Are we really that dumb? (Yes...0bots are!)

WND ^ | April 10, 2009 | Hal Lindsey

[appleseed]

There needs to be a quaint colloquialism Americans can use to describe when a politician looks you square in the eye and tells you an obvious lie. At least, one fit for polite company.

Like when our American president bows down low before a foreign potentate and then denies it. Once the picture hit the American media, the White House scrambled to explain that Obama had to bend over to his waist level in order to grasp King Abdullah by both hands when greeting him last week at the G-20 meeting.

So what you saw wasn't what you really saw. It was just a recorded figment of your imagination.

The camera angles showing our American president bending at the knee wasn't what it looked like, at all. And so we must assume that our American president bowed low enough to put his head below shoulder level of the foreign potentate, was because King Abdullah is short, and has unusually long arms so that he couldn't elevate his hands high enough for Obama to reach without bending over.

[appleseed]

The mirror speaks - The reflection lies.

[gondramB]

>>There needs to be a quaint colloquialism Americans can use to describe when a politician looks you square in the eye and tells you an obvious lie. At least, one fit for polite company.<<

How about a “Lewinsky” ?

[classified]

Obama doesn’t want the world to know how much he admires the Arab Muslim World especially the Jews!

[alecqss]

The official (anonimously official) explanation of bow is beyond pathetic.

Overall, I would very much prefer to disagree with the political opponents, not to be disgusted with them. Unfortunately this is one of the few choices that are not mine to make...

[HangnJudge]

[Jeff Gordon]

Would this man lie to you?

[Dustoff45]

At least BHO knew from his Indonesia days not to use his left [dirty] hand to touch an Arab. Something his staff was not aware of when they made their gratuitous comment about a double-handed hand shake.

[capydick]

the White House scrambled to explain that Obama had to bend over to his waist level in order to grasp King Abdullah by both hands when greeting him last week at the G-20 meeting.

If you look at the tape - you'll see Bama's left hand at his side and then coming up after the bow.

In another breach of protocol, here is the angry militant touching the Queen of England:

[Cyber Ninja]

ping to post 2

[tophat9000]

BOcrap?

[SECURE AMERICA]

There needs to be a quaint colloquialism Americans can use to describe when a politician looks you square in the eye and tells you an obvious lie. At least, one fit for polite company

LIAR seems to be fine.....

[tophat9000]

BO’ing smoke?

[PubliusMM]

We all know what we saw. The lies from the Anointed One regarding this travesty are just that...more lies.

It’s time to take back the country.

[al baby]

Why yes just call 1-800-DENTIST

[tophat9000]

Talking out your BOhole?

[razorback-bert]

"It wasn't a bow. He grasped his hand with two hands, and he's taller than King Abdullah," said an Obama aide,

So, he insulted the king by touching him with his left unclean hand, fine with me.

[Truth29]

The obvious, blatant lie and subservience to a Muslim King gives credence to those who believe Obama is hiding his place of birth and his true religion.

[appleseed]

This isn't a bow. Your eyes aren't seeing a bow. He didn't kiss the snakes hand. America is bad, arrogant and dismissive. America loves Islam.

I despise this ring kissing freak with all my heart, mind and soul!

[HangnJudge]

[HangnJudge]

I am left brained visual and
understand better with images than words