Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Dangers Of The Drinking Age
Forbes ^ | Apr 15, 2009 | Jeffrey A. Miron and Elina Tetelbaum

Posted on 04/16/2009 2:05:18 PM PDT by zaphod3000

For the past 20 years, the U.S. has maintained a Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 21 (MLDA21), with little public debate about the wisdom of this policy. Recently, however, more than 100 college and university presidents signed the Amethyst Initiative, a public statement calling for "an informed and dispassionate public debate over the effects of the 21-year-old drinking age."

SNIP

Our research compares traffic fatality rates in states before and after they changed their MLDA from 18 to 21. In contrast to all earlier work, however, we examined separately the impact in states that adopted an MLDA21 on their own and those that were coerced by the FUDAA.

The results are striking. Virtually all the life-saving impact of the MLDA21 comes from the few early-adopting states, not from the larger number that resulted from federal pressure. Further, any life-saving effect in those states that first raised the drinking age was only temporary, occurring largely in the first year or two after switching to the MLDA21.

Our results thus challenge both the value of the MLDA21 and the value of coercive federalism. While we find limited evidence that the MLDA21 saves lives when states adopted it of their own volition, we find no evidence it saves lives when the federal government compels this policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: alcohol; drinking; drinkingage; neoprohibition; opinion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2009 2:05:18 PM PDT by zaphod3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

so I guess we should raise it to 35?


2 posted on 04/16/2009 2:07:04 PM PDT by GeronL (TYRANNY SENTINEL. http://tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

If your old enough to get your @$$ shot off in Iraq, your old enough to have a cold beer, in my book. 18 should be the drinking age.


3 posted on 04/16/2009 2:07:30 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

The local bars in the small town where I grew up would let military enlistees drink before they were 21. It wasn’t legal but it was just that kind of place.


4 posted on 04/16/2009 2:09:50 PM PDT by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

We aren’t as strict about drunk driving as we need to be. Don’t blame the bottle, blame the nut behind the wheel.


5 posted on 04/16/2009 2:10:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
A copy of Does the Minimum Legal Drinking Age Save Lives? can be downloaded here.
6 posted on 04/16/2009 2:11:09 PM PDT by zaphod3000 (Free markets, free minds, free lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

You are absolutely right. It’s a joke that an 18-year old can sign up for lethal combat in Iraq, but has no right to order a beer — or soon, even buy a pack of cigarettes. What a joke.


7 posted on 04/16/2009 2:13:12 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
If your old enough to get your @$$ shot off in Iraq, your old enough to have a cold beer, in my book. 18 should be the drinking age.

I've been saying that since they raised it!!!

8 posted on 04/16/2009 2:13:39 PM PDT by org.whodat (Auto unions bad: Machinists union good=Hypocrisy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

I have found that teenagers and booze just don’t mix. The age limit doesn’t prevent them from drinking though.


9 posted on 04/16/2009 2:13:49 PM PDT by misterrob (FUBO----Just say it, Foooooooooooooo Bohhhhhhhhh. Smooth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
We should lower it to 12 because they're gonna do it anyway.

And every beer should come with a free condom so if it do something stupid when you're drunk, you can do it safely.

10 posted on 04/16/2009 2:15:48 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weight-lifting sessions each week and...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Actually, we exaggerate the risk of intoxicated driving and it is a tool of the state.

In my hometown they set up a monthly DUI roadblock. They catch about 3 DUIs, but incidentally stop another 290-300 people on other non-DUI offenses. The cash cow is the other people and we earn garner hundreds of thousands this way.

Now, what is happening to the other DUIs during the other 28, 29, or 30 days a month. Nothing.

It is a cover story for the tax collectors. Our police forces are essentially meter maids for the welfare state.

11 posted on 04/16/2009 2:15:50 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

I wonder what good money paid for the study?

Of course the early adopter states to 21 would see a reduction, as the 18-20 year olds went into neighboring states where they could drink legally. Once every state was forced to adopt then rates evened out again.


12 posted on 04/16/2009 2:15:55 PM PDT by oldpass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Neah. Ban it altogether. That worked so well during Prohibition.
For that matter, the minimum legal drinking age does such a good job at preventing under-aged individuals from getting beer, wine and liquor.


13 posted on 04/16/2009 2:16:18 PM PDT by Little Ray (Do we have a Plan B?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
Just more MADD people!

Can't have anybody enjoying themselves, you know! /sarcasm

I remember driving down to DC to visit the Cellar. I was 18, and could drink legally. Darn, I even drove back home! I'm amazed I kept making it, and never had a wreck!!! (NOT!)


14 posted on 04/16/2009 2:16:31 PM PDT by WVKayaker ( God said, 'Cancel Program GENESIS.' The universe ceased to exist.- Arth. C. Clarke's shortest story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

ping for later


15 posted on 04/16/2009 2:17:15 PM PDT by wolfpat (Revolt, and re-establish the Constitution as the law of the land!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

My state had a 18 year drinking age when I was that age...but has since succumbed to the standard 21 years of age.

I worked in the local hospital at age 17 in the evenings after college classes. I wore the white uniform of the place....and after work I went to the local bar and being I had the uniform I was served. I do believe the statute of limitation are up on that crime though.


16 posted on 04/16/2009 2:17:20 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

Wish we could find out what would. So much time of youth is spent vomiting and partying. We need more teetotalers.


17 posted on 04/16/2009 2:17:26 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

I mean, when we catch them the “normal” way. I’m not a big fan of road blocks.


18 posted on 04/16/2009 2:17:43 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000
At the E club on Ft Huachuca you only have to be 18 to drink. I spent many a night there...

However, that might be because so many of the soldiers were going to Mexico to drink, alot were getting killed in accidents on the drive home.
19 posted on 04/16/2009 2:18:45 PM PDT by Frogtacos (It all went to hell when we started cooking outside and crapping inside.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zaphod3000

I grew up in New York when the drinking age was 18, and that was just fine. The important thing is to set social boundaries for what is acceptable. Being disgustingly drunk at any age - 18, 21 or 60 - is not okay.


20 posted on 04/16/2009 2:20:11 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson