Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders investigation of Stevens prosecutors
AP - Yahoo News ^ | April 7, 2009 | AP

Posted on 04/07/2009 9:02:13 AM PDT by VRWCTexan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: VRWCTexan
"In nearly 25 years on the bench, I've never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I've seen in this case,"

Scooter Libby trial?

61 posted on 04/07/2009 10:33:14 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

I understand the facts of the case. My remarks had to do with the final outcome. Not favorable for Republicans.

Am I wrong? Of course not.


62 posted on 04/07/2009 10:33:14 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
And the really sad part is that more Republicans were prosecuted during the Bush years than Democrats. And it was George W Bush’s own Department of Justice who violated their own rules to interfere in primaries and general elections to prevent Republicans from winning office.

You're absolutely right.

The Justice Department was (and still is) corrupt with Clintonites when W got there and even worse when he left.

W's obsession with "let's all get along" was dead on arrival but he couldn't figure it out or was too stubborn to admit he was wrong.

As much as I admire the man, he screwed the pooch on this one. He should have done much more than he did to help clean up this infested group.

63 posted on 04/07/2009 10:35:33 AM PDT by evad (YES!! I WANT Obama's Agenda TO FAIL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 101voodoo

These are career prosecutors ... not US Attorneys who the POTUS can fire, as did Clinton and eventually Bush.

The government is FULL of leftists in every branch, agency and department, who lay in wait for an opportunity like this to take down a Republican.

Judge Emmet Sullivan himself is, I believe, a Democrat .. perhaps the last honest one in DC.


64 posted on 04/07/2009 10:40:30 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
"Except Senator Stevens was indicted and prosecuted by the Bush administration’s Justice Department and the charges were dropped by a Democrat. The Judge in the Stevens case is a Clinton appointee to his current position on the US District Court bench.

In many respects, the DOJ is very much like the DOS. It's populated with career bureaucrats that frequently have a left-wing bent. Sure, there was a Bush political appointee (as US Attorney) that was in charge of the district office, but it was "career" prosecutors that managed the case and are now facing scrutiny.

Assuming for a minute that Bush's appointed US Attorney for that district (USA) became of aware of the states problems, what were they to do - in a practical sense. Remember, this trial was held during a contentious and politically charged time. If Bush's USA would have dropped the charges, the DEMS would have screamed bloody murder and the press would have had a field day.

Having said that, there isn't any allegation the US attorney was aware of the misconduct of the assigned prosecutors and FBI agents handling the case.

So, to use a phrase like "this was a Bush Administration" prosecution, is terribly misleading - IMHO.

65 posted on 04/07/2009 10:41:38 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
It is a delightful thought, but I'm not holding my breath with MR Holder and his DOJ.
66 posted on 04/07/2009 10:41:43 AM PDT by starlifter (Sapor Amo Pullus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

me thinks, Judge not too happy


67 posted on 04/07/2009 10:45:03 AM PDT by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; jamese777
"Judge Emmet Sullivan himself is, I believe, a Democrat .. perhaps the last honest one in DC.

Sullivan's political affiliation is not clear. He was first appointed to the bench by Reagan. He was subsequently elevated by both HW Bush and then by Clinton.

My guess is he's more interested in the law than in political ideology. Which, probably makes him sadly uncommon in today's judiciary.

68 posted on 04/07/2009 10:49:33 AM PDT by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tarheelswamprat

Agreed ~ why take the time to follow the case when they can fling scat from the safe and lofty heights of their cages?


69 posted on 04/07/2009 11:00:05 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (Obama went down on that Saudi King faster than an elevator whore in a 2 story building.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

It was under a Republican attorney general. I don’t know what the party registration of the prosecutors were.


70 posted on 04/07/2009 11:05:15 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Our ENTIRE government is broken.....and corrupt.


71 posted on 04/07/2009 11:09:14 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Altera
Let’s hope Holder is not motivated by his own partisan position.

When did the FBI whistleblower tell Justice, and when did Holder learn of it?

Anyone who knew this and waited until after the election is complicit in rigging a federal election.

72 posted on 04/07/2009 11:15:12 AM PDT by 4woodenboats (Obama went down on that Saudi King faster than an elevator whore in a 2 story building.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Remember the federal prosecutor scandal that involved prosecutors who refused to prosecute voter fraud and illega alien cases? Well, this was the other side of that issue. Bush's hands were tied.

Holder is going to require training for the prosecutors, probably to on how to use political prosecutions and not get caught.

73 posted on 04/07/2009 11:16:13 AM PDT by Eva (union motto - Aim for mediocrity, it's only fair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Justice
Holder has done this to stir up and confuse things in the Land of Sarah.

I don't know why Holder did it. Perhaps you are right about that. One thing is for certain, there is a motive beyond a Republican being treated unfairly.

My initial thinking on this was that Stevens is irrelevant to the Democrats now so they could point to some supposed gesture of fairness when they go on a binge trying to prosecute relevant Republicans in the future.

74 posted on 04/07/2009 11:18:08 AM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
dems did a great job of cheating to take over the US Senate

And then there is Minnesota. Find a ballot box in your trunk and you get a star from ACORN.

75 posted on 04/07/2009 11:20:06 AM PDT by Stars&StripesNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

I wondier ... Is there any way to check the party affiliations of the subjects of this investigation:

“Subjects of the probe are Brenda Morris, the lead prosecutor in the Stevens case and the No. 2 official in the Public Integrity Section; Public Integrity prosecutors Nicholas Marsh and Edward Sullivan; Alaska federal prosecutors Joseph Bottini and James Goeke; and William Welch, who did not participate in the trial but who supervises the Public Integrity section.”


76 posted on 04/07/2009 11:24:23 AM PDT by drellberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

“..Senator Stevens was indicted and prosecuted by [CAREER PROSECUTORS working in]the Bush administration’s Justice Department..”

Why is the concept of PROFESSIONAL CAREER PROSECUTORS so difficult to understand?


77 posted on 04/07/2009 11:28:33 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
"Who was it who asked “Where do I go to get my reputation back ?”

It was a Labor Department Secretary in the Reagan Administration, but his name escapes me. He was convicted in the MSM for graft, but there was never enough evidence to prosecute him, IIRC.

78 posted on 04/07/2009 11:41:22 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: freespirited
Well again, disbarment isn't up to any jury. - mores the pity.

Its up to the Bar.

As for the rest, I will consider it a major victory just to see a proper indictment handed down.

79 posted on 04/07/2009 11:44:09 AM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Geez! Sorry for the premature posting.

I just realized how many Freepers knew who asked, “Where do I go to get my reputation back”?

A pretty impressive bunch of political junkies!


80 posted on 04/07/2009 11:44:40 AM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson