Skip to comments.
Senators Introduce Bi-Partisan Legislation To Restore Second Amendment in National Parks
NRA - ILA ^
| April 02, 2009
| NA
Posted on 04/02/2009 7:39:55 PM PDT by neverdem

·11250 Waples Mill Road · Fairfax, Virginia 22030 ·800-392-8683
Senators Introduce Bi-Partisan Legislation To Restore Second Amendment in National Parks
Thursday, April 02, 2009
Fairfax, Va. Today, U.S. Senators Mike Crapo (R-ID), Max Baucus (D-MT), Bob Bennett (R-UT), Jon Tester (D-MT) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) introduced legislation to restore the Second Amendment rights of visitors in national parks and wildlife refuges. The current Department of the Interior (DOI) regulations were amended by the Bush Administration in 2008, allowing law-abiding citizens to defend themselves by carrying a concealed firearm in national parks and wildlife refuges. However, early this year, a federal district court in Washington, D.C. granted anti-gun plaintiffs a preliminary injunction against implementation of the new rule. The NRA has been working for the past several years in the regulatory, legal, and legislative arenas to achieve this policy change.
NRA would like to thank this bi-partisan group of Senators for leading the legislative effort to strengthen right-to-carry laws on federal park lands. Sen. Crapo has been at the forefront of this fight from the very beginning, along with Sen. Baucus, said Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist. NRA is committed to changing the old, outdated rule, and will continue to work aggressively with Congress to pass this critical legislation. NRA will continue to pursue every avenue to defend the American peoples right of self-defense.
This bill would provide uniformity across our nations federal lands and put an end to the patchwork of regulations that governed different lands managed by different federal agencies. In the past, only Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands allowed the carrying of firearms, while National Parks and Wildlife Refuges did not.
In 1982, only six states allowed citizens to carry handguns for self-defense. Currently, 48 states have some process in place for issuing licenses or permits to allow law-abiding citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Two states do not require permits, 38 states have a shall-issue permit process, and eight have a discretionary process for issuing permits. The NRA has long held that amendments to those regulations were needed to reflect the changed legal situations with respect to state laws governing the carrying firearms.
This move will restore the rights of law-abiding gun owners who wish to transport and carry firearms for lawful purposes on most DOI lands, and will make federal law consistent with the state law in which these lands are located.
This is a common-sense measure. Senators Crapo, Baucus, Bennett, Tester and Lincoln should be commended for their efforts to allow law-abiding gun owners the option of protecting themselves in our federal parks and refuges. This legislation will amend out-of-date regulations and restore the Second Amendment rights of American gun owners, concluded Cox.
-NRA-
Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America's oldest civil rights and sportsmen's group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation's leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the military.
Find this item at: http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=12320
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; concealedcarry; shallnotbeinfringed
1
posted on
04/02/2009 7:39:55 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Congress did not push legislation, because they were told it would be fixed by the rule making process. Now a corrupt judge has told Congress to take a hike, the rule shall not go into effect.
Congress does not like to have little judges tell them what to do. They want to preserve their turf... so we might actually see something happen here.
2
posted on
04/02/2009 7:45:34 PM PDT
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Even if congress passes the legislation, and the punk signs it on a cold day in hell, some liberal judge will rule the law unconstitutional because of the smurfs... or something.
3
posted on
04/02/2009 7:55:22 PM PDT
by
KoRn
To: neverdem
GO, GO, otherwise crappy Montana senators. Even the Dems in Montana have to be pro-gun otherwise, BYE BYE.
4
posted on
04/02/2009 8:28:27 PM PDT
by
Lucian
(I am therefore, I'll think)
To: neverdem
5
posted on
04/02/2009 8:37:22 PM PDT
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: neverdem
Bummer, how come I never see my CA senators on these things??
To: neverdem
Here, here's a dry bone to gnaw on. Never mind the $3 trillion rape we're passing right now.
7
posted on
04/02/2009 8:55:26 PM PDT
by
TheZMan
("I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.")
To: TheZMan
I hear ya... Makes me wonder why 2A issues aren't being forced the same way.
It occurs to me: might they not be planning to use the the background check database to target 'potential non-compliers' for collection and relocation to 're-education camps' somewhere in the remote southwest (a la Meyers' Weather Underground)?
8
posted on
04/03/2009 12:06:25 AM PDT
by
plsjr
(<>< "Diversity" = "accept anything, including the worst" Choose the best on its own merits.)
To: TheZMan
The frightening part is that the masses seem numb to outrage; desensitized, ignorant, or fully in support of this rape of our country.
9
posted on
04/03/2009 12:14:56 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: neverdem
If McDonalds can be forced to pay someone for spilling coffee in their laps, can you imagine the liability for someone who has a family member mauled by a bear in a national park who was denied the right to defend themselves! All those millions would not be in the treasury to steal. Congress will act to protect its feeding trough, er, the american people! Yeah, thats the ticket, its for the people.
10
posted on
04/03/2009 12:24:06 AM PDT
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: CheneyChick
Things are heating up. Sen. Blanche Lincoln must be running scared. She usually votes against guns every chance she gets. I have read she is in danger of losing her job.
11
posted on
04/03/2009 6:08:38 AM PDT
by
seemoAR
To: seemoAR
Im in Little Rock. I couldn't believe it. I had to read the article a second time blinking!
Hmmmm...methinks 2010 will be hell on anti-gun demoncrats if they pursue gun control.
12
posted on
04/03/2009 8:30:41 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
(Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
To: American in Israel
can you imagine the liability for someone who has a family member mauled by a bear in a national park who was denied the right to defend themselves!
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but such suits have been filed before.
Always - the beast did it, therefore the gooberment isn’t responsible.
Look at it is the Marsupial Magistrate’s “Beast as God” legal theory. TO be more specific, the damage was not done by the beast owned by the gooberment, it was more of an “act of God” situation.
Said the Marsupial Magistrate: “Case Dismissed, with prejudice! And take the remains of your family member with you.”
13
posted on
04/03/2009 9:27:01 AM PDT
by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
To: neverdem
How screwed up is our country when legislation has to be passed to "restore" rights guaranteed by the Constitution???
...and which were lost or denied by those who had sworn a sacred oath to protect and defend that same Constitution?
14
posted on
04/03/2009 9:30:23 AM PDT
by
TChris
(There is no freedom without the possibility of failure.)
To: DCBryan1
I have e mailed the Honorable Blanche Lincoln several times about gun control. I think she blocked any messages from me after I asked about her 30 pieces of silver. ;0)
15
posted on
04/04/2009 5:06:52 AM PDT
by
seemoAR
To: seemoAR
Nothing honorable about “blank” lincoln.
16
posted on
04/04/2009 6:46:31 AM PDT
by
DCBryan1
(Arm Pilots&Teachers. Build the Wall. Export Illegals. Profile Muslims. Execute child molesters RFN!)
To: DCBryan1
I just love sarcasm. I wonder how Blanche could be blanched.
17
posted on
04/04/2009 7:08:35 AM PDT
by
seemoAR
To: seemoAR
Sen. Blanche Lincoln must be running scared. She usually votes against guns every chance she gets. I have read she is in danger of losing her job.They ALL need to be afraid of losing their job.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson