Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ethics board launches probe into Rep Jesse Jackson Jr.
Chicago Sun Times ^ | 4-7-09 | Natasha Korecki

Posted on 04/07/2009 4:09:48 PM PDT by STARWISE

A congressional ethics board has launched a preliminary inquiry into U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill), related to President Obama’s vacant Senate seat and the corruption investigation of ousted Gov. Rod Blagojevich, the Chicago Sun-Times has learned.

The Office of Congressional Ethics, formed just last year, voted in late March to conduct a “preliminary review,” of actions surrounding Jackson’s bid to be appointed to the Senate seat, according to documents released by the office.

The committee launched the action Thursday — the same day Blagojevich was indicted on corruption charges.

The panel has asked parties in the Blagojevich case — including his former gubernatorial staff and campaign staff — to turn over any documents, emails, or other correspondence involving Jackson Jr. and his campaign staff, Jackson’s brother, Jonathan, and political fund-raisers Raghuveer Nayak and Rajinder Bedi, lawyers close to the probe told the Sun-Times.

The request for information is from June of last year through Dec. 31, 2008.

Nayak, Bedi and Jonathan Jackson attended a Dec. 6 fund-raiser hosted by the Indian community for Friends of Blagojevich. People attending the event have told the Sun-Times that discussions about future fund-raising for congressman Jackson’s Senate candidacy took place at the function.

Jesse Jackson Jr. has not been accused of wrongdoing in the Blagojevich case. He was referred to as “Candidate A” in the indictment of Blagojevich and was recently interviewed by the feds.

Blagojevich believed he would be paid $1.5 million through Jackson Jr. “emissaries” if he named Jackson to the Senate seat, according to the federal charges.

A federal criminal complaint alleges that the ex-governor told his brother in a recorded call to meet with Nayak, referred to as "Individual D," to ask about giving money up front for Jackson’s appointment. The next day the ex-governor told his own brother to “undo that [Nayak] thing” after reports surfaced that the feds could be recording conversations, according to the criminal complaint against Blagojevich.

Nayak has since been in discussions with federal investigators.

The ethics panel typically investigates a matter for 30 days before making a recommendation to the House members’ chief ethics panel, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct. That committee can take action, refuse action or continue the probe.

Leo Wise, who heads the Office of Congressional Ethics, said he could not confirm or deny the existence of any investigation. His non-partisan panel, made up of private citizens, was created by the House last year to review allegations against its members. Judge Abner Mikva is among those on the panel.

“We’re a fact-gathering, investigative entity,” Wise said. Wise explained that the panel does not have subpoena abilities but the House dictated powers allowing it to interview witnesses and request documents.

A spokesman for congressman Jackson did not return a call seeking comment. Jonathan Jackson also did not respond to a request for comment.

Jesse Jackson Jr. is the second member of the Illinois delegation to come under ethical scrutiny this year. The Senate ethics committee launched an inquiry into Sen. Roland Burris’s appointment by Blagojevich. Burris has given conflicting answers about his contacts with the former governor and his campaign operation prior to the appointment.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 111th; blagojevich; congress; corruptdems; ethics; jessejacksonjr; jjj; paytoplay
And the Chicago beat goes on ..........
1 posted on 04/07/2009 4:09:49 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: penelopesire; BulletBobCo; seekthetruth; television is just wrong; jcsjcm; BP2; Pablo Mac; ...

~~DING!


2 posted on 04/07/2009 4:10:06 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (LIBS-STILL) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war- Richard Miniter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Would this even make the news in that Corrupt Place?
3 posted on 04/07/2009 4:11:21 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Osamabama Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

But BO couldn’t have possibly known anything.


4 posted on 04/07/2009 4:12:25 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

J. J. Jr. unethical?


5 posted on 04/07/2009 4:14:21 PM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (I voted Republican because no Conservatives were running.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The report on JJ Jr. is in: no unethical or illegal behavior was found. End of investigation.


6 posted on 04/07/2009 4:17:50 PM PDT by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
Another subversive attempt to appease the blacks. Over and over again, the race baiting appeasers avoid the truth because this is the son of a *black shake down artist* that could in sight racial discourse. A crook county Crook is a crook!
7 posted on 04/07/2009 5:52:59 PM PDT by katiekins1 (i bow to no one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
A congressional ethics board has launched a preliminary inquiry into U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill), ...

That's a good thing. Now we will see if it winds up a whitewash.

8 posted on 04/07/2009 5:58:46 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston (Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

About dang time.


9 posted on 04/07/2009 6:07:36 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Is Jr. taking the heat for his father?

Not that i think that anything will come of this.


10 posted on 04/07/2009 6:59:53 PM PDT by uncitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That ethics board must be racist.(S)


11 posted on 04/07/2009 7:21:58 PM PDT by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson