Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge orders investigation of Stevens prosecutors
AP - Yahoo News ^ | April 7, 2009 | AP

Posted on 04/07/2009 9:02:13 AM PDT by VRWCTexan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: GeorgiaDawg32
"where do I go to get my reward?”.."

WELL . . . . . .
A guy named Lucifer has it. . . . . . . . . Me don't think you gona like it too much. . . . Kinday like them 30 Virgins the the Tally-Ban gives out. . . . . .

41 posted on 04/07/2009 9:54:22 AM PDT by DeaconRed (The Situation is 100 Times worse than we ever imagined. BO Has Got to GO! ! ! FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537
I do not have a lot of confidence in the investigation. Democrats investigating Democrats; kinda of like putting a bank robber in charge of the vault.
42 posted on 04/07/2009 9:58:32 AM PDT by reader25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
Are you referring to the November Coup?

I think so.

43 posted on 04/07/2009 10:02:31 AM PDT by 1035rep ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

The Democrats and the liberal mainstream media are spinning this that Senator Stevens was indicted under Bush’s Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and he was tried under Bush’s Attorney General Michael Mukasey. Both lead prosecutors were promoted to their positions in the Justice Department’s Public Integrity section during the Bush administration.
The Democrats are quick to point out that Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder is the one who recommended to the judge the dropping of the charges against Senator Stevens.
Holder dropped the charges to make the previous administration’s Justice Department look corrupt.


44 posted on 04/07/2009 10:03:20 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

The Judge has opened a criminal investigation in to the prosecution (prosecutors) of the Stevens case, per WLS radio news.


45 posted on 04/07/2009 10:04:16 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Maybe it is just me. But from reading the article, Stevens was not without sin. A 7 year loan of a massage chair was not a gift. A 29k statue was on his porch just because that is where it was delivered.


46 posted on 04/07/2009 10:06:09 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
At trial, he argued that he didn't disclose the items he received because they were not gifts. A $2,700 massage chair, for instance, remained in his house for seven years but Stevens said it was a loan. He said he assumed a $3,200 stained-glass window was paid for, since his wife takes care of such things. A $29,000 fish statue was a donation to his foundation, he said, and only remained on his front porch because that's where the donors shipped it.

C'mon, FR, Stevens was dirty.

Yes, the prosecutors were dirty, too. But that doesn't exonerate Stevens. Is our standard to call a politician dirty whether or not he has been convicted or whether he accepted gifts from people that he didn't report?

The behavior of the GOP here is appalling. Stevens shouldn't get his reputation back because he did what he was accused of. He's not going to jail because the prosecutors engaged in misconduct.

STEVENS IS DIRTY!

47 posted on 04/07/2009 10:08:25 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

It isn’t party - it is power mad people who viewed getting a feather in their cap more important than due process and justice. This sort of corruption crosses party lines.


48 posted on 04/07/2009 10:09:17 AM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
At trial, he argued that he didn't disclose the items he received because they were not gifts. A $2,700 massage chair, for instance, remained in his house for seven years but Stevens said it was a loan.

Hmmmm. 7 year loan of a massage chair? If it was a loan, what was the interest on the loan? That whole thing seems ludicrous to me. My common sense detector went off on that one alone.

49 posted on 04/07/2009 10:10:47 AM PDT by mc5cents (Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

It was a GoP administration that investigated and tried a sitting GoP Senator.

It was a Dem administration that revealed that little cover-up thingy.

The DEms are jealous of the viciousness of the GoP stomping on its “own”. They oughta be.


50 posted on 04/07/2009 10:12:57 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
Holder has done this to stir up and confuse things in the Land of Sarah.

Make no mistake...they see her as a real danger, especially the potential for her to gut their global warming stuff, which is their most potent weapon for the time being.

Make no mistake...Alaska is in the crosshairs in some very diabolical ways.

51 posted on 04/07/2009 10:15:31 AM PDT by Justice (Never trust a Russian. They are cheats and Liars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: et al

Some prosecutors (both state and federal) act as blind zealots and seek a conviction at any cost. However, their statutory role is to, “see that justice is done” and not merely to seek a conviction. But many have monumental egos which defeat any objectivity.

This case is especially troubling because, as reported, the prosecutors knowingly withheld significant exculpatory evidence from the defense. If true, they are not only guilty of gross misconduct, but they may also be prosecuted themselves (for an array of charges; obstruction, wrongful prosecution, etc.). In addition, the case investigators know what “evidence” they collected and what data needed to be provided to the defense pursuant to law. What evidence was provided to the Judge and how did he rule re its admissibility? Lotsa questions here.

AG Holder’s actions of withdrawing the conviction are amazing to say the least. Now the govt. is supposed to investigate their own? This presents additional problems. I assume a Special Prosecutor (outside the DOJ) will need to handle this investigation. This will be interesting case to follow and I would not be surprised if some of the prosecutors and/or investigators are charged criminally.

The AGO is a very political office. Let’s hope Holder is not motivated by his own partisan position.


52 posted on 04/07/2009 10:20:15 AM PDT by Altera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan
Too late.

The witch hunt against Ted Stevens worked.
The condemnation of Republicans in 06 and 08 was a success.

Welcome to ObamaNation.

53 posted on 04/07/2009 10:20:48 AM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Nifong redux


54 posted on 04/07/2009 10:25:16 AM PDT by evad (YES!! I WANT Obama's Agenda TO FAIL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Too late.
The witch hunt against Ted Stevens worked.
The condemnation of Republicans in 06 and 08 was a success.

Welcome to ObamaNation.


Except Senator Stevens was indicted and prosecuted by the Bush administration’s Justice Department and the charges were dropped by a Democrat. The Judge in the Stevens case is a Clinton appointee to his current position on the US District Court bench.


55 posted on 04/07/2009 10:27:46 AM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

ok NOW can we have emergency suspensions of the licenses of these lawyers?

seriously, prosecutorial misconduct = disbarment.


56 posted on 04/07/2009 10:30:38 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico

given how most ALL federal judges come from the DOJ prosecutorial ranks, culling the heard is a good thing.


57 posted on 04/07/2009 10:31:39 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: evad
Nifong redux

Except in the Nifong case, the defendants didn't do what they were accused of.

58 posted on 04/07/2009 10:32:25 AM PDT by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

obviously you never had a neighbor borrow a power tool...


59 posted on 04/07/2009 10:32:57 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

This should be challenged in court. Stevens was ripped off and a Special Election for the Senate seat he lost must be held again.


60 posted on 04/07/2009 10:33:05 AM PDT by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson