
10 posted on 03/12/2009 6:55:44 AM PDT by vortigern (Watch this: http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZxBX8sz3tO8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Edit35
Ron Paul in Texas got a bunch as well. He was on fox justifying earmarks as a good thing he supported.
11 posted on 03/12/2009 7:26:21 AM PDT by edcoil (Slave owners could justify themselves too. Think about it Arnold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Because it was passed at the policy/process level.

Make it a Constitutional Amendment - it may take some time in approving but giving us “rabble” a chance to approve it would be educational!


12 posted on 03/12/2009 7:35:41 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

13 posted on 03/12/2009 7:36:41 AM PDT by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Because it was passed at the policy/process level.

And that's what ol' Coach Collins is recommending in this article. Obviously he's not as up on the subject as you and I.

Make it a Constitutional Amendment - it may take some time in approving but giving us “rabble” a chance to approve it would be educational!

Like that's going to happen. Pelosi and Reid wouldn't stand for it, and deep down Boehner and McConnell wouldn't support it either.

14 posted on 03/12/2009 7:48:51 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I agree. Too many RINOs for this to get out of the Senate as a CA.

But, just imagine the fireworks if it did because even Opossum would be against it and every American who ever balanced a checkbook woould be for it!


15 posted on 03/12/2009 7:56:00 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (FreepMail me if you want on the Bourbon ping list!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

I guess only Dems will ever get line item veto...


16 posted on 03/12/2009 8:02:58 AM PDT by GeronL (Will bankrupting America lead to socialism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

“Make it a Constitutional Amendment - it may take some time in approving but giving us “rabble” a chance to approve it would be educational!

Like that’s going to happen. Pelosi and Reid wouldn’t stand for it, and deep down Boehner and McConnell wouldn’t support it either.”
The point here is not to think we can get the LIV, but to speak to the lemmings who think we can and triangulate them into demanding answers from Obama and the Democrats. It also shows the GOP is trying to do something. As to the USSC, well they have reversed themselves before.


17 posted on 03/12/2009 8:26:32 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson