Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Returned bonuses are still taxable
Vanity | 3/24/2009 | Ramius

Posted on 03/24/2009 11:14:14 AM PDT by Ramius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Ramius

No good deed goes unpunished and all that.


21 posted on 03/24/2009 11:24:46 AM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb
A bonus isn’t considered income.

Are you kidding? It's taxed as income. You may not consider it such in some particular way, but the IRS does...

22 posted on 03/24/2009 11:25:20 AM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Deb

A bouns isn’t salary, but it is income.


23 posted on 03/24/2009 11:25:30 AM PDT by Canedawg (Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

What about this...

They get taxed on the income because they can’t gift it away.

AIG gets taxed again on it as business income!


24 posted on 03/24/2009 11:26:00 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aetheraddict
Hmm... I reread the original post and realized that I just reiterated what you were saying. When you said returned I thought you meant that they had them returned from the Government after the 90% tax... oops.
25 posted on 03/24/2009 11:26:31 AM PDT by aetheraddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Verbosus
"I wonder how many of them will publicly say they will return the money - but have no intentions of it.

Don't forget, many of the people that received a bonus were located in London (as London is where AIG-FP is HQ'd). So, unless they are American citizens living abroad, this 90% tax that Congress passed is nothing more than a joke.

26 posted on 03/24/2009 11:26:49 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Another tax code trap!

Just one more reason to abolish the income tax and the IRS!

27 posted on 03/24/2009 11:27:11 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

So, you got bonuses that had taxes taken out? Then they must have changed the law because every bonus I ever got was for the whole amount. It’s the same as a residual.


28 posted on 03/24/2009 11:27:43 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
"One cannot tax income that’s been rejected, as far as I know."

What if the check was cashed?

29 posted on 03/24/2009 11:28:36 AM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Yes, that’s what I should have said.


30 posted on 03/24/2009 11:28:51 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

First they came for the AIG execs. And I did not speak up because I was not an AIG exec.... repeat.

Oh that’s right, I am speaking up.. screaming in fact. To no avail apparently.

Didn’t a famous boxer (1930s?) have to pay taxes on winnings he immediately turned over to a charity? And that bill ruined him and his career.

Lets roll.


31 posted on 03/24/2009 11:29:02 AM PDT by PfromHoGro (The first 12 paragraphs from a liberal are a lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

If the recipients give back the bonus, the employer (AIG) will need to amend the filings on the 941 payroll tax qrtly federal return. This move negates the bonus and the employee has no liability. not an unusual event to adjust payrolls in a large company.


32 posted on 03/24/2009 11:29:04 AM PDT by JHENN22499
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Then they must have changed the law because every bonus I ever got was for the whole amount. It’s the same as a residual.

Then they "grossed it up" behind the scenes, and only told you the net amount. Your $5,000 bonus, for example, would have cost your company something like $7,438.23 - but the only number they disclosed to you was the $5,000 net.

My former employer always gave us gross bonuses, so an employee would be told they got a $7,500 bonus and would receive a net check of something like $5,013.67

33 posted on 03/24/2009 11:31:37 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("If you cannot pick it up and run with it, you don't really own it." -- Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Deb
"A bonus isn’t considered income."

Holy smokes, over the years I overpaid about $100,000! Income is income.

34 posted on 03/24/2009 11:31:42 AM PDT by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; Truth29
If the funds have already been deposited, can you reject them and not have them count as income?

Does that matter? If they're returned to the giver and no realization of profit has been realized, can they really be counted as income?

Wouldn't it depend on the language of the contract? If the bonus was offered ahead of whatever triggered the "earning" of it, isn't it the same as a deposit on something? That is, the recipient of the funds is holding them, but technically they are still owned by the payer, and can be returned on demand...right?

35 posted on 03/24/2009 11:31:59 AM PDT by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Seems like a couple of the bonus recipients jumped right away to state they'll return the bonuses......probably to gain favor from someplace or other.

Too bad they don't all band together to fight this bill of attainder or fight it on the basis of the unconstitutionality of this targeted punishment by taxation.

At least they would have "standing" in the lower federal courts on up to the SCOTUS because they are the victims.

Although, if the Obama birth certificate legal battle is any indication, not too many individual U.S. citizens or organizations have the luxury of enjoying "standing" in the eyes of federal liberal judges.

Leni

36 posted on 03/24/2009 11:32:01 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Florida Freepers: Do U Know We Have a State Forum All Our Own? Freepmail me for Details!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Even if it the bonus was the full amount, with no taxes taken out of the check, it still counts as income when you do your return.

When hubby and I get our W-2s each year the total income is our salary + bonus.

If you weren’t ever paying taxes on those bonus checks someone along the way screwed up.


37 posted on 03/24/2009 11:32:43 AM PDT by elc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Yeah, I have........

And it's considered income at the end of the year also.......

38 posted on 03/24/2009 11:33:10 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Our constitution protects aliens, drunks and U.S. Senators. -Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

If you cashed the check, absolutely.


39 posted on 03/24/2009 11:33:28 AM PDT by patton (If Hawai'i seccedes, is Barack Obama still an illegal alien?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty
What if the check was cashed?

I'm no accountant. I'm just looking at this from a practical standpoint. Even though the check may be cashed and deposited, if it's ultimately returned to the giver while incurring no enrichment to the recipient, can that legally be considered taxable income?

Take someone who orders a dress from an online website (here we have the added implication of the recipient initiating the transaction). On receipt the recipient tries on the dress to find they don't like it. The dress is returned. Can that seller still charge the recipient?

40 posted on 03/24/2009 11:33:39 AM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson