[freedumb2003]

Actually you have advanced several things. You ask questions, then supply your own answers about the person. Or you think you are clever by putting a question mark at the end of your assertion, or posing it as several questions.

I can recap.

To you, I asked by what criteria is something like Evolution not science and other aspects OK science. You then asked for a definition of science, which I provided. The original question is still open.

To J0299, I asked the question to clarify if the RCC is not to be hated for their teaching then what is being hated? Is it the teacher? I am still not clear.

I hope this helps. I get lost thread swimming sometimes, too.

[Jaime2099]

I asked the question to clarify if the RCC is not to be hated for their teaching then what is being hated? Is it the teacher? I am still not clear.

It is neither the Roman Catholic church, nor is it any teacher of Human Evolution. It is the theory of Human Evolution which I hate. That is your answer just as I posted before.

[valkyry1]

What you provided was an opinion, an editorial, not a definition. And I did not ask for it, I said go ahead with it if that is what you felt a need to do.