Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Returned bonuses are still taxable
Vanity | 3/24/2009 | Ramius

Posted on 03/24/2009 11:14:14 AM PDT by Ramius

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: unique
It’s as if it was a mistake. No tax.

Check out posts #32 & #50. Taxes are paid for the year the bonus is paid (2009). Thus once returned, AIG files an ammended tax form and the bonus vanishes. When it comes time to pay 2009 taxes (in 2010), this will not be reported as income.

61 posted on 03/24/2009 12:04:29 PM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues
The only people that care about this bonus money are Obama followers.

This isn't about that, really... it's about the neat little box that the Dems have knitted themselves into. :-)

62 posted on 03/24/2009 12:04:52 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Doesn’t mean you didn’t pay taxes on it.


63 posted on 03/24/2009 12:08:13 PM PDT by wordsofearnest (Job 19:25 As for me, I know my Redeemer lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

I suppose AIG could try that, and the IRS may well let them get away with it for political reasons... but it’s a fraud. It does not fairly present what actually happened. It is stitching up an alternate history from the one that actually happened, IMHO.

This isn’t a “correction” to their income. It wasn’t a mistake. Saying now that it never happened may get everybody out of a fine mess, but like everything else this congress is doing... it’s a clusterf***.


64 posted on 03/24/2009 12:13:14 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

. The AIG executives that have returned their bonuses—still have to pay the tax on them anyway.

two problems. Democrats don’t pay them anyway. This could be a problem for an honest politician.

Besides the US Treasury is a charitable institution isn’t it?


65 posted on 03/24/2009 12:16:10 PM PDT by chainsaw (If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free! -- P.J..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Then they’re stoopid.


66 posted on 03/24/2009 12:23:20 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I suppose AIG could try that, and the IRS may well let them get away with it for political reasons... but it’s a fraud. It does not fairly present what actually happened.

That would be true up through the actual payment/receipt of the bonus in 2008. But it's no longer true when taking into account what transpired subsequently. If the entire scenario is taken into account, then the bonus money was rejected, AIG should be able to file an ammended declaration, and the issue goes away. I personally see no problem.

And beyond that, why were the bonuses rejected? Because the government after-the-fact voted illegally to tax them at 95%. So because the government decides to act illegally, these people should be penalized? Sorry, but thats immoral besides being illegal.

67 posted on 03/24/2009 12:25:46 PM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: zek157

Great information, thank you for sharing.


68 posted on 03/24/2009 12:29:42 PM PDT by CSM (Smokers, the most patriotic of Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
From our Payroll Manager, who runs payroll for three of our clients with 4000+ employees...

Under “normal” circumstances when a bonus is “paid” it is subject to normal withholding for FICA, FIT, SIT etc just like normal ordinary income. So if you get a bonus of $10,000 given the amounts you will wind up with a check of lets say $6,000.00.

The other $4,000 goes in to the employer's tax withholding accounts and reported on a normal basis.

However, 1 day, 2 weeks whatever down the road you can say I don't want this money and you can return it to the employer. the employer can then void that payment and correct their accounts and it will be like it never happened. This happens all the time.

Until the end of the year when your employer prepares and here is the key “reports” the W2’s for the year the feds do not know about your bonus.

That said it can create an issue for quarterly under or over payment of taxes for the employer on the 941 form so most companies hesitate to do stuff like this. But until that copy of the W2 is physically sent or electronically reported to the IRS you could return a bonus with no tax implications at that time.

69 posted on 03/24/2009 12:47:01 PM PDT by Syntyr (If its too loud your too old...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

For the amount of money some of them are getting, you could hire Blackwater to defend your home or castle.


70 posted on 03/24/2009 12:48:50 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Sorry, but thats immoral besides being illegal.

I agree with that.

71 posted on 03/24/2009 12:48:52 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Syntyr
This happens all the time.

Does it, really? People are routinely handing bonus money back to their employers? I don't see it happening very often at all.

72 posted on 03/24/2009 12:52:35 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

The Payroll Manager tells me that she performs 15 - 20 corrections of this type per pay period.

Some of our clients get bonuses every pay period depending upon performance, sales, miles travelled, a whole host of reasons. More often then you would imagine these peopel are over paid in error. Once the corrected timesheets or bonsues are calculated the employee has to return the money.

She had one employee go out on STD, Short Term Disability, but their manager neglected to put them in to STD status from the regular pay category. This person was paid for 2 months in error before it was realized. The employee even spent the money. They had 1/2 with held from future paychecks and they had to write a check for the rest of the money.


73 posted on 03/24/2009 1:03:41 PM PDT by Syntyr (If its too loud your too old...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

As long as the puppets continue to here that this is a big deal they will continue to think that it is.


74 posted on 03/24/2009 1:37:35 PM PDT by rocksblues (Sarah and Joe, Real Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
Not sure you’re using the proper analogy. If the money is returned it means it’s been rejected; not given as a gift. One cannot tax income that’s been rejected, as far as I know.

You cash the check the money is yours. Giving it back was stupid. I guess you could pay the tax then gift it back?

75 posted on 03/24/2009 4:43:28 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (We have nothing to fear but Obama himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Deb
A bonus isn’t considered income.

The IRS will be looking you up.

76 posted on 03/24/2009 4:46:00 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (We have nothing to fear but Obama himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Continue to read, especially posts #32 & 50.


77 posted on 03/24/2009 6:04:41 PM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
It's insanity, a major breach of any authority Congress, the Executive and the Fed have. It is criminal.
78 posted on 03/24/2009 6:06:46 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Clearly the bonuses are taxable as taxes were withheld. After taking the time to read this resignation letter it was not in the governments interest to drive some of these people out of AIG. It is certainly now a dead black hole of obligations.

The following is a letter sent on Tuesday by Jake DeSantis, an executive vice president of the American International Group’s financial products unit, to Edward M. Liddy, the chief executive of A.I.G.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/25/opinion/25desantis.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

“On March 16 I received a payment from A.I.G. amounting to $742,006.40, after taxes. In light of the uncertainty over the ultimate taxation and legal status of this payment, the actual amount I donate may be less — in fact, it may end up being far less if the recent House bill raising the tax on the retention payments to 90 percent stands. Once all the money is donated, you will immediately receive a list of all recipients.”

79 posted on 03/25/2009 6:14:37 AM PDT by zek157
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson