Not very sound logic. Hitler is evil. Hitler believed in Darwinism. Therefore Darwinism has to be evil.
4 posted on
04/07/2009 12:27:40 PM PDT by
TerP26
To: TerP26
A guy who could say this:
In 1833 he made the acquaintance of General Juan Manual de Rosas, who was busy liquidating the Indian population of southern Argentina. “This war of extermination,” Darwin wrote in a cheerful letter home, “although carried on with the most shocking barbarity, will certainly produce great benefits; it will at once throw open four or 500 miles in length of fine country for the produce of cattle.” The “extermination” (a favorite word of Darwin in his writings) of failed races, whether animal or human, is a great theme in his books and a key feature in the advance of the evolutionary process as he conceived it.
is pretty heartless and certainly not a respecter of God or His laws!
7 posted on
04/07/2009 12:33:37 PM PDT by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Be prepared for tough times. FReepmail me to learn about our survival thread!)
To: TerP26
Why yes it is!!! For as we all know, the Jews through out history were never ever persecuted,
then along came Darwin.....
8 posted on
04/07/2009 12:34:01 PM PDT by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: TerP26
I wonder where the idea that some humans are “less human” than others came from... I just can’t find that in any theory anywhere... oh, wait, here it is.
9 posted on
04/07/2009 12:34:30 PM PDT by
MrB
(Go Galt now, Bowman later)
To: TerP26
23 posted on
04/07/2009 12:51:27 PM PDT by
stormer
To: TerP26
You misstate the argument. Darwin was not a Hitler but he did provide what seemed to be a scientific justification for the circular reasoning of the survival of the fittest to be considered only the fittest survive.
25 posted on
04/07/2009 12:58:43 PM PDT by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: TerP26
In 1833 he made the acquaintance of General Juan Manual de Rosas, who was busy liquidating the Indian population of southern Argentina. "This war of extermination," Darwin wrote in a cheerful letter home, "although carried on with the most shocking barbarity, will certainly produce great benefits; it will at once throw open four or 500 miles in length of fine country for the produce of cattle." The "extermination" (a favorite word of Darwin in his writings) of failed races, whether animal or human, is a great theme in his books and a key feature in the advance of the evolutionary process as he conceived it. In The Descent of Man (1871), Darwin prophesied: "At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races."
I'm guessing you didn't read this bit. Can't stand in the way of progress, and all that.
28 posted on
04/07/2009 1:10:41 PM PDT by
Liberty1970
(Democrats are not in control. God is. And Thank God for that!)
To: TerP26
Not quite. It is perfect logic... Darwin was an atheist. Hitler was an atheist who accepted Darwin’s philosophy because it fit in so nicely with his atheism—human life has no intrinsic value. In fact, humans are nothing more than animals.
Atheism leads to the loss of any respect or concern for human life (especially that of the weak and helpless), leads to moral relativism (you decide what is evil and good), and immorality reigns because there is no afterlife, therefore, no need for reflection and remorse for actions on earth.
Hitler was evil and Darwinism can lead one into evil and when it becomes the prevalent religion as it did in Germany, it is evil. Watch Ben Stein’s movie, “Expelled”. Without the intertwining ribbon of Judeo Christian religion, Darwinism is evil.
To: TerP26
Therefore Darwinism has to be evil. Just ignorant of first principles. That alone, with enough energy behind it, will lead to some grotesquely inhuman consequences.
106 posted on
04/07/2009 5:23:55 PM PDT by
the invisib1e hand
("...made damn sure that Pilate washed his hands and sealed his fate...")
To: TerP26; qam1; GodGunsGuts
TerP26 wrote:
"Not very sound logic. Hitler is evil. Hitler believed in Darwinism. Therefore Darwinism has to be evil."
...not very sound honesty. Hitler used Darwin's hypotheses, as much as he used ancient Rome's and Prussia's to found his genocidal actions upon. Darwin, in part, wrote the same sentiments with the same intent. See the quotations of Darwin in the sixth paragraph of the posted article above this thread.
qam1 wrote:
"Why yes it is!!! For as we all know, the Jews through out history were never ever persecuted,
then along came Darwin....."
See my tagline for more comprehensive, obvious and common knowledge. British, Russian and southwest European nationalism and subjectivism have been polluting Early American friendliness toward the people of Israel for a long time.
The USA should not welcome European anarchism any more than communism or fascism, as anarchy was only a tool for those of the other two systems of government.
150 posted on
04/08/2009 10:14:57 AM PDT by
familyop
(Randian objectivism: all about me, me,...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson