Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(from 2007) Republican Governors Who Wilt (Globalwarming Hoax)
spectator.org ^ | July 23, 2007 | Paul Chesser

Posted on 03/21/2009 1:06:51 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; BarnacleCenturion

Right now I don’t know much about Sanford and if this was a thread truly about him, I would simply read what his supporters and detractors have to say.

This isn’t a thread about Sanford though, this is a a part of the Romney machine attack that will try to pick off and weaken every serious conservative challenger to Mitt that exists and so far to me Mark Sanford sounds like one of those top three or four to date.

BarnacleCenturion signed up here as part of the Romney machine and that is what drives his posting here, his goal is to weaken challengers not to promote conservatism.

The Romney machine must attack this great pool of young conservative winners and bring them down a couple of notches to elevate their store bought package of mediocracity.


61 posted on 03/22/2009 12:05:24 PM PDT by ansel12 (Romney (guns)"instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; upchuck; Clintonfatigued; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BarnacleCenturion
Yep. While Barney C's Hero stands back and waits to assess just the perfect blend of words to soothe expectations on both sides with regard to earth-"saving" environmentalism. "Eddie Haskell" Romney is a big-government Republican opportunist, and a trojan horse to conservatism. When I see a Romney supporter doing the bashing, red flags go up all around with good reason.

Romney holds as strongly with the global warming hoax as plenty of others who should know better. EVERYTHING that is or has ever been on this old Earth is temporary. It may not seem so to us because we've only been cognizant for maybe 20,000 years. There's also the all-too-human tendency to think that if so many people are saying it, it must be true. But truth will out. I hope many politicians start to do a little reading and a little thinking. Ignorant people are gullible people.

Ponder this: according to a book on the Florida Everglades that I bought during a stay in Florida, in the past 120,000 years the Florida peninsula has been twice as large as it is now and less than half the size it is now, because of changes in sea levels. Educated people, that is a measly 120,000 years ... a lousy piddling 12 percent of only one million years. Sixty five million years ago, dinosaurs were still here, and had been here for what, another 50 million years before that?

The idea that a human being in one lifetime, or even in our kind's entire recorded history of the best we can come up with, a pipsqueak 5,000 years, could identify, let alone control, a significant change in global climate, is as laughable as the idea that a fruitfly hatched Monday can even comprehend next winter. It's as preposterous as proposing that a magic genii is responsible for firing up a Zippo lighter.

Even when everybody says the genii is starting the Zippo ... follow the truth. The truth is that environmentalism as a noble cause to save the planet and smooth the climate, is a ridiculous conceit borne of ignorance. Primitive, illiterate people have an excuse for falling for it. AMERICANS WHO FALL FOR IT HAVE ZERO EXCUSE except that they assume that so many people just couldn't be wrong, over little ol' horse-sense everyman, a bit of basic geography under his belt, math skills, and reason, could they???

Yes, they can be wrong and frequently ARE wrong, and the ones who knew so from the start were the Joe Blow independent thinkers.

62 posted on 03/22/2009 12:24:06 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exist; rabscuttle385; fieldmarshaldj

You can’t tell me he wants Obama to “succeed” being that he opposes Obama’s polices and MIGHT RUN AGAINST HIM LOL. I don’t know why you can’t grasp that.

He obviously failed to separate Obama “succeeding” from the economy improving and thus misunderstood Rush. No that’s not a point in his favor but it’s hardly a big deal.

Wait wait I know what you’re gonna say.

“Mark Hussein Sanford “

Grow up. Are you Mofopoltics.com “MP”? And if so does MP stand for “Muppet”?


63 posted on 03/23/2009 3:25:57 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Impy
You can’t tell me he wants Obama to “succeed”

I'm not telling you anything. Mark Hussein Sanford is. Mark Hussein Sanford himself is telling you that he wants Obama to succeed and that if you don't want Obama to succeed like he does, you're an idiot.

64 posted on 03/23/2009 9:55:28 AM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: exist
"Mark Hussein Sanford"

Y'know, $hit like this is beneath the dignity of DU. Knock it off.

65 posted on 03/23/2009 1:54:22 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: exist

You are going in circles and failing to rebut my argument.


66 posted on 03/23/2009 11:35:23 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Impy
You are going in circles and failing to rebut my argument.

I'm not arguing with you. Mark Hussein Sanford is.

67 posted on 03/23/2009 11:43:02 PM PDT by exist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: exist; fieldmarshaldj; Texas Federalist
"I'm not arguing with you"

Yes you are. Stop playing games. I am challenging your perception of Sanford's remark.

Me: "You can’t tell me he wants Obama to “succeed” being that he opposes Obama’s polices and MIGHT RUN AGAINST HIM LOL. I don’t know why you can’t grasp that.

He obviously failed to separate Obama “succeeding” from the economy improving and thus misunderstood Rush. No that’s not a point in his favor but it’s hardly a big deal."

Sanford opposes Obama's polices, that speaks much longer than a single remark taken out of context. If you have no constructive response I suppose we're done. Just know attempts to tear down a conservative Governor with pebble sized gripes on the behalf I suspect of a the liberal Mitt Romney will continue to be challenged.

68 posted on 03/24/2009 12:03:14 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson