Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Rejects Protecting Abortion-Conscience Rights for Doctors
LifeNews.com ^ | April 3, 2009 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 04/03/2009 8:46:28 AM PDT by julieee

Washington, DC -- The Senate on Thursday night rejected an amendment from a pro-life senator that would have provided conscience protection on abortion for doctors and medical centers. The amendment comes at a time when President Barack Obama is considering overturning further protections.

(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; conscience; conscienceclause; doctors; prolife; protecting; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 04/03/2009 8:46:29 AM PDT by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

So we’re to the point of the government forcing doctors to perform abortions against their wishes? That’s dangerously close to Nazi eugenics in my view. Joseph Mengele would be proud.


2 posted on 04/03/2009 8:48:27 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee; wagglebee

OK, let’s just say it, shall we? This poop chute is not ‘pro-choice’, he’s pro-death for those who can’t defend themselves, whose cries of pain and anguish can’t be heard from the cramped watery apartments in which they live their innocent little lives as they’re being torn limb from limb.

I hate this _______.


3 posted on 04/03/2009 8:50:27 AM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

This is a powerful moral issue, much like slavery was before and during the American Civil War.


4 posted on 04/03/2009 8:52:05 AM PDT by Need4Truth (The world needs a policeman but the U.S. can't afford the job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Very scary indeed.


5 posted on 04/03/2009 8:53:38 AM PDT by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Need4Truth

Let’s see - one set of humans defining another set of humans as less human and therefore subject to the whims of the first set, up to and including their extermination.

Sounds pretty analogous to me.


6 posted on 04/03/2009 8:53:46 AM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

> That’s dangerously close to Nazi eugenics in my view.

Dangerously close? It’s the same.

There are OB/GYN practitioners who will retire or become dentists and osteopaths rather than being forced to perform abortions.

Of course, this fits right in with government plans to take over and ration “health care”, which used to be called “medicine” or the “medical profession”.

Imagine the people who run the government schools running the hospitals and clinics.

> Joseph Mengele would be proud.

So would Josef Stalin.


7 posted on 04/03/2009 8:55:41 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: julieee
I posted this on another thread but I'm going to repost it here.

This is part of the ongoing struggle being waged at the UN and in the corridors of power of various governments to have abortion proclaimed as a "human right". Once that happens the deluge will begin in earnest. Hospitals and physicians who refuse to perform these procedures will be deemed to be guilty of "human rights violations". Then the persecution will hit top gear.

At present, abortion is a "choice". However, the "pro-choice" folk aren't content with that for it allows for the possibility of dissent and claims of conscience. There can be no escape route for those who object to abortion. Dissent must be silenced. You will cooperate with the killing.

Punitive actions will then be imposed, with increasing severity, on those who obstinately deny "the people" their "human rights". We're rapidly approaching the time when we'll no longer be able to simply talk the talk. We'll have to stand up and be counted and suffer for our beliefs.

8 posted on 04/03/2009 8:59:35 AM PDT by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

The Congress HAS NO CONSCIENCE! THEY ARE FOR LATE TERM ABORTION AND IN FACT FOR ALL ABORTION ANYTIME ANYPLACE ANYWHERE AS LED BY THEIR CHIEF BABY KILLER OBUMMER!


9 posted on 04/03/2009 9:00:56 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: julieee

I might have miscounted but the nays were:

Spector
Snowe
Collins

Casey voted yea
Let’s see Toomey use that as an ad.


10 posted on 04/03/2009 9:01:57 AM PDT by LeavingNewYork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee; St. Louis Conservative; definitelynotaliberal; Need4Truth; jveritas; MrB

Complete violation of the First Amendment.

Express your opposition to Obama’s heinous plan to overturn the Provider Conscience Clause by emailing proposedrescission@hhs.gov.

This “public comment” period expires April 9.


11 posted on 04/03/2009 9:03:46 AM PDT by fullchroma (I want my country back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee
Next up under the Obama Doctrine:

Pay caps for all doctors...it's a national necessity

/wish it was sarcasm

12 posted on 04/03/2009 9:05:16 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

From Wikipedia

A conscientious objector (CO) is an individual who, on religious, moral or ethical grounds, refuses to participate as a combatant in war or, in some cases, to take any role that would support a combatant organization armed forces.

Will the Senate now address this issue and render the same verdict ?

didnt think so


13 posted on 04/03/2009 9:06:47 AM PDT by Einherjar (PEACE THROUGH SUPERIOR FIREPOWER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: julieee; Mrs. B.S. Roberts

Does anyone out there have a, or know of, a list of CATHOLIC senators who have voted to PREVENT their fellow CATHOLICS from obeying their deeply held religious beliefs?
I’d be very curious. How did that most observant Catholic from Massachusetts, E.M.Kennedy vote? Just curious.


14 posted on 04/03/2009 9:11:44 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (NY Times: We print the news as it fits our views)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Doctors just should say no.


15 posted on 04/03/2009 9:19:20 AM PDT by ex-snook ( "Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Um...m...m, that’s the right they just lost.


16 posted on 04/03/2009 9:23:05 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All

Now is the time, folks, to decide if we’re just going to fall in line — or draw one.


17 posted on 04/03/2009 9:24:27 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

This shows you how little the RATS truly care about the availability of healthcare services. Catholic hospitals might just shut down because of this, reducing the availability of all kinds of services. But it’s more important to these RATS to make a political statement!


18 posted on 04/03/2009 9:25:24 AM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAmiigaf

Kennedy did not vote (probably was not present). Kerry and Landrieu voted nay. I believe both claim to be Catholic.


19 posted on 04/03/2009 9:26:07 AM PDT by freespirited (Is this a nation of laws or a nation of Democrats? -- Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Ys, like they’re going to lock up all the doctors who refuse. Then where is “national health care.” Suing doctors will have the same effect.

Watch for the Catholic hospitals to close, too.


20 posted on 04/03/2009 9:26:57 AM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson